Psychopathological characteristics of patients seeking for bariatric surgery, either affected or not by binge eating disorder following the criteria of the DSM IV TR and of the DSM 5

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piergiuseppe Vinai ◽  
Annalisa Da Ros ◽  
Maurizio Speciale ◽  
Nicola Gentile ◽  
Anna Tagliabue ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Thomas ◽  
Katherine A. Koh ◽  
Kamryn T. Eddy ◽  
Andrea S. Hartmann ◽  
Helen B. Murray ◽  
...  

Background.DSM-5revisions have been criticized in the popular press for overpathologizing normative eating patterns—particularly among individuals with obesity. To evaluate the evidence for this and otherDSM-5critiques, we compared the point prevalence and interrater reliability ofDSM-IVversusDSM-5eating disorders (EDs) among adults seeking weight-loss treatment.Method.Clinicians (n=2) assignedDSM-IVandDSM-5ED diagnoses to 100 participants via routine clinical interview. Research assessors (n=3) independently conferred ED diagnoses via Structured Clinical Interview forDSM-IVand aDSM-5checklist.Results. Research assessors diagnosed a similar proportion of participants with EDs underDSM-IV(29%) versusDSM-5(32%).DSM-5research diagnoses included binge eating disorder (9%), bulimia nervosa (2%), subthreshold binge eating disorder (5%), subthreshold bulimia nervosa (2%), purging disorder (1%), night eating syndrome (6%), and other (7%). Interrater reliability between clinicians and research assessors was “substantial” for bothDSM-IV(κ= 0.64, 84% agreement) andDSM-5(κ= 0.63, 83% agreement).Conclusion.DSM-5ED criteria can be reliably applied in an obesity treatment setting and appear to yield an overall ED point prevalence comparable toDSM-IV.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fisher ◽  
Marisol Gonzalez ◽  
Joan Malizio

Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to determine the changes in diagnosis that occur in making the transition from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria in an adolescent medicine eating disorder program. Methods: During the months of September 2011 through December 2012, a data sheet was completed at the end of each new outpatient eating disorder evaluation listing the patient’s gender, age, ethnicity, weight, height, DSM-IV diagnosis, and proposed DSM-5 diagnosis. Distributions were calculated using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon rank sum analyses to determine differences between diagnostic groups. Results: There were 309 patients evaluated during the 16-month period. DSM-IV diagnoses were as follows: anorexia nervosa, 81 patients (26.2%); bulimia nervosa, 29 patients (9.4%); binge eating disorder, 1 patient (0.3%); and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), 198 patients (64.6%). By contrast, DSM-5 diagnoses were as follows: anorexia nervosa, 100 patients; atypical anorexia nervosa, 93 patients; avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, 60 patients; bulimia nervosa, 29 patients; purging disorder, 18 patients; unspecified feeding or eating disorder, 4 patients; subthreshold bulimia nervosa, 2 patients; subthreshold binge eating disorder, 2 patients; and binge eating disorder, 1 patient. Conclusion: Almost two thirds (64.6%) of the 309 patients had a diagnosis of EDNOS based on the DSM-IV criteria. By contrast, only four patients had a diagnosis of unspecified feeding or eating disorder based on the DSM-5 criteria. These data demonstrate that the goal of providing more specific diagnoses for patients with eating disorders has been accomplished very successfully by the new DSM-5 criteria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Borgès Da Silva ◽  
Roxane Borgès Da Silva ◽  
Alexandre Prud'homme ◽  
Pierre Campan ◽  
Jean Michel Azorin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz H TESS ◽  
Letícia MAXIMIANO-FERREIRA ◽  
Denis PAJECKI ◽  
Yuan-Pang WANG

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Eating pathologies among bariatric surgery candidates are common and associated with adverse surgical outcomes, including weight regain and low quality of life. However, their assessment is made difficult by the great variety and inconsistent use of standardized measures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) in presurgical patients and to make a critical appraisal of assessment tools for BED. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1994 to March 2017. Data were extracted, tabulated and summarized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: A total of 21 observational studies were reviewed for data extraction and analysis. Prevalence of BED in bariatric populations ranged from 2% to 53%. Considerable variation in patient characteristics and in BED assessment measures was evident among the studies. In addition, several methodological weaknesses were recognized in most of the studies. Ten different psychometric instruments were used to assess BED. Clinical interviews were used in only 12 studies, though this is the preferred tool to diagnose BED. CONCLUSION: Study heterogeneity accounted for the variability of the results from different centers and methodological flaws such as insufficient sample size and selection bias impaired the evidence on the magnitude of BED in surgical settings. For the sake of comparability and generalizability of the findings in future studies, researchers must recruit representative samples of treatment-seeking candidates for bariatric surgery and systematically apply standard instruments for the assessment of BED.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Ziegler ◽  
J. Mathieu ◽  
P. Böhme ◽  
P. Witkowski

Author(s):  
Robert L. Spitzer ◽  
Michael J. Devlin ◽  
B. Timothy Walsh ◽  
Deborah Hasin ◽  
Rena Wing ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaShanda R. Jones-Corneille ◽  
Thomas A. Wadden ◽  
David B. Sarwer ◽  
Lucy F. Faulconbridge ◽  
Anthony N. Fabricatore ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document