Experimental and theoretical insights into photochemical transformation kinetics and mechanisms of aqueous propylparaben and risk assessment of its degradation products

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1809-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taicheng An ◽  
Hansun Fang ◽  
Guiying Li ◽  
Shilong Wang ◽  
Side Yao
2017 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 642-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansun Fang ◽  
Guiying Li ◽  
Side Yao ◽  
Ximei Liang ◽  
Taicheng An

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 6490-6500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Kimura ◽  
Toshiaki Kubo ◽  
Masatoshi Shimada ◽  
Hideo Kitamura ◽  
Koshito Fujita ◽  
...  

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 2077
Author(s):  
Lilian Seiko Kato ◽  
Carlos A. Conte-Junior

Several food contact materials (FCMs) contain non-intentionally added substances (NIAS), and most of the substances that migrate from plastic food packaging are unknown. This review aimed to situate the main challenges involving unknown NIAS in plastic food packaging in terms of identification, migration tests, prediction, sample preparation, determination methods and risk assessment trials. Most studies have identified NIAS in plastic materials as polyurethane adhesives (PU), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyester coatings, polypropylene materials (PP), multilayers materials, plastic films, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), recycled materials, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Degradation products are almost the primary source of NIAS in plastic FCMs, most from antioxidants as Irganox 1010 and Irgafos 168, following by oligomers and side reaction products. The NIAS assessment in plastics FCMs is usually made by migration tests under worst-case conditions using food simulants. For predicted NIAS, targeted analytical methods are applied using GC-MS based methods for volatile NIAS and GC-MS and LC-MS based methods for semi- and non-volatile NIAS; non-targeted methods to analyze unknown NIAS in plastic FCMs are applied using GC and LC techniques combined with QTOF mass spectrometry (HRMS). In terms of NIAS risk assessment and prioritization, the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept is the most applied tool for risk assessment. Bioassays with sensitive analytical techniques seem to be an efficient method to identify NIAS and their hazard to human exposure; the combination of genotoxicity testing with analytical chemistry could allow the Cramer class III TTC application to prioritize unknown NIAS. The scientific justification for implementing a molecular weight-based cut-off (<1000 Da) in the risk assessment of FCMs should be reevaluated. Although official guides and opinions are being issued on the subject, the whole chain’s alignment is needed, and more specific legislation on the steps to follow to get along with NIAS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa De Laurentiis ◽  
Carsten Prasse ◽  
Thomas A. Ternes ◽  
Marco Minella ◽  
Valter Maurino ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-448
Author(s):  
R. Galli ◽  
G. Kiayias

Abstract A chemical risk assessment for the use of concrete admixtures was performed for the case of naphthalene sulfonate condensate (NS) which is a widely used supeφlastizicer. As a result of its use as a concrete admixture, NS and its degradation products in condensed naphthalene sulfonates can be emitted into the environment. In relation to other products such as detergents, the emissions of NS are classified as very low. The most important emissions of NS originate during its production and during the washing of concrete mixers when the wastewater is allowed to enter the sewers. Future emissions of naphthalene sulfonates are predicted for the case of storage/disposal of concrete waste, or the use of NS-containing concrete waste in road construction. The predicted concentrations of NS and naphthalene sulfonates in Switzerland (either on the regional or local scale) are expected to be below the predicted no-effect concentrations (PNEC values or "safe" concentrations).


1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Zepp ◽  
N. L. Wolfe ◽  
L. V. Azarraga ◽  
R. H. Cox ◽  
C. W. Pape

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document