scholarly journals Designing Efficient L2 Writing Assessment Tasks for Low‐Proficiency Learners of English

Author(s):  
Shoko Sasayama ◽  
Pablo Garcia Gomez ◽  
John M. Norris
2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Elder ◽  
Gary Barkhuizen ◽  
Ute Knoch ◽  
Janet von Randow

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Barrientos

The central purpose of this study was to analyze the dynamics of handwriting movements in real time for Spanish students in early grades with and without learning disabilities. The sample consisted of 120 children from Grades 1 through 3 (primary education), classified into two groups: with learning disabilities and without learning disabilities. The Early Grade Writing Assessment tasks selected for this purpose were writing the alphabet in order from memory, alphabet copying in cursive and manuscript, and allograph selection. The dynamics of these four handwriting tasks were recorded using graphonomic tablets (type Wacom Intuos-4), Intuos Inking pens, and Eye and Pen 2 software. Several events were recorded across four different tasks: velocity, pressure, time invested in pauses, and automaticity. The results demonstrated significant graphonomic variations between groups across grades, depending on the type of task.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Sheri Dion

This paper presents a methodological critique of three empirical studies in second language (L2) French writing assessment. To distinguish key themes in French L2 writing assessment, a literature review was conducted resulting in the identification of 27 studies that were categorized into three major themes. The three studies examined in this article each represent one theme respectively. Within this analysis, the underlying constructs being measured are identified, and the strengths and limitations are deliberated.  Findings from this detailed examination suggest that three examined studies in L2 French writing assessment have significant methodological flaws that raise questions about the claims being made. From this investigation, several studyspecific  recommendations are made, and four general recommendations for improving French L2 writing assessment are offered: (1) the social setting in which L2 assessments take place ought to be a consideration (2) the difficulty of tasks and time on task should be taken into account (3) greater consistency should be used when measuring and denoting a specific level of instruction (i.e. “advanced”) and (4) universal allusions to “fluency” should be avoided when generalizing one component of L2 competency (such as writing achievement) to other aspects of L2 development. Key words: French writing, methodological critique, written assessment, language assessment, second language writing assessment


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document