Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Author(s):  
Zhi Rui Zhou ◽  
Zhang Yu Zou ◽  
Jun Xia ◽  
Song Qu
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6523-6523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Petit ◽  
Anne WM Lee ◽  
Alexandra Carmel ◽  
Wai Tong Ng ◽  
Jun Ma ◽  
...  

6523 Background: Based on an individual patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of 20 randomized trials and 5,144 patients (pts), the MAC-NPC collaborative group has shown that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieved the highest survival benefit in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC; Ribassin-Majed JCO 2017). Here, we updated the meta-analysis with the addition of 8 trials. Methods: Trials of Radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (CT) in patients with non-metastatic NPC were identified and updated IPD obtained. Both Western and Chinese medical literatures were searched. Overall Survival (OS) was the main endpoint. Fixed and random-effects frequentist NMA models were applied, network heterogeneity and consistency were evaluated. P-score was used to rank the treatments. R software - netmeta package was used to perform the analyses. Treatments were grouped in the following categories: RT alone (RT), induction chemotherapy followed by RT (IC-RT), induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ICtax(-)-CRT), induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ICtax(+)-CRT), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT-AC) and RT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (RT-AC). Results: Overall 28 trials and 8,214 pts were included. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. There was no heterogeneity in the NMA. There was inconsistency in the main analysis, which disappeared after the exclusion of 2 outlier trials. ICtax(+)-CRT ranked the best treatment for OS with a P-Score of 91%. Hazard ratio [HR, 95% Confidence Interval] for ICtax(+)-CRT was 0.75 [0.59-0.96] compared to CRT and 0.92 [0.69-1.24] compared to CRT-AC (second best treatment in raking with a P-Score of 85%; see league table below). When the 2 types of IC were merged, CRT-AC ranked the first followed by IC-CRT with P-Scores of 93% and 86% respectively, with a HR of 0.97 [0.84-1.14] for CRT-AC vs. IC-CRT. Conclusions: This IPD NMA of the treatment of locally advanced NPC demonstrates that the addition of IC or AC to CRT improves disease control probability and survival over CRT alone. Data on progression-free survival, locoregional and distant control will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Teng Hwee Tan ◽  
Yu Yang Soon ◽  
Timothy Cheo ◽  
Lea Choung Wong ◽  
Yiat Horng Leong ◽  
...  

67 Background: To determine and compare the incremental clinical benefit (ICB) and costs of induction chemotherapy (IC) when added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), concurrent chemotherapy (CC) added to RT and CC + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) when added to RT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC). Methods: We searched phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which reported overall survival (OS) benefit with the use of IC, CC and CC+AC in LA-NPC. We quantified the ICB using the ASCO and ESMO value framework. We calculated the incremental drug costs in US dollars using the lowest average wholesale price reported in the Lexicomp drug database. Results: We identified three RCTs on IC, three RCTs on CC and four RCTs on CC + AC. The ICB was judged to be Grade A based on the ESMO framework. The ASCO Net Health Benefit Score (NHBS) ranged from 17.43 to 57.39. The incremental drug costs ranged from 133.46 to 626.14. There were no statistically significant differences in the means of NHBS [39.37 (IC) vs 37.61 (CC) vs 33.98 (CC+AC), P = 0.89] and costs [383 (IC) vs 253 (CC) vs 460 (CC+AC), P = 0.27] between these three approaches. There was no statistically significant correlation between ICB and costs. Conclusions: The magnitudes of ICB and incremental drug costs of adding of IC to CCRT, CC to RT and CC + AC to RT for LA NPC are not significantly different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document