99mTc-labelled HIDA scintigraphy in assessment of bile leakage after removal of T tube from the common bile duct

1989 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 1319-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ryttov ◽  
L. Rasmussen ◽  
S. A. Pedersen ◽  
E. Öster-Jörgensen
1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Serra ◽  
A. Caballero ◽  
J. A. Del Olmo ◽  
L. Aparisi ◽  
M. S. Gilabert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Tube ◽  

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 138-141
Author(s):  
Radoje Colovic ◽  
Vladimir Radak ◽  
Nikica Grubor ◽  
Slavko Matic

Complications related to the T tube drainage of the common bile duct are not uncommon. Some, like dislocations of the T tube out of the common bile duct, could be very serious, particularly if developed during the first few days after surgery, when the abdominal drain in the subhepatic space had been already removed. Then, an emergency reoperation might be necessary. The slip of the T tube upwards or downwards inside the common bile duct is not so rare. Fortunately, it is less dangerous and can usually be resolved without reoperation. It takes place several days after surgery, followed by the right subcostal pain, occasionally with temperature, rise of the bilirubin and with decrease or complete cessation of the bile drainage through the T tube. The diagnosis can be made only on the basis of T tube cholangiography. The re-establishment of the proper T tube position must be done under X-ray visualization. Seven cases of the T tube slip within the common bile duct, its clinical presentation, diagnosis and method of repositioning were presented. Possible mechanism of complication was described. As far as we know, the complications have not been described by other authors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Wei Zhang ◽  
Ya-Jin Chen ◽  
Chang-Hao Wu ◽  
Wen-Da Li

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) had become one of the main options for management of choledocholithiasis. This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate on the feasibility and advantages of primary closure versus conventional T-tube drainage of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic choledochotomy. In this retrospective analysis, 100 patients (47 men and 53 women) with choledocholithiasis who underwent primary closure of the CBD (without T-tube drainage) after LCBDE (Group A) were compared with 92 patients who underwent LCBDE with T-tube drainage (Group B). Both groups were evaluated with regard to biliary complications, hospital stay, and recurrence of stones. The mean operation time was 104.12 minutes for Group A and 108.92 minutes for Group B ( P = 0.069). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A than that in Group B (6.95 days and 12.05 days, respectively; P < 0.001). In Group A, bile leakage occurred in two patients on postoperative Day 2 and Day 3, respectively. In Group B, bile leakage noted in one patient after removal of the T-tube on Day 14 after operation ( P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 40 months for both groups, stone recurrence was noted in two patients in Group A and three patients in Group B ( P = 0.672). Primary closure of the CBD is safe and feasible in selected patients after laparoscopic choledochotomy. It results in shorter duration of hospital stay without the need for carrying/care of a T-tube in the postoperative period and similar stone recurrence as that of the conventional method.


2012 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. e172-e178 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Daldoul ◽  
A. Moussi ◽  
A. Zaouche

1990 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Placer Galán ◽  
A. Colina Alonso

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 517-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shing-Moo Huang ◽  
Chung-Chin Yao ◽  
Ya-Wen Cheng ◽  
Ling-Yun Chen ◽  
Huichin Pan ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiographic drainage (PTCD) and laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with T-tube placement for the treatment of CBD stones. Between January 1991 and July 2002, 50 patients with choledocholithiasis and a CBD diameter larger than or equal to 1 cm underwent laparoscopic CBD explorations. The study group consisted of 10 patients undergoing laparoscopic primary closure of the CBD combined with PTCD. The control group consisted of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with T-tube placement. Parameters were compared statistically. The study group showed higher female/male ratio (6/4 vs 8/32, P = 0.02), less stone numbers (1.90 ± 0.88 vs 3.40 ± 1.65, P = 0.0078), shorter operation time (138 ± 37 minutes vs 191 ± 75 minutes, P = 0.014), and shorter postoperative stays (7 ± 3 days vs 10 ± 3 days, P = 0.0013). It seems that laparoscopic primary closure of the CBD combined with PTCD can shorten the operation time and postoperative stays as compared with laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with T-tube placement for the treatment of CBD stones.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinheng Liu ◽  
Yanting Wang ◽  
Xubao Liu ◽  
Sineng Yin

Abstract Background Traditionally, Surgical treatment strategies for elderly patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis include laparoscopic choledocholithotomy, cholecystectomy, and T-tube drainage. However, T-tube drainage in the biliary tract can still cause pain and other complications. This study was designed to compare the primary closure of choledochotomy and the use of T-tube after laparoscopic choledochotomy to determine whether primary suture can be as feasible and safe as suture with T-tube drainage in elderly patients. Methods From January 2017 to January 2018, 85 patients were selected to undergo laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: primary suture group (n=56) and T tube group (n=29). Preoperative data, intraoperative index, postoperative complications were recorded. Results There were no differences in preoperative data in both groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the postoperative total drainage volume on the first day and patients of residual stones were fewer, and all drainage tube extubation time was shorter in the primary suture group. And there were statistically significant differences in postoperative TBIL between the two groups. There were no pressure sores, hypostatic pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, serious complications of heart, lung and brain and even death in both groups. Conclusion Only if accurate preoperative risk assessment and strict treatment of basic diseases in elderly patients, intraoperative fine suture of the common bile duct, primary suture in elderly patients are feasible, safe, and valid after laparoscopic choledochotomy for verification of ductal clearance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document