The Symptom Discounting Effect : What to Do When Negative Genetic Test Results Become Risk Factors for Alcohol Use Disorder

Most consumers of genetic testing for health conditions test negative, yet the psychological perils of this are hardly known. In three experiments (N=2,103) participants discounted repercussions of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), after learning or imagining that they were not genetically predisposed to AUD. Such discounting can lead people to avoid treatment and to feel safe to continue or even increase their drinking, ironically turning the negative genetic feedback into a risk factor for AUD. This misconception derives from not understanding the Causal Markov condition as applied to this case; once AUD symptoms are present, their ramifications remain the same regardless of whether genes or environments caused the symptoms. Educating participants about this principle mitigated the irrational discounting of threats of AUD, even among Individuals already engaging in problematic drinking, for whom the debriefing currently used by a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company was found to be ineffective in the current study.

Exome Sequencing Highlights a Potential Role for Concealed Cardiomyopathies in Youthful Sudden Cardiac Death

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and sudden unexplained death (SUD) are feared sequelae of many genetic heart diseases. In rare circumstances, pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes may result in electrical instability leading to SCA/SUD before any structural manifestations of underlying cardiomyopathy are evident. Methods: Collectively, 38 unexplained SCA survivors (21 males; mean age at SCA 26.4±13.1 years), 68 autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases (49 males; mean age at death 20.4±9.0 years) without disease-causative variants in the channelopathy genes, and 973 ostensibly healthy controls were included. Following exome sequencing, ultrarare (minor allele frequency ≤0.00005 in any ethnic group within Genome Aggregation Database [gnomAD, n=141 456 individuals]) nonsynonymous variants identified in 24 ClinGen adjudicated definitive/strong evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes were analyzed. Eligible variants were adjudicated as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variant of uncertain significance in accordance with current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Results: Overall, 7 out of 38 (18.4%) SCA survivors and 14 out of 68 (20.5%) autopsy-inconclusive, channelopathic-negative SUD cases had at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic or a variant of uncertain significance nonsynonymous variant within a strong evidence, cardiomyopathy-susceptibility gene. Following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criterion variant adjudication, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified in 3 out of 38 (7.9%; P =0.05) SCA survivors and 8 out of 68 (11.8%; P =0.0002) autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases compared to 20 out of 973 (2.1%) European controls. Interestingly, the yield of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was significantly greater in autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases with documented interstitial fibrosis (4/11, 36%) compared with only 4 out of 57 (7%, P <0.02) SUD cases without ventricular fibrosis. Conclusion: Our data further supports the inclusion of strongevidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes on the genetic testing panels used to evaluate unexplained SCA survivors and autopsy-inconclusive/negative SUD decedents. However, to avoid diagnostic miscues, the careful interpretation of genetic test results in patients without overt phenotypes is vital.

Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in Relation to Newly Emerging Monogenic Forms of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Importance of Phenotype Reevaluation after Pangenomic Results

ASD genetic diagnosis has dramatically improved due to NGS technologies, and many new causative genes have been discovered. Consequently, new ASD phenotypes have emerged. An extensive exome sequencing study carried out by the Autism Sequencing Consortium (ASC) was published in February 2020. The study identified 102 genes which are de novo mutated in subjects affected by autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or similar neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The majority of these genes was already known to be implicated in ASD or NDDs, whereas approximately 30 genes were considered “novel” as either they were not previously associated with ASD/NDDs or very little information about them was present in the literature. The aim of this work is to review the current literature since the publication of the ASC paper to see if new data mainly concerning genotype–phenotype correlations of the novel genes have been added to the existing one. We found new important clinical and molecular data for 6 of the 30 novel genes. Though the broad and overlapping neurodevelopmental phenotypes observed in most monogenic forms of NDDs make it difficult for the clinical geneticist to address gene-specific tests, knowledge of these new data can at least help to prioritize and interpret results of pangenomic tests to some extent. Indeed, for some of the new emerging genes analyzed in the present work, specific clinical features emerged that may help the clinical geneticist to make the final diagnosis by associating the genetic test results with the phenotype. The importance of this relatively new approach known as “reverse phenotyping” will be discussed.

