scholarly journals Comparison of Cardiovascular Safety for Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies in a Population-Based Cohort in Australia

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. e2136372
Author(s):  
Alys Havard ◽  
Stephanie K. Y. Choi ◽  
Sallie-Anne Pearson ◽  
Clara K. Chow ◽  
Duong T. Tran ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnoosh Momin ◽  
Antonio Neri ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Jennifer Kahende ◽  
Jennifer Duke ◽  
...  

Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) and National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP) are both well-positioned to promote the use of population-based tobacco cessation interventions, such as state quitlines and Web-based interventions.Aims: This paper outlines the methodology used to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of traditional and Web-based tobacco cessation and quitline promotion approaches.Methods: A mixed-methods study with three components was designed to address the effect of promotional activities on service usage and the comparative effectiveness of population-based smoking cessation activities across multiple states.Results/Findings: The cessation intervention component followed 7,902 smokers (4,307 quitline users and 3,595 Web intervention users) to ascertain prevalence of 30-day abstinence rates seven months after registering for smoking cessation services. User characteristics and quit success was compared across the two modalities. In the promotions component, reach and use of traditional and innovative promotion strategies were assessed for 24 states, including online advertising, state Web sites, social media, mobile applications, and their effects on quitline call volume. The partnership intervention component studied the extent of collaboration among six selected NCCCPs and NTCPs.Conclusions: This study will guide program staff and clinicians with evidence-based recommendations and best practices for implementation of tobacco cessation within their patient and community populations and establish an evidence base that can be used for decision making.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Blackwell ◽  
Sonia Saxena ◽  
Christopher Alexakis ◽  
Alex Bottle ◽  
Elizabeth Cecil ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e039775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanual Getnet Mersha ◽  
Parivash Eftekhari ◽  
Michelle Bovill ◽  
Daniel Nigusse Tollosa ◽  
Gillian Sandra Gould

IntroductionNicotine replacement therapy (NRT) has proven effective for smoking cessation in clinical trials, however it was found less effective in population-based studies, potentially due to inconsistent or incorrect use of NRT. The aim of this paper is to describe a systematic review protocol to evaluate level of adherence to NRT; the discrepancy of adherence to NRT in clinical and population-based studies and degree of association between level of adherence and success of smoking cessation.Methods and analysisLiterature search will use five databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO). Studies will be appraised for methodological quality using National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. To reduce heterogeneity, we will analyse clinical trials and population-based studies separately; pooled analyses will be done among studies that used similar measurements. Heterogeneity of studies will be assessed by Higgins’ I2 statistical test. When studies are adequately homogeneous, results will be pooled using random-effects model with proportion and ORs with 95% CIs and p values for each outcome. We will explain sources of heterogeneity by subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis. Funnel plots and Egger’s regression asymmetry test with p<0.05 will be used as a cut-off point to affirm presence of statistically significant publication bias. Statistical analyses will be carried out using Stata V.16 software. Only studies reporting a valid strategy to control for reverse causality will be included.DiscussionThis review will provide evidence to support the importance of adherence on rate of smoking cessation and level of adherence to NRT. The findings will be used to inform smoking cessation interventions, researchers and policymakers.Ethics and disseminationAs a systematic literature review, this protocol does not require ethics approval. Research outcomes will be presented at relevant conferences and findings will be published in a relevant peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020176749.


2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Michael O. Chaiton ◽  
Lori M. Diemert ◽  
Susan J. Bondy ◽  
K. Stephen Brown ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document