Impact of using DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing binge eating disorder in bariatric surgery candidates: Change in prevalence rate, demographic characteristics, and scores on the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory - 2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF)

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Marek ◽  
Yossef S. Ben-Porath ◽  
Kathleen Ashton ◽  
Leslie J. Heinberg
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piergiuseppe Vinai ◽  
Annalisa Da Ros ◽  
Maurizio Speciale ◽  
Nicola Gentile ◽  
Anna Tagliabue ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Borgès Da Silva ◽  
Roxane Borgès Da Silva ◽  
Alexandre Prud'homme ◽  
Pierre Campan ◽  
Jean Michel Azorin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz H TESS ◽  
Letícia MAXIMIANO-FERREIRA ◽  
Denis PAJECKI ◽  
Yuan-Pang WANG

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Eating pathologies among bariatric surgery candidates are common and associated with adverse surgical outcomes, including weight regain and low quality of life. However, their assessment is made difficult by the great variety and inconsistent use of standardized measures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) in presurgical patients and to make a critical appraisal of assessment tools for BED. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1994 to March 2017. Data were extracted, tabulated and summarized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: A total of 21 observational studies were reviewed for data extraction and analysis. Prevalence of BED in bariatric populations ranged from 2% to 53%. Considerable variation in patient characteristics and in BED assessment measures was evident among the studies. In addition, several methodological weaknesses were recognized in most of the studies. Ten different psychometric instruments were used to assess BED. Clinical interviews were used in only 12 studies, though this is the preferred tool to diagnose BED. CONCLUSION: Study heterogeneity accounted for the variability of the results from different centers and methodological flaws such as insufficient sample size and selection bias impaired the evidence on the magnitude of BED in surgical settings. For the sake of comparability and generalizability of the findings in future studies, researchers must recruit representative samples of treatment-seeking candidates for bariatric surgery and systematically apply standard instruments for the assessment of BED.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Ziegler ◽  
J. Mathieu ◽  
P. Böhme ◽  
P. Witkowski

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaShanda R. Jones-Corneille ◽  
Thomas A. Wadden ◽  
David B. Sarwer ◽  
Lucy F. Faulconbridge ◽  
Anthony N. Fabricatore ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Kaur ◽  
An Binh Dang ◽  
Jasmine Gan ◽  
Zhen An ◽  
Isabel Krug

Night eating syndrome (NES) is currently classified as an Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) under the Diagnostic Statistical Manual−5 (DSM-5). This systematic review aims to consolidate the studies that describe the sociodemographic, clinical and psychological features of NES in a population of patients with eating disorders (ED), obesity, or those undergoing bariatric surgery, and were published after the publication of the DSM-5. A further aim was to compare, where possible, NES with BED on the aforementioned variables. Lastly, we aimed to appraise the quality of the studies being included in the review. We conducted a systematic search on three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase) which resulted in the selection of 22 studies for the review. We included the articles that studied patients with NES and their sociodemographic, clinical and psychological features in a clinical (i.e., ED, obese or bariatric surgery) population, through a quantitative study design. Articles were excluded if the NES patients included in the study had a comorbid psychological disorder, and/or the sample was collected from a university/non-clinical population, and/or the study design was qualitative, and/or NES features were compared with any other disorder, except BED. Our study found that no conclusions about the link between any sociodemographic feature (such as, age, gender, income, etc.) and an NES diagnosis could be made. Further, NES patients presented with elevated ED pathology (including emotional eating and loss of control eating) and higher occurrence of depressive symptoms than controls. Contrary to the literature suggesting that NES and Binge Eating Disorder (BED; an ED subtype which is also comorbid with obesity) patients often report overlapping features, questioning the validity of NES as an ED diagnosis, we found that BED can be differentiated from NES by the higher occurrence of emotional eating, body related concerns and abnormal eating episodes. The review also suggested an overlap between NES and Sleep-Related Eating Disorder. We recommend that it is essential to study NES as an independent disorder to further develop its diagnostic criteria and treatment options, thereby, increasing the quality of life of the patients suffering from this syndrome.


Open Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Cella ◽  
Landino Fei ◽  
Rosa D’Amico ◽  
Cristiano Giardiello ◽  
Alfredo Allaria ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe present study sought to: 1) assess the prevalence of Binge Eating Disorder (BED) and abnormal eating behaviors in bariatric surgery candidates; 2) compare patients with and without BED as regards to eating disturbances, psychological characteristics, and health status; 3) individuate which factors were significantly related to binge eating severity.MethodsSixty-three preoperative patients (17 males and 46 females) were screened by means of an ad hoc socio-demographic schedule, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Eating Disorders Inventory-3, the Binge Eating Scale, and the General Health Questionnaire-28. BED diagnosis was performed through a clinical interview.ResultsBED and disordered eating, such as episodes of binge eating, sense of lack of control over eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors, appear common in patients undergoing weight loss surgery. Significant differences between BED and non-BED subjects in relation to eating disturbances and psychological characteristics emerged. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only emotional dys-regulation significantly predicted binge eating vulnerability.ConclusionThe recognition of factors involved in the development and maintenance of disordered eating in bariatric patients may support the choice of particular therapeutic strategies and improve bariatric surgery outcome. Further studies on this issue would be useful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document