scholarly journals Energy, exergy, and economic ( 3E ) evaluation of a CCHP system with biomass gasifier, solid oxide fuel cells, micro‐gas turbine, and absorption chiller

Author(s):  
Junxi Jia ◽  
Guiyan Zang ◽  
Manosh C. Paul
2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 790-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Grigor’yants ◽  
V. I. Zalkind ◽  
P. P. Ivanov ◽  
D. A. Lyalin ◽  
V. I. Miroshnichenko

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Henke ◽  
C. Willich ◽  
M. Steilen ◽  
C. Schnegelberger ◽  
J. Kallo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Georgia C. Karvountzi ◽  
Clifford M. Price ◽  
Paul F. Duby

High temperature fuel cells, such as molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) can be integrated in a hybrid cycle with a gas turbine and a steam turbine and achieve overall lower heating value (LHV) efficiencies of about 70%. A hybrid cycle designed for cogeneration or tri-generation applications could lead to even higher overall LHV efficiencies. Tri-generation is the combined generation of power, heat and cooling from the same fuel source. The purpose of the present paper is to compare the performance of a 20MW MCFC system and a 20MW tubular SOFC system and assess their potential to cogeneration and tri-generation applications. The system includes a fuel cell, a gas turbine, a multiple pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), a steam turbine and an absorption chiller (for cooling). The systems were designed and sized using GatecycleTM heat balance software by GE Enter Software, LLC. In order to optimize each system we developed curves showing LHV “electric” and “cogeneration” efficiency versus power for different ratios of “MCFC and SOFC fuel cell-to-gas turbines size.” At atmospheric pressure and at 675°C (1247°F) the 20MW MCFC system achieves “electric” efficiency of 69.5%. The SOFC at the same pressure and at 980°C achieves 67.3% “electric” efficiency. The MCFC alone is more efficient (58%) than the SOFC alone (56%). However the SOFC produces more heat than the MCFC leading to slightly higher cogeneration and tri-generation efficiencies. Pressurized operation at 9atm boosts the performance of the SOFC system to higher efficiencies (70.5%). Pressurized operation is problematic for the MCFC due to increased cathode corrosion leading to cathode dissolution as well as sealant and interconnection problems. However we can pressurize the MCFC system independently of the fuel cell with the integration of a gas turbine with a compressor pressure ratio of 10 to 16. Thus we achieve efficiencies close to 69%. In conclusion SOFC is more efficiently integrated in a hybrid configuration with gas turbine and a steam turbine for trigeneration applications when pressurized. MCFC is more efficiently integrated at atmospheric and pressures below 6 atm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document