Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones

Background T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs. Methods Between June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed. Results There was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence. Conclusions LCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.

Ultrasound guided tube drainage of perinephric abscess: Experience of 70 cases.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of ultrasound guided tube drainage of Perinephric abscess. Study Design: Observational study. Setting: Surgical Unit-II and Urology Ward Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College Teaching Hospital Sukkur & Mustafia Hospital Sukkur. Period: February 2016 to January 2020. Material & Methods: 70 cases with Perinephric abscess underwent ultrasound guided tube drainage. Diagnosis was established by history, clinical examination, investigations like ultrasound & CT scan. Patients with emphysematous kidney & chronic sinus formation and with small abscess were excluded from the study. Patients were followed up for 4 weeks for complete regression of abscess cavity on ultrasound. Results: Out of 70 Patients 61.4% were male and 35% were female. 58.5% of the patients had right sided Perinephric abscess. Majority of the patients(42.8%) belonged to age group 41-50 years. 31.4% of the patients were diabetic. Clinically 95.7% of the patients reported with fever and 88.5% with flank pain. Ultrasound guided tube drainage was successful in 65(92.8%) while in 5(7.1%) patients it failed and open drainage was performed. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided tube drainage is an effective way to treat Perinephric abscess with very few minor complications as compared to open drainage.

LAPROSCOPIC COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION: STENT DRAINAGE VERSUS T- TUBE DRAINAGE

Introduction: One of the safe & feasible methods for the management of extra-hepatic bile duct calculi is laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Around 10-15% of the subjects who have surgery due to gallstone disease have choledocholithiasis associated with it. A standard procedure to prevent bile escape from the choledochotomy site is conventionally postoperative T-tube drainage following common bile duct exploration. Aims & Objectives: Comparative study of laproscopic common bile duct exploration using stent drainage versus t- tube drainage. Material & Methods: The study involved a total of 46 subjects with choledocholithiasis, who were categoryed in 2 categorys. Category I as a drainage category of stents and Category 2 as a drainage category of T-tubes. The subjects in both classes underwent LCBDE surgery. Of the 46 subjects operated, 23 were in category I (stent drainage category) and 23 were in category 2 (T-tube drainage category). Results: 23 subjects were categoryed in the stent drainage and T-tube drainage categories, respectively. In both classes, no perioperative or postoperative mortality was reported. Subjects had hypertension in stent drainage category 4 (17.39 percent) and 5 (21.73 percent) suffered from diabetes as a comorbid disease, while 2 (8.69 percent) subjects had jaundice. Four (17.39 percent) subjects with diabetes and three (13.04 percent) subjects with jaundice were found in T-tube drainage category 3 (13.04 percent) with hypertension. In both classes, no statistically significant difference was found. In terms of organisational results and outcomes, statistically significant variations were found in both categorys (Table 3). Mean operating time was 103± 22.4 in category I while 127±32.7 (P value < 0.005) in category II. In the Stent Drainage Category, blood loss during procedure was 22±3.7 ml, while in the T-tube drainage category it was 38±5.1 (P value < 0.005). Conclusion. After laparoscopic choledochotomy, primary closure of the bile duct with spontaneously reversible biliary stent placement is a viable and practicable process. With spontaneously removable biliary stents, less surgery time, less bleeding and less intestinal complications have been observed. Keywords: stent drainage, T- tube drainage, choledochotomy

KNOWLEDGE OF STAFF NURSES REGARDING CARE OF PATIENT WITH CHEST TUBE DRAINAGE IN SELECTED HOSPITALS, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

Background of the study: Chest tube drainage which is also known as Under water seal drainage (UWSD), tube thoracotomy, or intercostal drainage, has a paramount importance in some emergencies or critical care situation. Inefcient nursing care or malfunction in chest tube drainage may associated with life threatening complications, or can be deadly for a patient in a matter of second. The aim of the study was to assess knowledge of staff Aim: nurses regarding care of patient with chest tube drainage. Method: Descriptive research design was adopted and 178 staff nurses working in ICU were selected by using non probability convenience sampling technique in selected hospitals, Kamrup (M), Assam and who fullls the inclusion criteria. It was found that majority 97(55%) of the Results: respondents had moderately adequate knowledge, 68(38%) respondents had inadequate knowledge, and 13(7%) had adequate knowledge. The mean and standard deviation of knowledge level is 15 and 4 respectively. The association was statistically tested by using Chi square at p≤0.001 level of signicance. The study shows that, out of 178 respondents, 68 (38%) had inadequate Conclusion: knowledge, 97 (55%) had moderately adequate knowledge and 13 (7%) had adequate knowledge regarding care of patient with chest tube drainage. So the investigator concluded that the in-service education in regular basis is very important for continuous learning.

Management of extra hepatic biliary obstruction, in a rural tertiary care hospital India

Background: Extra hepatic biliary obstruction (EHBO) is not a rare surgical problem; our experience in managing 36 patients over a period of two years at a tertiary care hospital in a rural setting in India. The objective was to study the etiology and clinical presentation of patients with EHBO, role of various investigative modalities and management strategies in these patients and their outcome.Methods: This was a prospective study conducted between September 2018 to August 2020 in the department of surgery in tertiary care center Subharti medical college (SMC) Meerut. Data was taken in a pre-formed performa and the results were tabulated and analyzed (descriptive analysis).Results: Out of 36 patients, 2 (5.5%) patients underwent choledochoduodenostomy, 1 (2.7%) exploratory laparotomy with CBD exploration with t tube drainage, 1 (2.7%) ERCP with pigtail drainage; 17(47.2%) ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) followed by cholecystectomy, 1 (2.7%) open cholecystectomy with t tube drainage, 4 (11.1%) ERCP alone, 2 (5.5%) hepaticojejunostomy, 1 (2.7%) ERCP followed by diverticulectomy, 2 (5.5%) PTBD (percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage) followed by a triple bypass surgery, 2 (5.5%) PTBD, 1 (2.7%) pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, 1 (2.7%) ERCP with sphincterotomy, 1 (2.7%) PTBD followed by whipples procedure. Patients were followed up and 5 (13.8%) patients had recurrence of the disease.Conclusions: EHBO is a hepatobiliary surgical condition caused by both neoplastic and non-neoplastic etiology. Benign pathologies common in younger patients whereas neoplastic conditions in older age. Ultrasonography is the most common investigative modality followed by ERCP with PTBD/ENBD playing an important role in decompression of biliary obstruction as a palliative measure in advanced malignancies.