scholarly journals Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: current concepts and modern management

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-176
Author(s):  
Md Ismail Patwary ◽  
Matiur Rahman ◽  
Kaushik Mojumder

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a heterogeneous group of liver disorders of vascular origin, leading to portal hypertension (PHTN) in the absence of cirrhosis.The lesions are generallyvascular, either in the portal vein, its branches or in the peri-sinusoidal area. The majority of diseases included in the category of NCPH are well-characterized disease entities where PHTN is a late manifestation. Two diseases that present only with features of PHTN and are common in developing countries are non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). Non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis is a syndrome of obscure etiology, characterized by ‘obliterative-portovenopathy’ leading to PHT, massive splenomegaly and well-tolerated episodes of variceal bleeding in young adults from low socioeconomic backgrounds, having near normal hepatic functions. In some parts of the world, NCPFis called idiopathic portal hypertension in Japan or ‘hepatoportalsclerosis’in USA. Because 85–95% of patient with NCPF and EHPVO present with variceal bleeding, treatment involves management with endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) or variceal ligation (EVL). These therapies are effective in approximately 90–95% of patients. Gastric varices are another common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in these patients and these can be managed with cyanoacrylate glue injection or surgery. The prognosis of patients with NCPF is good and 5 years survival in patients in whom variceal bleeding can be controlled has been reported to be approximately 95–100%.Bangladesh Med J. 2014 Sep; 43 (3): 170-176

1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Orozco ◽  
Takeshi Takahashi ◽  
Miguel A. Mercado ◽  
Eduardo Prado-Orozco ◽  
Hector Ferral ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
SMB Hussain ◽  
MR Hossain ◽  
MM Rahman ◽  
S Parvin ◽  
MD Hossain

Introduction: Rupture Gastric varices (GVs) can lead to catastrophic gastrointestinal bleeding, though it is much less in number than that of rupture oesophageal varices (OVs). Successful haemostasis of such bleeding is difficult specially in the back ground of non availability of appropriate drugs and instruments. Case Report: Introduction of intra-variceal injection of cyanoacrylate glue since 1980s has changed the scenario, it is cheaper and effective in controlling GVs related bleeding. A case of successful control of gastric variceal bleeding is reported. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v7i2.10397 JAFMC 2011; 7(2): 44-46


Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Alwarraky ◽  
Hasan A. Elzohary ◽  
Mohamed A. Melegy ◽  
Anwar Mohamed

Abstract Background Our purpose is to compare the stent patency and clinical outcome of trans-jugular intra-hepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) through the left branch portal vein (TIPS-LPV) to the standard TIPS through the right branch (TIPS-RPV). We retrospectively reviewed all patients (n = 54) with refractory portal hypertension who were subjected to TIPS-LPV at our institute (TIPS-LPV) between 2016 and 2018. These patients were matched with 56 control patients treated with the standard TIPS-RPV (TIPS-RPV). The 2 groups were compared regarding the stent patency rate, encephalopathy, and re-interventions for 1 year after the procedure. Results TIPS-LPV group showed 12 months higher patency rate (90.7% compared to 73.2%) (P < 0.005). The number of the encephalopathy attacks in the TIPS-LPV group was significantly lower than that of the TIPS-RPV group at 6 and 12 months of follow-up [P = 0.012 and 0.036, respectively]. Re-bleeding and improvement of ascites were the same in the two groups [P > 0.05]. Patients underwent TIPS-LPV needed less re-interventions and required less hospitalizations than those with TIPS-RPV [P = 0.039 and P = 0.03, respectively]. Conclusion The new TIPS approach is to extend the stent to LPV. This new TIPS-LPV approach showed the same clinical efficiency as the standard TIPS-RPV in treating variceal bleeding and ascites. However, it proved a better stent patency with lower rates of re-interventions, encephalopathy, and hospital admissions than TIPS through the right branch.


