scholarly journals Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 1057-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Jiang ◽  
Yuanyuan Huang ◽  
Shuang Ma ◽  
Mark Stacy ◽  
Zheng Shi ◽  
...  
Ecology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Lu ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Qiang Yang ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Yiqi Luo ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lukac ◽  
A. Lagomarsino ◽  
M. C. Moscatelli ◽  
P. De Angelis ◽  
M. F. Cotrufo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 276-277 ◽  
pp. 107635
Author(s):  
Chang Gyo Jung ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
Shuli Niu ◽  
Junyi Liang ◽  
Xuecheng Chen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 369 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 563-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Shik Nam ◽  
Jin-Hyeob Kwak ◽  
Sang-Sun Lim ◽  
Woo-Jung Choi ◽  
Sun-Il Lee ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 342 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 59-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Yong Kim ◽  
Sang-Sun Lim ◽  
Jin-Hyeob Kwak ◽  
Dong-Suk Lee ◽  
Sang-Mo Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (23) ◽  
pp. 4577-4599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ensheng Weng ◽  
Ray Dybzinski ◽  
Caroline E. Farrior ◽  
Stephen W. Pacala

Abstract. Competition is a major driver of carbon allocation to different plant tissues (e.g., wood, leaves, fine roots), and allocation, in turn, shapes vegetation structure. To improve their modeling of the terrestrial carbon cycle, many Earth system models now incorporate vegetation demographic models (VDMs) that explicitly simulate the processes of individual-based competition for light and soil resources. Here, in order to understand how these competition processes affect predictions of the terrestrial carbon cycle, we simulate forest responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] along a nitrogen availability gradient, using a VDM that allows us to compare fixed allocation strategies vs. competitively optimal allocation strategies. Our results show that competitive and fixed strategies predict opposite fractional allocation to fine roots and wood, though they predict similar changes in total net primary production (NPP) along the nitrogen gradient. The competitively optimal allocation strategy predicts decreasing fine root and increasing wood allocation with increasing nitrogen, whereas the fixed strategy predicts the opposite. Although simulated plant biomass at equilibrium increases with nitrogen due to increases in photosynthesis for both allocation strategies, the increase in biomass with nitrogen is much steeper for competitively optimal allocation due to its increased allocation to wood. The qualitatively opposite fractional allocation to fine roots and wood of the two strategies also impacts the effects of elevated [CO2] on plant biomass. Whereas the fixed allocation strategy predicts an increase in plant biomass under elevated [CO2] that is approximately independent of nitrogen availability, competition leads to higher plant biomass response to elevated [CO2] with increasing nitrogen availability. Our results indicate that the VDMs that explicitly include the effects of competition for light and soil resources on allocation may generate significantly different ecosystem-level predictions of carbon storage than those that use fixed strategies.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ensheng Weng ◽  
Ray Dybzinski ◽  
Caroline E. Farrior ◽  
Stephen W. Pacala

Abstract. Competition is a major driver of carbon allocation to different plant tissues (e.g. wood, leaves, fine roots), and allocation, in turn, shapes vegetation structure. To improve their modeling of the terrestrial carbon cycle, many Earth system models now incorporate vegetation demographic models (VDMs) that explicitly simulate the processes of individual-based competition for light and soil resources. Here, in order to understand how these competition processes affect predictions of the terrestrial carbon cycle, we simulate forest responses to elevated CO2 along a nitrogen availability gradient using a VDM that allows us to compare fixed allocation strategies versus competitively-optimal allocation strategies. Our results show that competitive- and fixed-allocation strategies predict opposite fractional allocation to fine roots and wood, though they predict similar changes in total NPP along the nitrogen gradient. The competitively-optimal allocation strategy predicts decreasing fine root and increasing wood allocation with increasing nitrogen, whereas the fixed allocation strategy predicts the opposite. Although simulated plant biomass at equilibrium increases with nitrogen due to increases in photosynthesis for both allocation strategies, the increase in biomass with nitrogen is much steeper for competitively-optimal allocation due to its increased allocation to wood. The qualitatively opposite fractional allocation to fine roots and wood of the two strategies also impacts the effects of elevated [CO2] on plant biomass. Whereas the fixed allocation strategy predicts an increase in plant biomass under elevated [CO2] that is approximately independent of nitrogen availability, competition’s effect on wood allocation amplifies plant biomass under elevated [CO2] with increasing nitrogen availability. Our results indicate that the VDMs that explicitly include the effects of competition for light and soil resources on plant strategies may generate significantly different ecosystem-level predictions than those that use fixed allocation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document