Interventions for supporting women with decisions about mode of birth in a pregnancy after caesarean birth

Author(s):  
Dell Horey ◽  
Mary-Ann Davey ◽  
Rhonda Small ◽  
Michelle Kealy ◽  
Caroline A Crowther
2021 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish KC ◽  
Mats Målqvist ◽  
Amit Bhandari ◽  
Rejina Gurung ◽  
Omkar Basnet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since the Millennium Development Goal era, there have been several efforts to increase institutional births using demand side financing. Since 2005, Government of Nepal has implemented Maternity Incentive Scheme (MIS) to reduce out of pocket expenditure (OOPE) for institutional birth. We aim to assess OOPE among women who had institutional births and coverage of MIS in Nepal. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study in 12 hospitals of Nepal for a period of 18 months. All women who were admitted in the hospital for delivery and consented were enrolled into the study. Research nurses conducted pre-discharge interviews with women on costs paid for medical services and non-medical services. We analysed the out of pocket expenditure by mode of delivery, duration of stay and hospitals. We also analysed the coverage of maternal incentive scheme in these hospitals. Results Among the women (n-21,697) reporting OOPE, the average expenditure per birth was 41.5 USD with 36 % attributing to transportation cost. The median OOPE was highest in Bheri hospital (60.3 USD) in comparison with other hospitals. The OOPE increased by 1.5 USD (1.2, 1.8) with each additional day stay in the hospital. There was a difference in the OOPE by mode of delivery, duration of hospital-stay and hospital of birth. The median OOPE was high among the caesarean birth with 43.3 USD in comparison with vaginal birth, 32.6 USD. The median OOPE was 44.7 USD, if the women stayed for 7 days and 33.5 USD if the women stayed for 24 h. The OOPE increased by 1.5 USD with each additional day of hospital stay after 24 h. The coverage of maternal incentive was 96.5 % among the women enrolled in the study. Conclusions Families still make out of pocket expenditure for institutional birth with a large proportion attributed to hospital care. OOPE for institutional births varied by duration of stay and mode of birth. Given the near universal coverage of incentive scheme, there is a need to review the amount of re-imbursement done to women based on duration of stay and mode of birth.


Author(s):  
Jonathan West ◽  
Myles Taylor ◽  
Michael Magro

OBJECTIVE: To determine the true financial costs of Planned Caesarean Section and Planned Vaginal Birth in England for the year 2018/19 after accounting for litigation and compensation for harm (LCFH) DESIGN: Sensitivity analysis BACKGROUND: Average base costs per delivery remitted to NHS maternity providers for Planned Caesarean Birth (PCB) and Planned Vaginal Birth (PVB) in 2018/19 were £3,948 and £3,270 respectively leading to a perception that PCB is more costly than PVB. Indemnity costs potentially related to planned mode of delivery, however, add an average of £1,571/delivery to overall costs. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of costs according to planned mode of birth was performed based on data and previous research published by NHS Resolution and NHS England. Weighting of results according to PCB and PVB rates was performed in a manner similar to the sensitivity analysis of PCB v PVB (without accounting for LCFH) performed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2011 RESULTS: Additional costs of LCFH resulted in revised costs of £4,245 and £5,030 for PCB and PVB respectively – a cost advantage of £785 per delivery in favour of PCB. CONCLUSION: Providers should not be discouraged from offering or women refused PCB on grounds of cost.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rejina Gurung ◽  
◽  
Harriet Ruysen ◽  
Avinash K. Sunny ◽  
Louise T. Day ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns. Methods At one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017–July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health – ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth – as possible predictors for reporting poor care. Results Among 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = − 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = − 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01–0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births. Conclusions Measurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women’s age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0180846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ank de Jonge ◽  
Lilian Peters ◽  
Caroline C. Geerts ◽  
Jos J. M. van Roosmalen ◽  
Jos W. R. Twisk ◽  
...  

Midwifery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gunnervik ◽  
A. Josefsson ◽  
A. Sydsjö ◽  
G. Sydsjö
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susie Dzakpasu ◽  
John Fahey ◽  
Russell S Kirby ◽  
Suzanne C Tough ◽  
Beverley Chalmers ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Johansson ◽  
Ingegerd Hildingsson

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Perrotta ◽  
Mariana Romero ◽  
Yanina Sguassero ◽  
Cecilia Straw ◽  
Celina Gialdini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document