scholarly journals Classification accuracy of the English version of the Canadian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (CICA) in a majority culture memory clinic sample

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. O'Connell ◽  
Jennifer D. Walker ◽  
Kristen Jacklin ◽  
Carrie Ann Bourassa ◽  
Andrew Kirk ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-168
Author(s):  
Victor Michael Aziz ◽  
Padmavathy Srinivasalu Gopinath ◽  
Georgia Baily

Early diagnosis of dementia enables early intervention and gives people the opportunity to make choices and plan for their future. Such an early diagnosis requires accurate assessment. A clinical assessment in people with suspected dementia in a memory clinic setting should include a clinical interview of the patient and their next of kin, a physical and neurological examination, cognitive assessment with appropriate cognitive tests, blood investigations, ECG (electrocardiography), and brain imaging.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Larner

The diagnostic accuracy of the short Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA), a cognitive screening instrument recently derived by item response theory and computerized adaptive testing from the original MoCA, for the diagnosis of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was assessed in 2 patient cohorts referred to a dedicated memory clinic in order to examine the validity and reproducibility of s-MoCA. Diagnosis used standard clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia and MCI as reference standard (prevalence of cognitive impairment = 0.43 and 0.46 in each cohort, respectively). There were significant differences in s-MoCA test scores for dementia, MCI, and subjective memory impairment ( P ≤ .01), and s-MoCA effect sizes (Cohen d) were medium to large (range: 0.65-1.42) for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI. Using the cut-off for s-MoCA specified in the index study, it proved highly sensitive (>0.9) for diagnosis of dementia but with poor specificity (≤0.25), with moderate sensitivity (≥0.75) and specificity (≥0.60) for diagnosis of MCI. In conclusion, in these pragmatic diagnostic test accuracy studies, s-MoCA proved acceptable and sensitive for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment in a memory clinic setting, with a performance similar to that of the original MoCA.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Larner

ABSTRACTBackground: This aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening instrument for cognitive impairment in patients referred to a memory clinic, alone and in combination with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).Methods: This was a pragmatic prospective study of consecutive referrals attending a memory clinic (n = 150) over an 18-month period. Patients were diagnosed using standard clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia (DSM-IV) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI; cognitive impairment prevalence = 43%) independent of MoCA test scores.Results: MoCA proved acceptable to patients and was quick and easy to use. Using the cut-offs for MoCA and MMSE specified in the index paper (≥26/30), MoCA was more sensitive than MMSE (0.97 vs 0.65) but less specific (0.60 vs 0.89), with better diagnostic accuracy (area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 0.91 vs 0.83). Downward adjustment of the MoCA cut-off to ≥20/30 maximized test accuracy and improved specificity (0.95) for some loss of sensitivity (0.63). Combining MoCA with the MMSE – either in series or in parallel – did not improve diagnostic utility above that with either test alone.Conclusions: In a memory clinic population, MoCA proved sensitive for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Use of a cut-off lower than that specified in the index study may be required to improve overall test accuracy and specificity for some loss of sensitivity in populations with a high prior probability of cognitive impairment. Combining the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) with the MMSE did not improve diagnostic utility.


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Leng Fung ◽  
Kelly E.T. Ng ◽  
Simon J. Vogrin ◽  
Catherine Meade ◽  
Michael Ngo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C. Eckerström ◽  
J. Svensson ◽  
P. Kettunen ◽  
M. Jonsson ◽  
M. Eckerström
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Karl S. Grewal ◽  
Megan E. O’Connell ◽  
Andrew Kirk ◽  
Stuart W. S. MacDonald ◽  
Debra Morgan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document