Methodological Pluralism

2012 ◽  
pp. 227-244
Author(s):  
Umi Khattab
Keyword(s):  
Methodological Pluralism

J. M. Keynes as the Last Economist of Mainstream and a Precursor of Theoretical and Methodological Pluralism

2008 ◽  
pp. 120-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Economic Science ◽  
Methodological Pluralism ◽  
Current State ◽  
Science In Russia ◽  
The Difference

The article shows the methodological ambiguity of Keynes’ ideas. The simplified treatment of his views on the part of his followers is criticized. The author shows the difference between Keynes’ methodological disputes with classics and his debate with mathematical economists and econometricians, in particular with J. Tinbergen. It is shown that methodological discussions of 1930-1940 are actual for the assessment of the current state of economic science in Russia.

Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism. Paul A. Roth

Ethics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-435
Author(s):  
Arthur L. Stinchcombe
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Methodological Pluralism ◽  
The Social

Applying methodological pluralism to wildlife and the economy

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1610-1616
Author(s):  
Shekhar K. Niraj ◽  
Vikram Dayal ◽  
Paul R. Krausman
Keyword(s):  
Methodological Pluralism

Reflexive Methodological Pluralism: The Case of Environmental Valuation.

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florin Popa ◽  
Mathieu Guillermin
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Valuation ◽  
Methodological Pluralism

scholarly journals Methodological Pluralism and Pluralism of Method

2012 ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila C. Dow
Keyword(s):  
Methodological Pluralism

Methodological pluralism through the lens of the buddhist doctrine of time kālacakra: an interview with dr. Jensine Andresen

2021 ◽  
Vol - (2) ◽  
pp. 165-183
Author(s):  
Olena Kalantarova
Keyword(s):  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
The United States ◽  
Religious Studies ◽  
Western Science ◽  
Methodological Pluralism ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Tibetan Buddhist ◽  
Buddhist Doctrine ◽  
Canonical Literature

Modern dialogue between Western science and Buddhism raises an enormous range of cognitive issues that require interdisciplinary research. The idea of methodological pluralism (MP) arises here as an effective solution for such projects. Having immersed in the study of the background of its opponent, Western science touched the fairly old and specific way of reality cognition, which in certain aspects actually can be identified as a Tibetan-Buddhist version of the MP. In an interview with the professor from the United States, who for many decades has been engaged in research on the boundaries of various science disciplines, ethics, and religious studies, we tried to clarify the specifics of this so-called version of MP, which is set out in the Buddhist doctrine of time, K lacakra. Texts of this doctrine are included in the corpus of Buddhist canonical literature and form the basis for two classical Buddhist sciences: the science of stars (which is actually “social astronomy”); and the science of healing (which looks like a certain version of “psycho-medicine”). During the interview, we went directly to the possibility of using the Buddhist version of MP at least within the dialogue “Buddhism-Science”, to the need to understand the specifics of such an implementation, and to the mandatory combination of MP with an integrated approach. The interview was intended to raise the question that deals with transgressing the abovementioned dialogue from the “consumer” level (when we are looking for something that could be useful to the Western neuro-cognitivist) to the philosophical one, in order to formulate a criterion for recognizing a different way of thinking, and finally, to move on toward the semantic discussion, without which the integration phase of any kind of MP is impossible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document