Public Attitudes and Behavior Regarding Organ Donation

JAMA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 253 (21) ◽  
pp. 3111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane L. Manninen
JAMA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 253 (21) ◽  
pp. 3111-3115 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Manninen

Author(s):  
Nehad J. Ahmed ◽  
Abdulrahman S. Alrawili ◽  
Faisal Z. Alkhawaja

Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the public concerns, attitudes and behavior towards vaccination. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study that included an online survey about the public concerns, attitudes and behavior towards vaccination in Saudi Arabia. The survey was translated to Arabic language and converted to an online form using google forms and after that it was sent to be filled by the parents. Results: About 92% of the respondents said that children should be vaccinated in order to protect them and about 86% of them believed that vaccinations are safe for children in general. Regarding the concerns about vaccination, about 69% of the respondents were concerned about the distress to children of the injection itself and 59% of them were concerned about the increasing number of vaccines recommended for children. Furthermore, about 62% of the respondents were concerned that vaccines are not tested enough for safety. Conclusion: The majority of respondents in this study reported positive attitude but more than half of them expressed some degree of concern regarding children vaccination. Healthcare professionals should play an active role in clarifying these concerns about vaccination with the public. Moreover, they should communicate with parents regarding the vaccinations and provide them with a trusted information about the vaccine.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 2009-2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Akgün ◽  
I Tokalak ◽  
R Erdal

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 2698-2701 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Georgiadou ◽  
N. Sounidakis ◽  
E. Mouloudi ◽  
P. Giaglis ◽  
T. Giasnetsova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (28) ◽  
pp. eabc2717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Green ◽  
Jared Edgerton ◽  
Daniel Naftel ◽  
Kelsey Shoub ◽  
Skyler J. Cranmer

Cues sent by political elites are known to influence public attitudes and behavior. Polarization in elite rhetoric may hinder effective responses to public health crises, when accurate information and rapid behavioral change can save lives. We examine polarization in cues sent to the public by current members of the U.S. House and Senate during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, measuring polarization as the ability to correctly classify the partisanship of tweets’ authors based solely on the text and the dates they were sent. We find that Democrats discussed the crisis more frequently–emphasizing threats to public health and American workers–while Republicans placed greater emphasis on China and businesses. Polarization in elite discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in mid-February—weeks after the first confirmed case in the United States—and continued into March. These divergent cues correspond with a partisan divide in the public’s early reaction to the crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document