End‐to‐end quantitative analysis modeling of near‐infrared spectroscopy based on convolutional neural network

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. e3122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan‐Yuan Chen ◽  
Zhi‐Bin Wang
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (40) ◽  
pp. 5118-5125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyi Chen ◽  
Qinqin Chai ◽  
Ni Lin ◽  
Xianghui Li ◽  
Wu Wang

An end-to-end 1D-CNN based on the NIRS technique is proposed to non-destructively and effectively discriminate aristolochic acids and their analogues.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Xueying Li ◽  
Pingping Fan ◽  
Zongmin Li ◽  
Guangyuan Chen ◽  
Huimin Qiu ◽  
...  

Changes in land cover will cause the changes in the climate and environmental characteristics, which has an important influence on the social economy and ecosystem. The main form of land cover is different types of soil. Compared with traditional methods, visible and near-infrared spectroscopy technology can classify different types of soil rapidly, effectively, and nondestructively. Based on the visible near-infrared spectroscopy technology, this paper takes the soil of six different land cover types in Qingdao, China orchards, woodlands, tea plantations, farmlands, bare lands, and grasslands as examples and establishes a convolutional neural network classification model. The classification results of different number of training samples are analyzed and compared with the support vector machine algorithm. Under the condition that Kennard–Stone algorithm divides the calibration set, the classification results of six different soil types and single six soil types by convolutional neural network are better than those by the support vector machine. Under the condition of randomly dividing the calibration set according to the proportion of 1/3 and 1/4, the classification results by convolutional neural network are also better. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of land cover classification with small samples by convolutional neural network and, according to the deep learning algorithm, to explore new methods for rapid, nondestructive, and accurate classification of the land cover.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunqiang Qing ◽  
Ruisen Huang ◽  
Keum-Shik Hong

This study decodes consumers' preference levels using a convolutional neural network (CNN) in neuromarketing. The classification accuracy in neuromarketing is a critical factor in evaluating the intentions of the consumers. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is utilized as a neuroimaging modality to measure the cerebral hemodynamic responses. In this study, a specific decoding structure, called CNN-based fNIRS-data analysis, was designed to achieve a high classification accuracy. Compared to other methods, the automated characteristics, constant training of the dataset, and learning efficiency of the proposed method are the main advantages. The experimental procedure required eight healthy participants (four female and four male) to view commercial advertisement videos of different durations (15, 30, and 60 s). The cerebral hemodynamic responses of the participants were measured. To compare the preference classification performances, CNN was utilized to extract the most common features, including the mean, peak, variance, kurtosis, and skewness. Considering three video durations, the average classification accuracies of 15, 30, and 60 s videos were 84.3, 87.9, and 86.4%, respectively. Among them, the classification accuracy of 87.9% for 30 s videos was the highest. The average classification accuracies of three preferences in females and males were 86.2 and 86.3%, respectively, showing no difference in each group. By comparing the classification performances in three different combinations (like vs. so-so, like vs. dislike, and so-so vs. dislike) between two groups, male participants were observed to have targeted preferences for commercial advertising, and the classification performance 88.4% between “like” vs. “dislike” out of three categories was the highest. Finally, pairwise classification performance are shown as follows: For female, 86.1% (like vs. so-so), 87.4% (like vs. dislike), 85.2% (so-so vs. dislike), and for male 85.7, 88.4, 85.1%, respectively.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-463
Author(s):  
逯家辉 Lu Jiahui ◽  
王迪 Wang Di ◽  
沈畏 Shen Wei ◽  
郭伟良 Guo Weiliang ◽  
张益波 Zhang Yibo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document