t tube
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

896
(FIVE YEARS 125)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1628-1637
Author(s):  
Gabriele Spoletini ◽  
Giuseppe Bianco ◽  
Antonio Franco ◽  
Francesco Frongillo ◽  
Erida Nure ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 985-1001
Author(s):  
Taifeng Zhu ◽  
Haoming Lin ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Rui Zhang

Author(s):  
Tong Guo ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Peng Xie ◽  
Zhiwei Zhang ◽  
Xiaorui Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis. Methods From January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC + LCBDE + T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP + subsequent LC (ERCP + LC group, n = 275), LC + LCBDE + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) + primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, n = 479) and LC + laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, n = 280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results There was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP + LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP + LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16 ± 3.88 days vs 6.92 ± 1.71 days vs 10.74 ± 5.30 days, P < 0.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08 ± 42.79 min vs 92.31 ± 10.26 min, 99.09 ± 8.46 min, P < 0.05). Compared to ERCP + LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP + LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72 months. Four patients in ERCP + LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones. Conclusion All the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP + LC. LC + LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC + LCBDE + T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.


Author(s):  
Yanjun Wang ◽  
Youbao Huang ◽  
Chunfeng Shi ◽  
Linpei Wang ◽  
Shengwei Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients with acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones (CBDSs). The outcomes after LCBDE with primary closure in patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis are unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCBDE with primary closure for the management of acute cholangitis caused by CBDSs. Methods Between June 2015 and June 2020, 368 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 193 patients with CBDS-related acute cholangitis underwent LC + LCBDE with primary closure of the CBD (PC group) and 62 patients underwent LC + LCBDE followed by T-tube placement (T-tube group). A total of 113 patients who did not have cholangitis were excluded. The clinical data were compared and analyzed. Results There was no mortality in either group. No significant differences were noted in morbidity, bile leakage rate, retained CBD stones, or readmission rate within 30 days between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the PC group avoided T-tube-related complications and had a shorter operative time (121.12 min vs. 143.37 min) and length of postoperative hospital stay (6.59 days vs. 8.81 days). Moreover, the hospital expenses in the PC group were significantly lower than those in the T-tube group ($4844.47 vs. $5717.22). No biliary stricture occurred during a median follow-up of 18 months in any patient. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in the rate of stone recurrence. Conclusions LCBDE with primary closure is a safe and effective treatment for cholangitis caused by CBDSs. LCBDE with primary closure is not inferior to T-tube drainage for the management of CBDS-related acute cholangitis in suitable patients.


Author(s):  
Gulshan Kumar

Introduction: One of the safe & feasible methods for the management of extra-hepatic bile duct calculi is laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Around 10-15% of the subjects who have surgery due to gallstone disease have choledocholithiasis associated with it. A standard procedure to prevent bile escape from the choledochotomy site is conventionally postoperative T-tube drainage following common bile duct exploration.  Aims & Objectives: Comparative study of laproscopic common bile duct exploration using stent drainage versus t- tube drainage. Material & Methods: The study involved a total of 46 subjects with choledocholithiasis, who were categoryed in 2 categorys. Category I as a drainage category of stents and Category 2 as a drainage category of T-tubes. The subjects in both classes underwent LCBDE surgery. Of the 46 subjects operated, 23 were in category I (stent drainage category) and 23 were in category 2 (T-tube drainage category).  Results:  23 subjects were categoryed in the stent drainage and T-tube drainage categories, respectively. In both classes, no perioperative or postoperative mortality was reported. Subjects had hypertension in stent drainage category 4 (17.39 percent) and 5 (21.73 percent) suffered from diabetes as a comorbid disease, while 2 (8.69 percent) subjects had jaundice. Four (17.39 percent) subjects with diabetes and three (13.04 percent) subjects with jaundice were found in T-tube drainage category 3 (13.04 percent) with hypertension. In both classes, no statistically significant difference was found. In terms of organisational results and outcomes, statistically significant variations were found in both categorys (Table 3). Mean operating time was 103± 22.4 in category I while 127±32.7 (P value < 0.005) in category II. In the Stent Drainage Category, blood loss during procedure was 22±3.7 ml, while in the T-tube drainage category it was 38±5.1 (P value < 0.005). Conclusion. After laparoscopic choledochotomy, primary closure of the bile duct with spontaneously reversible biliary stent placement is a viable and practicable process. With spontaneously removable biliary stents, less surgery time, less bleeding and less intestinal complications have been observed. Keywords: stent drainage, T- tube drainage, choledochotomy


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-167
Author(s):  
Syed Hussain ◽  
Asrar Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Mughal ◽  
Irum Saleem ◽  
Saqib Islam

Objective:To assess the presentation and surgical management of Mirrizi syndrome patients who underwent LaparoscopicCholecystectomy. Study Design and Setting:Retrospective Descriptive Study was conducted at Surgical Department Combined MilitaryHospital Rawalpindi and Combined Military Hospital Quetta from 1st Jan 2010 to 20th Jan 2016. Methodology:Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy during this period were retrospectively reviewed. Allcases of Mirizzi Syndrome (MS) were identified and data analysed. Results:A total of 5500 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during this period. Approximately 26(0.47%)cases were identified to be having MS. Out of these 26 cases only 8 (30%) were males while 18 (70%) were females. Ageranged from 25 to 80 years. Three patients (11%) had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) done.Type-I MS was found in 19 cases (73 %), Type-II in 3 cases (11%), Type-III and Type-IV in 2 cases each (7.69 %).Conversion to open surgery was carried out in 15 cases (57.6 %). All type-I MS had cholecystectomy except one casewhere partial cholecystectomy was done. T-tube closure of common bile duct was done in all Type-II MS. Similarly T-tube closure was possible in two cases of type-III while one hadRoux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. All cases of type-IV MS had Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. One patient out of 26 (3.8 %) had carcinoma gallbladder. There was no mortality. Conclusion:Type-I MS can be managed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in selected patients.Type-II and type-III MS may need placement of T-tube while most of type-IV MS are managed with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Yun Hsueh ◽  
En-Kuei Tang

Abstract Background: iatrogenic cervical esophageal transection after thyroidectomy is an extremely rare condition that requires prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention.Case presentation: we reported a rare case of iatrogenic cervical esophageal transection following thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma in a 54-year-old woman. Primary repair was not achievable because of loss of a long segment of the cervical esophagus. A modified diversion was performed by inserting a T-tube into the remnant esophagus, followed by gastrostomy and jejunostomy. The next day, mediastinal abscess was detected on chest computed tomography; therefore, thoracoscopic mediastinotomy was performed, with placement of two drains. After 6 months, thoracoscopic esophagectomy, alimentary reconstruction with gastric pull-up, and cervical esophagogastrostomy anastomosis were performed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 18, without complications.Conclusions: iatrogenic cervical esophageal transection following thyroidectomy is a rare but fatal complication. It can be successfully managed with a series of treatments, including modified diversion procedure, prompt drainage of mediastinitis, alimentary reconstruction with gastric pull-up, and cervical esophagogastrostomy anastomosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-386
Author(s):  
Niccolò Incarbone ◽  
Riccardo De Carlis ◽  
Leonardo Centonze ◽  
Livia Palmieri ◽  
Giuseppe Cordaro ◽  
...  

Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of >9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p < 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document