Factors Associated With Primary Nonresponsiveness to Antibiotics in Adults With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi Haijanen ◽  
Suvi Sippola ◽  
Eliisa Löyttyniemi ◽  
Saija Hurme ◽  
Juha Grönroos ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Virginia Durán Muñoz-Cruzado ◽  
Gregorio Anguiano-Diaz ◽  
Luis Tallón Aguilar ◽  
José Tinoco González ◽  
Alejandro Sánchez Arteaga ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvi Sippola ◽  
Juha Grönroos ◽  
Ville Sallinen ◽  
Tero Rautio ◽  
Pia Nordström ◽  
...  

IntroductionRecent studies show that antibiotic therapy is safe and feasible for CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Spontaneous resolution of acute appendicitis has already been observed over a hundred years ago. In CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (left-sided appendicitis), studies have shown no benefit from antibiotics compared with symptomatic treatment, but this shift from antibiotics to symptomatic treatment has not yet been widely implemented in clinical practice. Recently, symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis has been demonstrated in a Korean open-label study. However, a double-blinded placebo-controlled study to illustrate the role of antibiotics and spontaneous resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is still lacking.Methods and analysisThe APPAC III (APPendicitis ACuta III) trial is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority randomised study comparing antibiotic therapy with placebo in the treatment CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis aiming to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the resolution of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Adult patients (18–60 years) with CT scan-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis (the absence of appendicolith, abscess, perforation and tumour) will be enrolled in five Finnish university hospitals.Primary endpoint is success of the randomised treatment, defined as resolution of acute appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital without surgical intervention within 10 days after initiating randomised treatment (treatment efficacy). Secondary endpoints include postintervention complications, recurrent symptoms after treatment up to 1 year, late recurrence of acute appendicitis after 1 year, duration of hospital stay, sick leave, treatment costs and quality of life. A decrease of 15 percentage points in success rate is considered clinically important difference. The superiority of antibiotic treatment compared with placebo will be analysed using Fisher’s one-sided test and CI will be calculated for proportion difference.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Turku University Hospital and the Finnish Medicines Agency (FIMEA). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals.Trial registration numberNCT03234296; Pre-results.


JAMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 325 (4) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvi Sippola ◽  
Jussi Haijanen ◽  
Juha Grönroos ◽  
Tero Rautio ◽  
Pia Nordström ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baohong Yang ◽  
Lingjian Kong ◽  
Ullah Saif ◽  
Lixia Zhao ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
...  

Background and study aims: To assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) versus laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). Patients and methods: We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare ERAT and LA patients with uncomplicated AA from April 2017 to March 2020. We reviewed a total of 2880 patients with suspected acute appendicitis, of whom 422 patients with uncomplicated AA met the matching criteria (ERAT, 79; LA, 343), yielding 78 pairs of patients. Results: The rate of curative treatment within one year after ERAT was 92.1%; 95% CI, [83.8% - 96.3%]. The percentage of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≤ 3 at six hours after treatment was 94.7%; 95% CI [87.2% - 97.9%] in the ERAT group, and significantly higher than that in the LA group 83.3%; 95% CI [73.5% - 90.0%]. Median operative/procedure time and median hospital length of stay in the ERAT group were significantly lower compared to the LA group. At one year, the median recurrence time was 50 days (IQRs, 25-127) in the ERAT group. The overall adverse event rate was 24.3%; 95% CI [14.8% - 33.9%] in the LA group and 18.4%; 95% CI [9.7% - 27.1%] in the ERAT group, with no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: ERAT is a technically feasible method to treat uncomplicated AA compared to LA.


Author(s):  
Gulshan Ali Memon ◽  
Khawar Saeed Jamali ◽  
Syed Kashif Ali Shah ◽  
Habib ur Rehman ◽  
Shahnawaz Leghari ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Sabbagh ◽  
Loréna Masseline ◽  
Gérard Grelpois ◽  
Alexandre Ntouba ◽  
Jeanne Dembinski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document