Association Between Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Multiethnic Women Diagnosed With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Increasing usage of multigene panel testing has identified more patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P or LP) variants in low-moderate penetrance genes or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Our study evaluates the association between genetic test results and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among patients with breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women diagnosed with unilateral stage 0-III breast cancer between 2013 and 2020 who underwent genetic testing. We examined whether genetic test results were associated with CPM using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Among 707 racially or ethnically diverse women, most had benign or likely benign (B or LB) variants, whereas 12.5% had P or LP and 17.9% had VUS. Racial or ethnic minorities were twice as likely to receive VUS. Patients with P or LP variants had higher CPM rates than VUS or B or LB (64.8% v 25.8% v 25.9%), and highest among women with P or LP variants in high-penetrance genes (74.6%). On multivariable analysis, P or LP compared with B or LB variants were significantly associated with CPM (odds ratio = 4.24; 95% CI, 2.48 to 7.26). CONCLUSION Women with P or LP variants on genetic testing were over four times more likely to undergo CPM than B or LB. Those with VUS had similar CPM rates as B or LB. Our findings suggest appropriate genetic counseling and communication of cancer risk to multiethnic breast cancer survivors.

“Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis

Background A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitative study explored how patients with CRC interpret and respond to an SLS diagnosis. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 patients with CRC who received an SLS diagnosis, recruited from cancer genetics services across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Participant responses were compared with appointment summary letters from cancer genetics services. Results Participants’ interpretations of genetic test results were found to vary widely. While this variation often aligned with variation in interpretations by cancer genetics services, participants also had difficulties with the complexity and recall of genetic test results. Participants had a range of psychological responses to the uncertainty that their results presented, from relief to disappointment and doubt. Cancer risk perceptions also varied widely, with participants’ interpretations of their genetic test results just one of several influencing factors. Despite this variability, almost all participants adhered to cancer risk management advice, although different participants received different advice. All participants also communicated any cancer risk management advice to first-degree relatives, motivated by protecting them, but information communicated was not always consistent with advice received. Conclusions Our study findings highlight the variability in patients’ interpretations of their diagnosis, cancer risk management and family communication when a diagnosis of SLS is received, and provide novel insights into how healthcare professionals can better support patients with SLS.

IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results

Background Implementing genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition into routine clinical care offers a tremendous opportunity for cancer prevention and early detection. However, genetic testing itself does not improve outcomes; rather, outcomes depend on implemented follow-up care. The IMPACT study is a hybrid type I randomized effectiveness-implementation trial to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions for individuals with inherited cancer predisposition focused on: 1) increasing family communication (FC) of genetic test results; and 2) improving engagement with guideline-based cancer risk management (CRM). Methods This prospective study will recruit a racially, geographically, and socioeconomically diverse population of individuals with a documented pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in an inherited cancer gene. Eligible participants will be asked to complete an initial trial survey and randomly assigned to one of three arms: A) GeneSHARE, a website designed to increase FC of genetic test results; B) My Gene Counsel’s Living Lab Report, a digital tool designed to improve understanding of genetic test results and next steps, including CRM guidelines; or C) a control arm in which participants continue receiving standard care. Follow-up surveys will be conducted at 1, 3, and 12 months following randomization. These surveys include single-item measures, scales, and indices related to: 1) FC and CRM behaviors and behavioral factors following the COM-B theoretical framework (i.e., capability, opportunity, and motivation); 2) implementation outcomes (i.e., acceptability, appropriateness, exposure, and reach); and 3) other contextual factors (i.e., sociodemographic and clinical factors, and uncertainty, distress, and positive aspects of genetic test results). The primary outcomes are an increase in FC of genetic test results (Arm A) and improved engagement with guideline-based CRM without overtreatment or undertreatment (Arm B) by the 12-month follow-up survey. Discussion Our interventions are designed to shift the paradigm by which individuals with P/LP variants in inherited cancer genes are provided with information to enhance FC of genetic test results and engagement with guideline-based CRM. The information gathered through evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of these real-world approaches is needed to modify and scale up adaptive, stepped interventions that have the potential to maximize FC and CRM. Trial registration This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04763915, date registered: February 21, 2021). Protocol version September 17th, 2021 Amendment Number 04.

Integration of germline multigene panel testing into breast and gynecologic oncology clinics.

