Radiological prediction of avascular necrosis in femoral neck fractures

1965 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 675-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Piggott
2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (4) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Kalsbeek ◽  
A. D. P. van Walsum ◽  
J. P. A. M. Vroemen ◽  
H. M. J. Janzing ◽  
J. T. Winkelhorst ◽  
...  

AimsThe objective of this study was to investigate bone healing after internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) with the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP) in a young patient population treated by various orthopaedic (trauma) surgeons.Patients and MethodsWe present a multicentre prospective case series with a follow-up of one year. All patients aged ≤ 60 years with a displaced FNF treated with the DLBP between 1st August 2010 and December 2014 were included. Patients with pathological fractures, concomitant fractures of the lower limb, symptomatic arthritis, local infection or inflammation, inadequate local tissue coverage, or any mental or neuromuscular disorder were excluded. Primary outcome measure was failure in fracture healing due to nonunion, avascular necrosis, or implant failure requiring revision surgery.ResultsIn total, 106 consecutive patients (mean age 52 years, range 23 to 60; 46% (49/106) female) were included. The failure rate was 14 of 106 patients (13.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1 to 19.9). Avascular necrosis occurred in 11 patients (10.4%), nonunion in six (5.6%), and loss of fixation in two (1.9%).ConclusionThe rate of fracture healing after DLBP fixation of displaced femoral neck fracture in young patients is promising and warrants further investigation by a randomized trial to compare the performance against other contemporary methods of fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:443–9.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schmaranzer ◽  
L. Arendt ◽  
T.D. Lerch ◽  
S.D. Steppacher ◽  
K. Nuss ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 525-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.E Nikolopoulos ◽  
S.A Papadakis ◽  
K.T Kateros ◽  
G.S Themistocleous ◽  
J.A Vlamis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-134
Author(s):  
Ali Yeganeh ◽  
◽  
Mehdi Moghtadaei ◽  
Amir Sobhani ◽  
Mehdi Abbasi ◽  
...  

Background: Despite the advances in the methods of treating femoral neck fractures, treating some types of these fractures is still challenging. Therefore, understanding these fractures, their treatments, and the ways to control their complications are necessary for the orthopedists.  Objectives: In this study, we evaluate patients with acute femoral neck fractures with respect to the type of fractures and complications. Methods: In a 4-year cross-sectional study, the patients with acute femoral neck fractures who were admitted to Rasoul Akram Hospital were selected. Anatomical features and the type of fracture were determined by using plain radiography and CT scan. Fractures were classified according to the Garden classification. The patients were also evaluated for any postoperative complications for at least 6 months. Results: A total of 124 patients were enrolled. The Mean±SD age of the patients was 64.9±12.7 years and 87 (74.4%) were male. Based on the Garden classification, 7 fractures (5.9%) belonged to type I, 10 fractures (8.5%) to type II, 48 fractures (41%) to type III, and 52 fractures (44.4%) to type IV. Avascular necrosis in 28 cases (23.9%), non-union in 14 cases (12%), and claudication and pain in 35 cases (29.9%) were noted. The mean age of patients was different between fracture groups (P=0.01).  Conclusion: Our results showed that most of the patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Rasoul Akram Hospital were associated with displacement. In this study, the most common complications were pain and claudication, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and nonunion. In sum, further displacement of the fracture will result in more complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document