Revisiting Complexities in the Pediatric Subspecialty Workforce

Author(s):  
Adam Turner ◽  
Thomas Ricketts ◽  
Laurel K. Leslie
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 140A-140A
Author(s):  
Yasmin Hamzavi Abedi ◽  
Amy M. Perkins ◽  
Maripaz B. Morales

2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-649
Author(s):  
Ethel Clemente ◽  
Gordon Liu ◽  
Maria Demma Cabral

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W. McCrindle ◽  
Barbara Starfield ◽  
Catherine DeAngelis

This study was undertaken to describe subspecialty characteristics and practices of the population of pediatricians given the ongoing controversy regarding a projected manpower oversupply of general pediatricians. A questionnaire was mailed to a national random sample of 1620 United States physicians listed in the American Medical Association's Pysician Masterfile as being in office-based pediatric practice. The final response rate was 63%. Seventy percent of respondents designated their practices as "general pediatrics" versus 17% as "general pediatrics with a specific subspecialty interest" and 13% as "subspecialty practice." The general pediatricians with a specific subspecialty interest were intermediate in the proportion that had some training in a pediatric fellowship program (general pediatricians with a specific subspecialty interest, 63% versus general pediatricians, 14%, P < .0001, and pediatricians with a subspecialty practice, 92%, P < .0001) and that were certified in a pediatric subspecialty by the American Board of Pediatrics (general pediatricians with a specific subspecialty interest 16% versus general pediatricians, 2%, P < .0001, and pediatricians with subspecialty practice, 62%, P < .0001). They were also intermediate in the proportion involved in various academic pursuits. Their practices, however, more closely resembled general pediatricians than pediatricians with a subspeciality practice in their location, setting, associates, and commitment to primary care. They were more likely than general pediatricians to utilize or provide specialized tests or procedures. A large percentage of pediatricians incorporate subspecilaty elements into their general pediatric practices. Models of current and projected pediatric manpower supply need to be reassessed in light of this form of practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esti Iturralde ◽  
Rebecca N. Adams ◽  
Regan C. Barley ◽  
Rachel Bensen ◽  
Megan Christofferson ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S70-S75 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Freed ◽  
K. M. Dunham ◽  
L. M. Moran ◽  
L. Spera ◽  
G. A. McGuinness ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
S. Saini ◽  
S. Agrawal ◽  
B. Stockford ◽  
R. Bruce ◽  
R. Amin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084
Author(s):  
Linda Herbert ◽  
Steven Hardy

We evaluated the acceptability and usefulness of brief mental health screening during pediatric subspecialty clinic visits. Patients (8-17 years) and parents (of patients 5-17 years) in pediatric allergy, immunology, and hematology clinics completed the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pediatric Profile. Medical providers reviewed results and interpretations to guide discussion of mental health during visits. Almost all providers (96%) reported discussing mental health during visits but fewer parents (60%) said this discussion occurred. All parents who reported that mental health discussions occurred liked that this happened. Some parents (25%) who said no mental health discussion occurred wished it had. Most parents strongly agreed that screening completion was easy and appropriate. Most providers (79%) believed the screening was useful and 87% reported using screening results to guide discussion. Brief electronic mental health screening in pediatric subspecialty clinics is feasible, useful in guiding discussion, and viewed favorably by providers and parents of children with chronic illnesses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document