Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. F. M. Kok ◽  
I. H. J. T. de Hingh
Keyword(s):  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Origin

Peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin – cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The financial aspect

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tomasz Jastrzębski ◽  
Marek Bębenek
Keyword(s):  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Medical Procedures ◽  
Financial Loss ◽  
Colorectal Origin ◽  
Crs And Hipec ◽  
Financial Aspect

About 10% to 15% of patients with colon cancer have intraperitoneal metastases at diagnosis. The patients with intraperitoneal metastases and without distant metastases can benefit from cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Because up to a half of patients live for at least 5 years after this treatment, the treatment is used more and more often. The treatment of patients with intraperitoneal metastases with CRS and HIPEC costs more than the majority of other medical procedures, because CRS is extensive and takes a lot of time, and after surgery, patients need intensive care and expensive medications and equipment. Currently, only 40% to 80% of costs of CRS and HIPEC are reimbursed in Poland. Because CRS and HIPEC mean a financial loss to hospitals, they are rarely performed. We analyzed the costs of treating patients with peritoneal metastases by CRS and HIPEC in two centers (Gdank, Wroclaw) and showed how this treatment is reimbursed outside Poland. We discussed whether adequate qualification of patients and experience of the teams giving the treatment could reduce the costs.

Outcomes Following Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with and without Diaphragmatic Resection in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Nikiforchin ◽  
Vadim Gushchin ◽  
Michelle Sittig ◽  
Ekaterina Baron ◽  
Felipe Lopez-Ramirez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases

scholarly journals Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: where is the limit?

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S779
Author(s):  
L. Carrion-Alvarez ◽  
J.A. Martinez-Piñeiro-Muñoz ◽  
I. Manzanedo-Romero ◽  
V. Antolin-Sanchez ◽  
P. Haro-Preston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases

Utility of chemotherapy given before and/or after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16276-e16276
Author(s):  
Tyler Friedrich ◽  
Junxiao Hu ◽  
Robert William Lentz ◽  
Alexis Diane Leal ◽  
Sunnie S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Histologic Grade ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma

e16276 Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinoma is relatively rare and often diagnosed incidentally during operations for acute appendicitis. It is commonly associated, either at time of initial presentation or upon recurrence, with peritoneal metastases. A typical treatment strategy for patients with peritoneal disease includes cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Extrapolating largely from literature in colorectal cancer, chemotherapy is frequently given before and/or after CRS/HIPEC though high-level evidence to support this is lacking. We sought to evaluate the effect of systemic chemotherapy on survival. Methods: Utilizing a database of CRS/HIPEC procedures at University of Colorado Hospital from 2008 to present we retrospectively reviewed cases of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Data collected included staging, histologic grade, chemotherapy given, surgical outcomes, and time to disease recurrence. Patients without adequate information regarding treatment, or without at least 1 year of clinical follow-up, were excluded. Associations between administration of chemotherapy or histologic grade and 1-year DFS were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression was used to assess whether 1-year DFS were different in chemotherapy-treated patients when adjusted for histologic grade. Results: In total, 117 cases reviewed indicated an appendiceal pathology. Of these, 54 cases in a total of 51 patients met the specified criteria for pathology and completeness and length of follow-up information. The average age was 58 years (range 26-81 years). Adenocarcinoma was graded as low in 15 (28%) cases, intermediate in 18 (33%) cases, and high in 21 (39%) cases. 23 (43%) patients received no chemotherapy while 31 (57%) received chemotherapy before and/or after surgery. In the overall population, there was no significant effect of chemotherapy on survival, with 1-year DFS demonstrated in 74.2% of patients receiving some chemotherapy and 70% in patients not receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.765). One-year DFS was achieved in 86% of low-grade cases, 61% of intermediate-grade cases, and 71% of high-grade cases, though this was also not statistically significant (p = 0.254). Furthermore, when 1-year DFS between chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy patients was adjusted for grade, there was again no significant interaction (odds ratio = 0.48, 95% C.I. (0.13-1.64), p = 0.763). Conclusions: In this small, single-institution experience of patients with peritoneal appendiceal adenocarcinoma, there was no significant effect of chemotherapy administration on 1-year DFS. These findings are likely affected by significant confounding with the small sample size and retrospective nature of the data. Further investigation on a larger scale is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document