Press Councils

Author(s):  
Tobias Eberwein
Keyword(s):  
1978 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude-Jean Bertrand
Keyword(s):  

1974 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Polich

National survey finds publishers will cooperate, print critical findings despite their disapproval of local, state and national councils.


1978 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-39

Ben H. Bakdikian, reporter, editor and contributor to many national magazines, was cited as “journalism's most perceptive critic” at the annual awards luncheon sponsored by the American Society of Journalism School Administrators during the 1978 convention of the Association for Education in Journalism in Seattle. The citation was presented before a standing-room-only crowd by Joe W. Milner of Arizona State University, 1977–78 president of ASJSA. Currently a professor of journalism at the University of California at Berkeley, Bagdikian has been a newsman since he began with the Springfield (Mass.) Morning Union in 1941. He was on the staff of the Providence (R. I.) Journal and Bulletin for 15 years. Bagdikian's interest as a media critic soared in the 1960s when he became a contributing editor to the Saturday Evening Post. He was later assistant managing editor and ombudsman for the Washington Post. Bagdikian's nomination for the ASJSA award stated that he has demonstrated in many ways the necessity of critical evaluation of the performance of all those associated with journalism. “Though many may disagree with his assessments,” the nomination said, “few can fail to react in some way to his judgments concerning the press and its practitioners.” A spokesman for press councils, Bagdikian was project director for the three-year study on newspaper survival sponsored by the Merkle Foundation. The Pulitzer Prize winner is also author of five books, including The Information Machines: Their Impact on Men and the Media.


Politics ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Les Cleveland

Author(s):  
Colin Porlezza

Accuracy is a central norm in journalism and at the heart of the journalistic practice. As a norm, accuracy developed out of objectivity, and has therefore an Anglo-American origin. Nevertheless, the commitment to the rule of getting it right is shared among journalists across different journalistic cultures. The history of accuracy is closely related to other central concepts in journalism like truthfulness, factuality and credibility, because it raises epistemological questions of whether and how journalism is capable of depicting reality accurately, truthfully and based on fact. Accuracy plays a particularly important role with regard to the factuality of the journalistic discourse, as it forces journalists not only to ground their reporting on facts, but to check whether presented facts are true or not—which is reflected both in the description of the journalistic profession as the discipline of verification as well as the central relevance of accuracy for instruments of media self-regulation like press councils and codes of ethics. Accuracy is an important standard to determine the quality of the news reporting. In fact, many studies, most of them carried out Western democracies, have investigated the accuracy of journalistic reporting based on the number of errors that sources mentioned in the articles perceived. As journalism moved online and the immediacy of the news cycle requested a faster pace of publication, news outlets often adopted the strategy to publish first and to verify second, although research has shown that the accuracy of journalistic reporting and trustfulness are related. Especially in the current debate on disinformation, many online fact-checking and verification services have thus seen a global rise of attention and importance.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241389
Author(s):  
Bartosz Wilczek

This study develops and tests a theoretical framework, which draws on herd behavior literature and explains how and under what conditions tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation. More specifically, the study analyzes all cases of political and business misinformation in Switzerland and the U.K. between 2002 and 2018, which are selected based on corresponding Swiss and U.K. press councils’ rulings (N = 114). The findings show that during amplifying events (i.e., election campaigns and economic downturns) tabloids allocate more attention to political and business misinformation, which, in turn, drives broadsheets to allocate more attention to the misinformation as well–and especially if the misinformation serves broadsheets’ ideological goals. Moreover, the findings show differences between Swiss and U.K. media markets only in the case of business misinformation and suggest that the attention allocation process depends in particular on the strength of the amplifying event in a media market. Thereby, this study contributes to the understanding of how and under what conditions misinformation spreads in media markets.


2020 ◽  
pp. 63-84
Author(s):  
Crime Coverage

The makeup of the press councils in Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands, and their accountability systems, are described. News organizations in Protector countries earn trust, at least in part, by acknowledging that the public has the right to a voice in how news is produced and presented. The nature and effects of story frames are discussed. The coverage of the years-long trial in Germany of the National Socialist Underground (NSU) members accused of killing immigrants is explored for what it says about immigration and mainstream media’s handling of it. This chapter considers how globalization and immigration threaten both the posture of criminal justice systems and the protective press practices that reflect and reinforce those policies. Using the works of Emmanuel Levinas and James Carey, this chapter explores the ethical grounds for policy in these countries and consider the comparative work about prisons and attitudes toward crime by Michael Tondry and his colleagues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document