164 Background: Germline genetic testing plays an important role in informing cancer screening and risk-reducing strategies, as well as treatment decisions with PARP inhibitors for BRCA-associated malignancies. Referrals to clinical genetics for pre-test counseling and results disclosure can be delayed due to financial and logistical barriers, which may ultimately delay clinical decision-making. Our study objective was to understand patient attitudes, knowledge, and anxiety/distress with point-of-care (POC) genetic testing in breast and gynecologic oncology clinics. Methods: We enrolled patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer, or endometrial cancer undergoing POC multigene panel testing with their primary oncologist, rather than a genetic counselor. Pre-test counseling came from discussion with their primary oncologist. Participants completed a survey at time of genetic testing and one after return of genetic test results. Validated measures of genetic testing knowledge, cancer-related distress, and attitudes towards genetic testing were included. Descriptive statistics were generated for all data collected and paired t-tests were conducted for baseline and follow-up comparisons. Results: We enrolled 106 subjects, of which 97 completed the baseline survey. All participants were female with a mean age of 61.5 years (SD 13.5). The cohort consisted of participants with the following tumor types: 80 breast, 2 ovarian, and 16 endometrial. Almost 44% of women identified as Hispanic/Latina, 55% had highest level of education of community/technical college or less, and 51.2% reported annual incomes of less than $50,000. Forty-seven percent of participants had adequate baseline genetic testing knowledge scores (defined as at least 50% correct responses). A majority of participants (86.6%) had positive attitudes toward undergoing genetic testing. Results of genetic testing revealed 11 participants (11.3%) with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (of which 36.3% were in BRCA1/2), 25 (25.8%) with variants of unknown significance (VUS), and 61 (62.9%) with benign or likely benign results. The mean cancer-related distress score (scale from 15 to 60, higher score indicates higher levels of distress) was 32.78 (SD 9.74) at baseline and 26.5 (SD 8.9) after receiving genetic testing results (p = 0.002). Genetic test results informed cancer treatment decisions regarding medications and surgery in 15% and 13% of patients, respectively, the majority of which were breast cancer patients. Conclusions: As genetic testing is more frequently used for clinical decision-making it is important to develop ways to efficiently integrate POC testing in the oncology clinics. We demonstrated that POC genetic testing for breast and gynecologic cancers is feasible and can inform clinical decision-making.

MR Brain Screening in ADPKD Patients

Background Adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) still represents a major cause of renal failure and intracranial aneurisms (IA) have a higher prevalence in ADPKD than in the general population. Current guidelines suggest performing brain MRI only in the subjects with a positive familiar history of IAs or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This is a retrospective case-control analysis to evaluate the usefulness of a MR screening program in ADPKD patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all ADPKD patients followed in our outpatient clinic between 2016 and 2019 who underwent a brain MRI screening. We evaluated the presence of IAs and others brain abnormalities and compared our results with a non-ADPKD population (n = 300). We performed univariate and multivariate regression analysis to evaluate if general and demographic features, laboratory findings, clinical parameters and genetic test results correlated with IAs or other brain abnormalities presence. Results Among the patients evaluated 17 out of 156 (13.6%) ADPKD patients had IAs, compared to 16 out of 300 (5.3%) non-ADPKD controls (p < 0.005). Considering ADPKD patients presenting IAs, 12 (70.6%) had no family history for IAs or SAH. Genetic analysis was available for 97 patients: in the sub-population with IAs, 13 (76.5%) presented a PKD1 mutation and none a PKD2 mutation. We found that arachnoid cysts (AC) (p < 0.001) and arterial anatomical variants (p < 0.04) were significantly more frequent in ADPKD patients. Conclusion In our population ADPKD patients showed a higher prevalence of IAs, AC and arterial variants compared to non-ADPKD. Most of the IAs were found in patients presenting a PKD1 mutation. We found a significant number of alterations even in those patients without a family history of IAs or SAH. The practice of submitting only patients with familial IAs or kidney transplantation candidates to MRI scan should be re-evaluated.

Evaluation of the parents’ anxiety levels before and after the diagnosis of their child with a rare genetic disease: the necessity of psychological support

Background The diagnosis of the rare genetic diseases has great importance in treating multisystemic conditions, preventing potential complications, and estimating disease risk for family members. The duration of obtaining genetic test results is varies. The demand to learn the diagnosis of a possible untreatable illness involves a struggle between uncertainty and a lifetime chronic disease. The current uncertainty of their child's condition and the long wait for a diagnosis may increase the parents' anxiety level and cause difficulties in the continuation of diagnostic procedures in some families. This study aimed to investigate the prediagnosis and postdiagnosis anxiety levels of parents who have a child with a rare genetic disease. Method The parents in this study, mothers or fathers, admitted their children to the Bezmialem Vakıf University Medical Genetics Clinic due to a suspected rare genetic disease (n = 40). Researchers created “The Sociodemographic Questionnaire” and used it to analyze the parents' sociodemographic status. In addition, they used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) to determine the anxiety levels of the parents. Results The state anxiety levels of parents decreased significantly after learning the diagnosis. However, there was no statistically significant decrease observed in trait anxiety levels. Conclusion Data from this study revealed that informing parents about their child's disease and properly explaining to them the expected difficulties might help to reduce their anxiety levels. Psychological support for parents is necessary to reduce their long-term stress, thus increasing the patient's compliance with treatment.