scholarly journals A spatial genetics approach to inform vector control of tsetse flies (Glossina fuscipes fuscipes ) in Northern Uganda

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 5336-5354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norah Saarman ◽  
Mary Burak ◽  
Robert Opiro ◽  
Chaz Hyseni ◽  
Richard Echodu ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e0006702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Jacob ◽  
Denis Loum ◽  
Thomson L. Lakwo ◽  
Charles R. Katholi ◽  
Peace Habomugisha ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e3334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Oloo ◽  
Andrea Sciarretta ◽  
Mohamed M. Mohamed-Ahmed ◽  
Thomas Kröber ◽  
Andrew McMullin ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (13) ◽  
pp. 4627-4637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uzma Alam ◽  
Chaz Hyseni ◽  
Rebecca E. Symula ◽  
Corey Brelsfoard ◽  
Yineng Wu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) are vectors for African trypanosomes (Euglenozoa: kinetoplastida), protozoan parasites that cause African trypanosomiasis in humans (HAT) and nagana in livestock. In addition to trypanosomes, two symbiotic bacteria (Wigglesworthia glossinidiaandSodalis glossinidius) and two parasitic microbes,Wolbachiaand a salivary gland hypertrophy virus (SGHV), have been described in tsetse. Here we determined the prevalence of and coinfection dynamics betweenWolbachia, trypanosomes, and SGHV inGlossina fuscipes fuscipesin Uganda over a large geographical scale spanning the range of host genetic and spatial diversity. Using a multivariate analysis approach, we uncovered complex coinfection dynamics between the pathogens and statistically significant associations between host genetic groups and pathogen prevalence. It is important to note that these coinfection dynamics and associations with the host were not apparent by univariate analysis. These associations between host genotype and pathogen are particularly evident forWolbachiaand SGHV where host groups are inversely correlated forWolbachiaand SGHV prevalence. On the other hand, trypanosome infection prevalence is more complex and covaries with the presence of the other two pathogens, highlighting the importance of examining multiple pathogens simultaneously before making generalizations about infection and spatial patterns. It is imperative to note that these novel findings would have been missed if we had employed the standard univariate analysis used in previous studies. Our results are discussed in the context of disease epidemiology and vector control.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0007340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela I. Schneider ◽  
Norah Saarman ◽  
Maria G. Onyango ◽  
Chaz Hyseni ◽  
Robert Opiro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaz Hyseni ◽  
Agapitus B Kato ◽  
Loyce M Okedi ◽  
Charles Masembe ◽  
Johnson O Ouma ◽  
...  

Acta Tropica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Njelembo J. Mbewe ◽  
Rajinder K. Saini ◽  
Baldwyn Torto ◽  
Janet Irungu ◽  
Abdullahi A. Yusuf ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moïse Kagabadouno ◽  
Oumou Camara ◽  
Mamadou Camara ◽  
Hamidou Ilboudo ◽  
Mariame Camara ◽  
...  

AbstractIn addition to the thousands of deaths due the unprecedented ebola outbreak that stroke West Africa (2014-2016), national health systems in affected countries were deeply challenged impacting a number of diseases control programs. Here we describe the case of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT), a deadly neglected tropical disease due to a trypanosome transmitted by tsetse flies for which no vaccine nor chemoprophylaxis exists. Data are presented for the disease focus of Boffa in Guinea where a pilot elimination project combining medical screening and vector control was launched in 2012. During ebola, HAT active screening activities were postponed and passive surveillance also was progressively impaired. However, tsetse control using small insecticide impregnated targets could be maintained. The over two years disruption of screening activities led to a dramatic increase of HAT prevalence, from 0.7% in 2013 (21/2885) to 2% (69/3448) in 2016, reaching epidemic levels (>5%) in some villages. In deep contrast, control levels reached in 2013 (0.1%; 7/6564) were maintained in areas covered with impregnated targets as no cases were found in 2016 (0/799). In Boffa, ebola has thus incidentally provided a unique framework to assess the impact of current HAT control strategies. A first lesson is that the “screen and treat” strategy is fragile as rapid bursts of the disease may occur in case of disruption. A second lesson is that vector control reducing human-tsetse contacts, even implemented alone, is effective in providing a good level of protection against infection. This advocates for a greater attention being paid to the combination of tsetse control together with medical activities in aiming to reach the HAT elimination objective in Africa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document