How does cyanoacrylate glue compare with band ligation for treating acute bleeding gastric varices in people with portal hypertension?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurinchi Gurusamy
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-176
Author(s):  
Md Ismail Patwary ◽  
Matiur Rahman ◽  
Kaushik Mojumder

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a heterogeneous group of liver disorders of vascular origin, leading to portal hypertension (PHTN) in the absence of cirrhosis.The lesions are generallyvascular, either in the portal vein, its branches or in the peri-sinusoidal area. The majority of diseases included in the category of NCPH are well-characterized disease entities where PHTN is a late manifestation. Two diseases that present only with features of PHTN and are common in developing countries are non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). Non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis is a syndrome of obscure etiology, characterized by ‘obliterative-portovenopathy’ leading to PHT, massive splenomegaly and well-tolerated episodes of variceal bleeding in young adults from low socioeconomic backgrounds, having near normal hepatic functions. In some parts of the world, NCPFis called idiopathic portal hypertension in Japan or ‘hepatoportalsclerosis’in USA. Because 85–95% of patient with NCPF and EHPVO present with variceal bleeding, treatment involves management with endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) or variceal ligation (EVL). These therapies are effective in approximately 90–95% of patients. Gastric varices are another common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in these patients and these can be managed with cyanoacrylate glue injection or surgery. The prognosis of patients with NCPF is good and 5 years survival in patients in whom variceal bleeding can be controlled has been reported to be approximately 95–100%.Bangladesh Med J. 2014 Sep; 43 (3): 170-176


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salahuddin Mahmud ◽  
Syed Shafi Ahmed ◽  
Jahida Gulshan ◽  
Farhana Tasneem ◽  
Madhabi Baidya

Background: Variceal bleeding is often a life threatening clinical situation in infants and children. Band ligation is the main endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices.Objective: To see the outcome of band ligation of esophageal varices in extra-hepatic and hepatic cases of portal hypertension.Methods: This prospective study was done in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh on 40 consecutive cases of esophageal varices enrolled from April, 2014 to March 2016. Every case was treated with band ligation followed by tab. propranolol. Cases were followed up for a minimum period of one year after the band ligation.Results: Age of the children was 2-12 years with mean age of 7.2±4.3 years and male:female ratio was 1.5:1. Out of 40 children, 32 (80%) were pre-hepatic and 8 (20%) hepatic (chronic liver disease with portal hypertension) causes. Only 1 session required in 50% pre-hepatic cases and multiple (2-3) sessions required in hepatic (100%) cases. Almost same number of band (average 2-3) required in every session of both cases. Grade-II esophageal varices with red sign were more common in prehepatic cases & severity of grading much more (grade-III & IV) in hepatic cases. Gastric varices were more common in hepatic (50%) cases than extra-hepatic (12.5%) cases. Recurrence of bleeding occurred in all hepatic (100%) cases and half (50%) of the pre-hepatic cases. Early re-bleeding was more common in hepatic (75%) cases & late re-bleeding in both pre-hepatic (43.7%) & hepatic (100%) cases. Minimal side effect like discomfort (10%) & Nausea (10%) were present after the procedure.Conclusion: Pre-hepatic was the most common etiology of portal hypertension in studied children. Fewer sessions were required in pre-hepatic cases than in hepatic cases. Severity of grading, re-bleeding & associated gastric varices were more common in hepatic cases. Band ligation was found to be the treatment of choice for the control of acute variceal bleeding and prevention of re-bleeding with less complications.Bangladesh J Child Health 2017; VOL 41 (1) :28-33


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin Biecker

Gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Most patients bleed from esophageal or gastric varices, but bleeding from ectopic varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy is also possible. The management of acute bleeding has changed over the last years. Patients are managed with a combination of endoscopic and pharmacologic treatment. The endoscopic treatment of choice for esophageal variceal bleeding is variceal band ligation. Bleeding from gastric varices is treated by injection with cyanoacrylate. Treatment with vasoactive drugs as well as antibiotic treatment is started before or at the time point of endoscopy. The first-line treatment for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding is nonselective beta blockers. Pharmacologic therapy is recommended for most patients; band ligation is an alternative in patients with contraindications for or intolerability of beta blockers. Treatment options for secondary prophylaxis include variceal band ligation, beta blockers, a combination of nitrates and beta blockers, and combination of band ligation and pharmacologic treatment. A clear superiority of one treatment over the other has not been shown. Bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy or ectopic varices is less common. Treatment options include beta blocker therapy, injection therapy, and interventional radiology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 2133-2137
Author(s):  
Dariia I. Voroniak ◽  
Oleg S. Godik ◽  
Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk ◽  
Olena М. Shapoval ◽  
Viktoriia V. Piliponova

The aim: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) after the first esophageal EVL session in children with PH according to endoscopic data. Materials and methods: EVL was performed to 39 patients with PH for the purpose of variceal bleeding primary and secondary prophylaxis. Results: Esophageal varices grade decrease was observed in 22 (56.41%) children. Cases of early rebleeding (within 14 days after EVL) were not registered. Eradication of varices was successful in 11 (28.2%) of patients. In 1 (2.56%) case the complication (bleeding) occurred while banding procedure. 1 (2.56%) patients had bleeding from gastric varices prior to a control endoscopy. Portal gastropathy grade changes were observed in 17 (43.59%) patients. Conclusions: EVL is a safe and effective method of esophageal varices bleeding prophylaxis. This method allows control the esophageal varices grade at different phases of PH treatment in children. Even one EVL session can decrease the grade of esophageal varices (р<0.001). The EVL effect on the severity of portal gastropathy (p=0.02) and on the red marks presence (p=0.005) was also determined. EVL reduced the risk of variceal rebleeding (р=0.05, RR=0.05 (95%CI 0.01-0.32)).


Author(s):  
Pushpinder S. Khera ◽  
Pawan K. Garg ◽  
Sarbesh Tiwari ◽  
Narendra Bhargava ◽  
Taruna Yadav ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Retrograde transvenous obliteration (RTO) with the assistance of a balloon (BRTO) or a vascular plug (PARTO) is an established method for treating gastric varices (GVs) secondary to portal hypertension. Most of the available studies on RTO have used lipiodol along with sclerosing agents like ethanolamine oleate or sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of RTO for treating GVs using STS as a sclerosant without lipiodol. Materials and Methods Sixteen patients (nine men, age range 16–74 years) were included in this retrospective study. Twelve patients presented with acute bleeding, two with chronic bleeding, one with large varices without bleeding, and one with refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE). BRTO was attempted in 14 patients and PARTO in 2 patients. The technical and clinical success and complications of RTO were studied. Results The RTO procedure was technically successful in 14 (14/16, 87.5%) patients, with 13 (13/14, 93%) obtaining clinical success. One patient died due to the early recurrence of bleeding. Three patients had minor intraprocedural complications. Conclusion Retrograde gastric variceal obliteration using STS is safe and technically feasible with high technical and clinical success and low complication rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document