scholarly journals Interpretation of Genetic Test Results for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

JAMA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 282 (3) ◽  
pp. 247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapna Syngal ◽  
Edward A. Fox ◽  
Christine Li ◽  
Marisa Dovidio ◽  
Charis Eng ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lu ◽  
A. S. Macdonald ◽  
H. R. Waters ◽  
F. Yu

ABSTRACTHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is characterised by the familial aggregation of cancer of the colon and rectum (CRC). It may be caused by any of five mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes or by non-genetic factors, such as life style. However, it accounts for only about 2% of CRC, which is a very common cancer. Previous actuarial models, of diseases with only genetic causes, assumed that a family history of the disease shows mutations to be present, but this is not true of HNPCC. This is a significant limitation, since the best information available to an underwriter (especially if the use of genetic test results is banned) is likely to be knowledge of a family history of CRC. We present a Markov model of CRC and HNPCC, which includes the presence of a family history of CRC as a state, and estimate its intensities allowing for MMR genotype. Using this we find the MMR mutation probabilities for an insurance applicant with a family history of CRC. Our model greatly simplifies the intensive computational burden of finding such probabilities by integrating over complex models of hidden family structure. We estimate the costs of critical illness insurance given the applicant's genotype or the presence of a family history. We then consider what the cost of adverse selection might be, if insurers are unable to use genetic tests or family history information. We also consider the effect of using alternative definitions of a family history in underwriting.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-412
Author(s):  
Manami Yamashita ◽  
Hitoshi Okamura ◽  
Yoshie Murakami ◽  
Kokichi Sugano ◽  
Teruhiko Yoshida ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshie Murakami ◽  
Hitoshi Okamura ◽  
Kokichi Sugano ◽  
Teruhiko Yoshida ◽  
Keiko Kazuma ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (24) ◽  
pp. 3981-3986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa Grover ◽  
Elena M. Stoffel ◽  
Rowena C. Mercado ◽  
Beth M. Ford ◽  
Wendy K. Kohlman ◽  
...  

Purpose Lynch syndrome is associated with inherited germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Genetic testing in high-risk individuals may yield indeterminate results if no mutation is found or if a mutation of unclear pathogenic significance is observed. There are limited data regarding how well patients with Lynch syndrome understand the clinical implications of genetic test results. This study examines colorectal cancer (CRC) risk perception in individuals tested for MMR mutations and identifies the factors associated with an appropriate interpretation of their cancer risk. Patients and Methods A total of 159 individuals who met the Revised Bethesda Guidelines and had previously undergone genetic testing completed a questionnaire eliciting demographic data, cancer history, genetic test results, and an estimate of their CRC risk. Associations between clinical factors, genetic test results, and CRC risk perception were explored using multivariable analyses. Results Of the 100 individuals with a pathogenic mutation (true positive), 90 (90%) correctly estimated their CRC risk as “high” or “very high” compared with other individuals their age. However, only 23 (62%) of 37 individuals with an indeterminate genetic test result correctly estimated their risk. Individuals with a history of Lynch syndrome–associated cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.1; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.6) or indeterminate genetic test results (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.6) were significantly less likely to estimate their CRC risk as increased. Conclusion Patients at risk for Lynch syndrome with an indeterminate genetic test result may be falsely reassured. It is important that health care providers continue to discuss the implications of uninformative results on lifetime cancer risk.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. W. H. Hendriks ◽  
F. J. M. Grosfeld ◽  
A. A. M. Wilde ◽  
J. van den Bout ◽  
I. M. van Langen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document