Agricultural Supply Management and Market Power: Evidence from the U.S. Dairy and Potato Industries

Agribusiness ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya V. Bolotova
Agribusiness ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanjin Chung ◽  
Seongjin Park ◽  
Jungmin Lee
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Seldon ◽  
Chulho Jung ◽  
Roberto J. Cavazos
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A Montgomery

This paper documents the significant presence of diversified firms in the U.S. economy and presents three views on why firms diversify. The market power view argues that firms diversify to wield conglomerate power across markets. The agency view argues that diversification is undertaken by managers pursuing their own interests at the expense of the firm's owners. The resource view argues that firms diversify in response to excess capacity in productive factors. A review of recent empirical research finds little support for the market-power view and a substantial amount of evidence that is consistent with the agency and resource views.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Nebesky ◽  
B. Starr McMullen ◽  
Man-Keung Lee

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Villoria ◽  
Rachael Garrett ◽  
Florian Gollnow ◽  
Kimberly Carlson

Abstract Supply chain policies that leverage the upstream market power of trading companies and importing countries offer great promise to address forest clearing1,2 in regions of rapid commodity expansion but weak forest governance3,4. Yet leakage—when deforestation is not eliminated but instead pushed to other regions—is a potentially major but unquantified factor that could dilute the global effectiveness of regionally successful supply chain policies5,6. We find substantial domestic leakage rates (43-50%) induced by zero deforestation policy implementation in Brazil’s soy sector, but insignificant cross-border leakage (<3%) due to the interdependence of soy production in the U.S. and Brazil. Currently implemented zero-deforestation policies in the Brazilian soy sector offset 0.9% of global and 4% of Brazilian deforestation from 2011-2016. However, completely eliminating deforestation from the supply chains of all firms exporting soy to the EU or China over the same period could have reduced global deforestation by 2% and Brazilian deforestation by 9%. If major tropical commodity importers adopt policies that require traders to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains, as currently proposed in the EU, it could help bend the curve on global forest loss.


2019 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 138-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Kanieski Silva ◽  
Frederick W. Cubbage ◽  
Ronalds Gonzalez ◽  
Robert C. Abt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document