Treatment fidelity in eating disorders and psychological research: Current status and future directions

Author(s):  
Deena Peyser ◽  
Robyn Sysko ◽  
Lauren Webb ◽  
Tom Hildebrandt
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Bardone-Cone ◽  
Stephen A. Wonderlich ◽  
Randy O. Frost ◽  
Cynthia M. Bulik ◽  
James E. Mitchell ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Magnusson

A description of two cases from my time as a school psychologist in the middle of the 1950s forms the background to the following question: Has anything important happened since then in psychological research to help us to a better understanding of how and why individuals think, feel, act, and react as they do in real life and how they develop over time? The studies serve as a background for some general propositions about the nature of the phenomena that concerns us in developmental research, for a summary description of the developments in psychological research over the last 40 years as I see them, and for some suggestions about future directions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 755-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Renhe Liu ◽  
Shuo Qin ◽  
Ruilian Yu ◽  
Yao Fu

Author(s):  
Leah R. Warner ◽  
Stephanie A. Shields

Intersectionality theory concerns the interdependence of systems of inequality and implications for psychological research. Social identities cannot be studied independently of one another nor separately from the societal processes that maintain inequality. In this chapter we provide a brief overview of the history of intersectionality theory and then address how intersectionality theory challenges the way psychological theories typically conceive of the person, as well as the methods of data gathering and analysis customarily used by many psychologists. We specifically address two concerns often expressed by feminist researchers. First, how to reconcile the use of an intersectionality framework with currently-valued psychological science practices. Second, how intersectionality transforms psychology’s concern with individual experience by shifting the focus to the individual’s position within sociostructural frameworks and their social and political underpinnings. In a concluding section we identify two future directions for intersectionality theory: how psychological research on intersectionality can facilitate social activism, and current developments in intersectionality theory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Edward Bennett Saidu ◽  
Chiara Bonini ◽  
Anne Dickinson ◽  
Magdalena Grce ◽  
Marit Inngjerdingen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document