scholarly journals Testing and transfer: Retrieval practice effects across test formats in English vocabulary learning in school

Author(s):  
Jonathan Barenberg ◽  
Timo Berse ◽  
Laura Reimann ◽  
Stephan Dutke

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Pyc ◽  
Katherine A. Rawson


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara M. van Peppen ◽  
Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen ◽  
Anita Heijltjes ◽  
Eva Janssen ◽  
Tamara van Gog

There is a need for effective methods to teach critical thinking. Many studies on other skills have demonstrated beneficial effects of practice that repeatedly induces retrieval processes (repeated retrieval practice). The present experiment investigated whether repeated retrieval practice is effective for fostering critical thinking skills, focusing on avoiding biased reasoning. Seventy-five students first took a pre-test. Subsequently, they were instructed on critical thinking and avoiding belief-bias in syllogistic reasoning and engaged in retrieval practice with syllogisms. Afterwards, depending on the assigned condition, they (1) did not engage in extra retrieval practice; (2) engaged in retrieval practiced a second time (week later); or (3) engaged in retrieval practiced a second (week later) and a third time (two weeks later). Two/three days after the last practice session, all participants took a post-test consisting of practiced tasks (to measure learning relative to the pre-test) and non-practiced (transfer) tasks. Results revealed no significant difference between the pretest and the posttest learning performance as judged by the mean total performance (MC-answers + justification), although participants were, on average, faster on the post-test than on the pre-test. Exploring performance on MC-answers-only suggested that participants did benefit from instruction/practice but may have been unable to justify their answers. Unfortunately, we were unable to test effects on transfer due to a floor effect, which highlights the difficulty of establishing transfer of critical thinking skills. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that addresses repeated retrieval practice effects in the critical thinking domain. Further research should focus on determining the preconditions of repeated retrieval practice effects for this type of tasks.





2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janell R. Blunt ◽  
Afrida Rahman ◽  
Jeffrey D. Karpicke


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 700-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole A. M. C. Goossens ◽  
Gino Camp ◽  
Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen ◽  
Huib K. Tabbers ◽  
Samantha Bouwmeester ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Harrington ◽  
Wenying Jiang

This study examines the effect of recognition-based retrieval practice on vocabulary learning in a university Chinese class. Students (N=26) were given practice retrieving new vocabulary (single or two-character words) in a series of simple form recognition tests administered over four weeks. The test sets consisted of target vocabulary that appeared in the previous week’s lesson and distracter items drawn from upcoming vocabulary. Tests were group-administered via PowerPoint and students used a checklist response to indicate whether a given item had appeared in the previous week’s material. Responses relied on episodic knowledge of previous exposure and required no processing of semantic information. Students were able to reliably identify the target items in the retrieval task with performance on these items being found superior to that for supplementary list control words on midterm and final vocabulary tests. The findings indicate that a focus on word forms can have a measurable effect on vocabulary learning in the classroom and underscores the efficacy of retrievalbased testing (the testing effect, Barcroft, 2007; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006) in facilitating vocabulary learning. The implications for recognition-based retrieval practice in vocabulary instruction in the Chinese classroom are discussed.



2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gino Camp ◽  
Nicole A. M. C. Goossens ◽  
Peter Verkoeijen ◽  
Huib K. Tabbers ◽  
Rolf Zwaan


Author(s):  
Gesa S. E. van den Broek ◽  
Tamara van Gog ◽  
Evelien Jansen ◽  
Mirja Pleijsant ◽  
Liesbeth Kester


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1036-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua W. Whiffen ◽  
Jeffrey D. Karpicke


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document