Comprehensive estimates of seabird-fishery interactions for the US Northeast and mid-Atlantic

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Hatch
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Friedland ◽  
Ryan E. Morse ◽  
Nancy Shackell ◽  
Jamie C. Tam ◽  
Janelle L. Morano ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 4427-4461 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. P. Canty ◽  
L. Hembeck ◽  
T. P. Vinciguerra ◽  
D. C. Anderson ◽  
D. L. Goldberg ◽  
...  

Abstract. Regulatory air quality models, such as the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQ), are used by federal and state agencies to guide policy decisions that determine how to best achieve adherence with National Ambient Air Quality Standards for surface ozone. We use observations of ozone and its important precursor NO2 to test the representation of the photochemistry and emission of ozone precursors within CMAQ. Observations of tropospheric column NO2 from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), retrieved by two independent groups, show that the model overestimates urban NO2 and underestimates rural NO2 under all conditions examined for July and August 2011 in the US Northeast. The overestimate of the urban to rural ratio of tropospheric column NO2 for this baseline run of CMAQ (CB05 mechanism, mobile NOx emissions from the National Emissions Inventory; isoprene emissions from MEGAN v2.04) suggests this model may under estimate the importance of interstate transport of NOx. This CMAQ simulation leads to a considerable overestimate of the 2 month average of 8 h daily maximum surface ozone in the US Northeast, as well as an overestimate of 8 h ozone at AQS sites during days when the state of Maryland experienced NAAQS exceedances. We have implemented three changes within CMAQ motivated by OMI NO2 as well as aircraft observations obtained in July 2011 during the NASA DISCOVER-AQ campaign: (a) the modeled lifetime of organic nitrates within CB05 has been reduced by a factor of 10, (b) emissions of NOx from mobile sources has been reduced by a factor of 2, and (c) isoprene emissions have been reduced by using MEGAN v2.10 rather than v2.04. Compared to the baseline simulation, the CMAQ run using all three of these changes leads to a considerably better simulation of the ratio of urban to rural column NO2, better agreement with the 2 month average of daily 8 h maximum ozone in the US Northeast, fewer number of false positives of an ozone exceedance throughout the domain, as well as an unbiased simulation of surface ozone at ground based AQS sites in Maryland that experienced an ozone exceedance during July and August 2007. These modifications to CMAQ may provide a framework for use in studies focused on achieving future adherence to specific air quality standards for surface ozone by reducing emission of NOx from various anthropogenic sectors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo K. Valente ◽  
Matthew J. Mimiaga ◽  
Kenneth H. Mayer ◽  
Steve A. Safren ◽  
Katie B. Biello

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja K. Gu ◽  
Luenda E. Charles ◽  
Ronald Klein ◽  
Lisa M. Grady ◽  
Claudia C. Ma ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 47-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Friedland ◽  
Robert T. Leaf ◽  
Joe Kane ◽  
Desiree Tommasi ◽  
Rebecca G. Asch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
D. Damery ◽  
J. Benjamin ◽  
M. Kelty ◽  
R. J. Lilieholm
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
OCTO

Using the recent ocean planning process in the US Northeast, this paper assesses the perspectives of stakeholders who did not participate in a marine spatial planning (MSP) process. Since it is more challenging to find and survey stakeholders who did not participate in a process than ones who did, the authors chose a smaller study area – Massachusetts Bay – to examine. They conducted a scoping survey (235 respondents) to understand respondents’ relationships with the marine environment, their understanding of MSP, and why they did or did not participate in the Northeast regional ocean planning process. In addition, the authors held three focus groups (21 participants total) to further explore participants’ understanding of the planning process and their perceptions of the process. The scoping survey was “not intended to be representative”, and focus group participants were chosen from scoping survey respondents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1452 ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
Boma Kresning ◽  
M Reza Hashemi ◽  
Clara Gallucci
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document