Author(s):  
Hany El-Assaly ◽  
Lamiaa I. A. Metwally ◽  
Heba Azzam ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Seif-Elnasr

Abstract Background Portal hypertension is a major complication resulting from obstruction of portal blood flow, like cirrhosis or portal vein thrombosis, that leads to portal hypertension. MDCT angiography has become an important tool for investigation of the liver as well as potentially challenging varices by detailing the course of these tortuous vessels. This information is decisive for liver transplantation as well as for common procedures in which an unexpected varix can cause significant bleeding. Results This study included an assessment of 60 cases of portal hypertension (28 males and 32 females), their age ranged from 42 to 69 years (mean age = 57.2 ± 6.63). All patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension, underwent upper GI endoscopy followed by a triphasic CT scan with CT angiographic assessment for the screening of gastro-esophageal varices. CT is highly sensitive as compared to upper GI endoscopy (sensitivity 93%) in detecting esophageal varices. Gastric varices detected by CT in 22 patients (37%) compared to 14 patients (23%) detected by endoscopy. While paraesophageal varices were detected in 63% of patients and retro-gastric varices in 80% of patients that were not visualized by endoscopy. Our study reported that the commonest type of collaterals were the splenic collaterals, and we also found there is a significant correlation between the portal vein diameter and the number of collaterals as well as between the portal vein diameter and splenic vein diameter. Conclusions Multi-slice CT serves as an important non-invasive imaging modality in the diagnosis of collaterals in cases of portal hypertension. CT portography can replace endoscopy in the detection of high-risk varices. It also proved that there is a correlation between portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and number of collaterals.


1985 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1034-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunihiko Ohnishi ◽  
Masayuki Saito ◽  
Hidetaka Terabayashi ◽  
Fumio Nomura ◽  
Kunio Okuda

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyriac Abby Philips ◽  
Rizwan Ahamed ◽  
Sasidharan Rajesh ◽  
Tom George ◽  
Meera Mohanan ◽  
...  

Abstract Gastric varices are encountered less frequently than esophageal varices. Nonetheless, gastric variceal bleeding is more severe and associated with worse outcomes. Conventionally, gastric varices have been described based on the location and extent and endoscopic treatments offered based on these descriptions. With improved understanding of portal hypertension and the dynamic physiology of collateral circulation, gastric variceal classification has been refined to include inflow and outflow based hemodynamic pathways. These have led to an improvement in the management of gastric variceal disease through newer modalities of treatment such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided glue-coiling combination therapy and the emergence of highly effective endovascular treatments such as shunt and variceal complex embolization with or without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients who are deemed ‘difficult’ to manage the traditional way. Furthermore, the decisions regarding TIPS and additional endovascular procedures in patients with gastric variceal bleeding have changed after the emergence of ‘portal hypertension theories’ of proximity, throughput, and recruitment. The hemodynamic classification, grounded on novel theories and its cognizance, can help in identifying patients at baseline, in whom conventional treatment could fail. In this exhaustive review, we discuss the conventional and hemodynamic diagnosis of gastric varices concerning new classifications; explore and illustrate new ‘portal hypertension theories’ of gastric variceal disease and corresponding management and shed light on current evidence-based treatments through a ‘new’ algorithmic approach, established on hemodynamic physiology of gastric varices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanning Yin ◽  
Haipeng Liu ◽  
Youcheng Zhang ◽  
Wen Rong

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of surgical procedures (selective or nonselective shunt, devascularization, and combined shunt and devascularization) in preventing recurrent variceal bleeding and other complications in patients with portal hypertension. Methods. A systematic literature search of the Medline and Cochrane Library databases was carried out, and a meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Quality of Reporting Meta-Analyses (QUOROM) statement. Results. There were a significantly higher reduction in rebleeding, yet a significantly more common encephalopathy () in patients who underwent the shunt procedure compared with patients who had only a devascularization procedure. Further, there were no significant differences in rebleeding, late mortality, and encephalopathy between selective versus non-selective shunt. Next, the decrease of portal vein pressure, portal vein diameter, and free portal pressure in patients who underwent combined treatment with shunt and devascularization was more pronounced compared with patients who were treated with devascularization alone (). Conclusions. This meta-analysis shows clinical advantages of combined shunt and devascularization over devascularization in the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding and other complications in patients with portal hypertension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document