Defining Risk Assessment Criteria

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-91
Author(s):  
Bruce Lyon
1997 ◽  
pp. 122-154
Author(s):  
Nigel Parton ◽  
David Thorpe ◽  
Corinne Wattam

Author(s):  
Gunnar Weigold ◽  
Colin Argent ◽  
John Healy ◽  
Ian Diggory

ROSEN have developed together with MACAW Engineering Ltd. a Risk Assessment Tool that can be applied to both piggable and un-piggable pipelines. The Risk Model is structured to answer three basic questions relating to pipeline integrity: • What threats are active on the pipeline? • Will the active threats result in a leak or a rupture? • What is the company liability (cost) in the event of a failure? The risk assessment criteria on which the model is based are taken from codes and technical papers that have become accepted as industry norms. The Risk Model itself is semi-quantitative and is based on input data that operators should have for all pipelines. The results of the risk assessment provide an objective identification of active threats to pipeline integrity and a first level benchmarking of the operators procedures with regards to industry best practice. The paper will present the fast and robust Risk Assessment Approach and illustrate it’s application by different examples as it was used to identify and prioritize active threats mechanism to optimize maintenance expenditures for effective preservation of pipeline integrity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1001 ◽  
pp. 484-491
Author(s):  
Marcela Malindžáková ◽  
Andrea Rosová

The aim of this article is to describe the optimization of ashes processing technological line. The statistical and economic tool (risk assessment criteria) that is used in this article help to identify weaknesses in the ashes processing, managing process and potential risks and bottlenecks, thus helping to achieve better control over the process, minimizing the impact on the environment. Keywords: Ash processing, Waste storage, Risk assessment.


2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Badovinac ◽  
Kelly E. Morgan ◽  
Joyce Lefevre ◽  
Sangeeta Wadhawan ◽  
Lorelei Mucci ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
O. А. Yurchenko ◽  
О. А. Svyryda

Implementation of the system for administering value added tax for the domestic business sector was an IMF requirement. However, its applications by business entities could not eliminate “tax heavens”, barter deals and purchase (sale) of doubtful tax credit. It was in 1 July 2017 that the system for computerized monitoring of the conformity of tax bills (TB) / calculation of adjustment (CA) to the risk assessment criteria sufficient to stop registration of such TB / CA in the Single Register of Tax Bills was launched. The article’s objective is to form the authors’ vision of the essence of the problem related with registration and blocking of TB and CA in the Single Register of Tax Bills.  The following aspects are covered by the analysis: the nomenclature of indicators checked in TB / CA deciphered upon coming to the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine; the types of receipts on the results of computerized check, intended for VAT payers; the detailed list of criteria for exclusion of TB / CA from the monitoring by the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (once these criteria are not met, TB / CA is to become subject to monitoring and check for the riskiness of taxpayer and its operations, i. e. the criteria of fictitious business); the indicators of the positive story of a taxpayer. The issues of identifying the taxpayer risks that can be subject to scrutiny by the State Fiscal Service are highlighted. The criteria determining the positive tax story of a taxpayer are given. It is concluded that all the TB and CA submitted for registration in the Single Register of Tax Bills are to be checked for the conformity to three legally defined essential criteria; once TB / CA does not meet these criteria, they will be subject to monitoring and check for conformity with the criteria of riskiness of taxpayer and operations and the indicators of positive taxpayer story. The positive taxpayer story can rescue a VAT payer from blocking of its TB / CA that meet the riskiness of operation criterion. But once a taxpayer gets on the list of risky business entities, registration of its TB / CA will always be blocked.      


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document