SLIP MODEL OF THE 2001 KUNLUN MOUNTAIN M S 8.1 EARTHQUAKE BY SDM: JOINT INVERSION FROM GPS AND INSAR DATA

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-413
Author(s):  
TU Hong-Wei ◽  
WANG Rong-Jiang ◽  
DIAO Fa-Qi ◽  
ZHANG Yong ◽  
WAN Yong-Ge ◽  
...  
Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. WB165-WB176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Chichinina ◽  
Irina Obolentseva ◽  
Leonid Gik ◽  
Boris Bobrov ◽  
Gerardo Ronquillo-Jarillo

This study attempts to validate a mathematical formalism of introducing attenuation into Schoenberg’s linear slip model. This formalism is based on replacing the real-valued weaknesses by complex-valued ones. During an ultrasonic experiment, performed at a central frequency of [Formula: see text] on a plate-stack model with [Formula: see text]-thick Plexiglas™ plates, the velocity and attenuation (inverse of the quality factor [Formula: see text]) of P-, SH-, and SV-waves are measured in directions from 25° to 90° with the symmetry axis for dry and oil-saturated models and loading uniaxial pressures of 2 and [Formula: see text]. The velocity and attenuation data are fitted by the derived theoretical functions. The values of the real and imaginary parts of the complex-valued weaknesses are estimated. Thereal parts of the weaknesses, which have a clear physical meaning (they affect the weakening of the material), are three times larger for the dry model than for the oil-saturated one. The imaginary parts of the weaknesses are responsible for attenuation; their values are an order of magnitude smaller than the real parts. The derived expressions for angle-dependent velocities and attenuations can be used to distinguish between dry and oil-saturated fractures. In particular, the P-wave attenuation function in the symmetry-axis direction (normal to fracture planes) is different in dry and saturated media. The experiment shows that the plate-stack model is inhomogeneous because of the nonuniform pressure distribution, which degrades the experimental results and creates difficulties in the inversion for the complex-valued weaknesses — particularly in joint inversion of P- and S-wave data.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (15) ◽  
pp. 7973-7981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Chousianitis ◽  
A. Ozgun Konca ◽  
G.-Akis Tselentis ◽  
Gerassimos A. Papadopoulos ◽  
Michail Gianniou

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 1639-1655
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Corinna Roy ◽  
Andrew Curtis ◽  
Andy Nowacki ◽  
Brian Baptie

SUMMARY Seismic body wave traveltime tomography and surface wave dispersion tomography have been used widely to characterize earthquakes and to study the subsurface structure of the Earth. Since these types of problem are often significantly non-linear and have non-unique solutions, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods have been used to find probabilistic solutions. Body and surface wave data are usually inverted separately to produce independent velocity models. However, body wave tomography is generally sensitive to structure around the subvolume in which earthquakes occur and produces limited resolution in the shallower Earth, whereas surface wave tomography is often sensitive to shallower structure. To better estimate subsurface properties, we therefore jointly invert for the seismic velocity structure and earthquake locations using body and surface wave data simultaneously. We apply the new joint inversion method to a mining site in the United Kingdom at which induced seismicity occurred and was recorded on a small local network of stations, and where ambient noise recordings are available from the same stations. The ambient noise is processed to obtain inter-receiver surface wave dispersion measurements which are inverted jointly with body wave arrival times from local earthquakes. The results show that by using both types of data, the earthquake source parameters and the velocity structure can be better constrained than in independent inversions. To further understand and interpret the results, we conduct synthetic tests to compare the results from body wave inversion and joint inversion. The results show that trade-offs between source parameters and velocities appear to bias results if only body wave data are used, but this issue is largely resolved by using the joint inversion method. Thus the use of ambient seismic noise and our fully non-linear inversion provides a valuable, improved method to image the subsurface velocity and seismicity.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khan Z. Jadoon ◽  
Davood Moghadas ◽  
Aurangzeb Jadoon ◽  
Samir K. Al-Mashharawi ◽  
Thomas M. Missimer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document