scholarly journals Measurement error modeling and nutritional epidemiology association analyses

2011 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a
Author(s):  
Ross L. Prentice ◽  
Ying Huang
2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (479) ◽  
pp. 856-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent A Johnson ◽  
Amy H Herring ◽  
Joseph G Ibrahim ◽  
Anna Maria Siega-Riz

Biometrics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond J. Carroll ◽  
Douglas Midthune ◽  
Laurence S. Freedman ◽  
Victor Kipnis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Willis

AbstractUnderstanding the drivers of microbial diversity is a fundamental question in microbial ecology. Extensive literature discusses different methods for describing microbial diversity and documenting its effects on ecosystem function. However, it is widely believed that diversity depends on the number of reads that are sequenced. I discuss a statistical perspective on diversity, framing the diversity of an environment as an unknown parameter, and discussing the bias and variance of plug-in and rarefied estimates. I argue that by failing to account for both bias and variance, we invalidate analysis of alpha diversity. I describe the state of the statistical literature for addressing these problems, and suggest that measurement error modeling can address issues with variance, but bias corrections need to be utilized as well. I encourage microbial ecologists to avoid motivating their investigations with alpha diversity analyses that do not use valid statistical methodology.


Author(s):  
Yu Jiang ◽  
Hongmei Zhang ◽  
Shan V Andrews ◽  
Hasan Arshad ◽  
Susan Ewart ◽  
...  

Abstract Motivation Eosinophils are phagocytic white blood cells with a variety of roles in the immune system. In situations where actual counts are not available, high quality approximations of their cell proportions using indirect markers are critical. Results We develop a Bayesian measurement error model to estimate proportions of eosinophils in cord blood, using the cord blood DNA methylation profiles, based on markers of eosinophil cell heterogeneity in blood of adults. The proposed method can be directly extended to other cells across different reference panels. We demonstrate the method’s estimation accuracy using B cells and show that the findings support the proposed approach. The method has been incorporated into the estimateCellCounts function in the minfi package to estimate eosinophil cells proportions in cord blood. Availability estimateCellCounts function is implemented and available in Bioconductor package minfi. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2010 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
María P. Casanova ◽  
Pilar Iglesias ◽  
Heleno Bolfarine ◽  
Victor H. Salinas ◽  
Alexis Peña

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (6a) ◽  
pp. 821-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila A Bingham

AbstractObjective:To illustrate biomarkers of diet that can be used to validate estimates of dietary intake in the study of gene–environment interactions in complex diseases.Design:Prospective cohort studies, studies of biomarkers where diet is carefully controlled.Setting:Free–living individuals, volunteers in metabolic suites.Subjects:Male and female human volunteers.Results:Recent studies using biomarkers have demonstrated substantial differences in the extent of measurement error from those derived by comparison with other methods of dietary assessment. The interaction between nutritional and genetic factors has so far largely gone uninvestigated, but can be studied in epidemiological trials that include collections of biological material. Large sample sizes are required to study interactions, and these are made larger in the presence of measurement errors.Conclusions:Diet is of key importance in affecting the risk of most chronic diseases in man. Nutritional epidemiology provides the only direct approach to the quantification of risks. The introduction of biomarkers to calibrate the measurement error in dietary reports, and as additional measures of exposure, is a significant development in the effort to improve estimates of the magnitude of the contribution of diet in affecting individual disease risk within populations. The extent of measurement error has important implications for correction for regression dilution and for sample size. The collection of biological samples to improve and validate estimates of exposure, enhance the pursuit of scientific hypotheses, and enable gene–nutrient interactions to be studied, should become the routine in nutritional epidemiology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document