Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund (DOC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Keyword(s):  
Salmon Recovery

Federal and State Approaches to Salmon Recovery at the Millennium

2006 ◽  
pp. 601-628
Author(s):  
Peter A. Bisson ◽  
James A. Lichatowich ◽  
William J. Liss ◽  
Daniel Goodman ◽  
Charles C. Coutant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salmon Recovery

scholarly journals Hydrologic Resilience from Summertime Fog and Recharge: A Case Study for Coho Salmon Recovery Planning

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-160
Author(s):  
Alicia Torregrosa ◽  
Lorraine E. Flint ◽  
Alan L. Flint
Keyword(s):  
Coho Salmon ◽  
Recovery Planning ◽  
Salmon Recovery

EVALUATING TRIBUTARY RESTORATION POTENTIAL FOR PACIFIC SALMON RECOVERY

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1068-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phaedra Budy ◽  
Howard Schaller
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Salmon ◽  
Salmon Recovery ◽  
Restoration Potential

Inter-agency collaborative approaches to endangered species act compliance and salmon recovery in the pacific northwest

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Lovrich ◽  
Michael J. Gaffney ◽  
Edward P. Weber ◽  
R. Michael Bireley ◽  
Dayna R. Matthews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endangered Species ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Endangered Species Act ◽  
Salmon Recovery ◽  
The Pacific

Public Understanding of Science in Pacific Northwest Salmon Recovery Policy

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dave D. White ◽  
Troy E. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Public Understanding Of Science ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Salmon Recovery ◽  
Understanding Of Science

SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY: QUANTIFYING THE COSTS

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL D. HUPPERT
Keyword(s):  
Snake River ◽  
Salmon Recovery

scholarly journals The watershed body: Transgressing frontiers in riverine sciences, planning stochastic multispecies worlds

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleo Assan Woelfle-Erskine
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Restoration ◽  
Underground Water ◽  
The Body ◽  
Human Engineering ◽  
Salmon Recovery ◽  
Klamath River ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Water Tables ◽  
Russian River ◽  
Engineering Projects

In conversation with Eva Hayward’s writing on transgender embodiment, this paper explores how beaver modify landscapes differently than human engineers, and how human engineering might be transformed through riverine collaborations with beavers. Considering the body variously as a body of water — a river, which draws together all of the above and underground water in a watershed — as like our own trans bodies, and as a slippery double for the psyche of an Anthropocene engineer, July Cole and I argued that thinking with beaver as stochastic transgressors against Manifest Destiny engineering projects could transfigure engineers approaches to their work and river restoration more broadly. What if, rather than trapping beavers into service as “ecosystem engineers,” we assert that humans should engineer as beavers do, in ways that create porous boundaries between land and water and up- and downstream, by way of stick-and-mud, leaky, temporary dams? Here, I theorize a transfigured watershed body through human-beaver-salmon encounters at three salmon recovery sites in the Pacific west: a Karuk-led project on the Klamath river, agency-led beaver relocation projects in the Methow and Yakima watershed, and a citizen science-agency collaborative project in the beaverless Salmon Creek and Russian River watersheds. All three stories concern river and salmon recovery in the Pacific West, where either humans or beavers have initiated collaborative projects to raise water tables, keep rivers from going dry, and improve salmon habitat. These scientists and local knowledge holders’ encounters with beavers and their ponds thick with salmon are inspiring them to change how they undertake habitat restoration projects and also spurring some to reconsider the proper task of human ecologists and engineers, into a mode inspired by beavers themselves.   

Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems

2003 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Expert System ◽  
Statistical Model ◽  
Decision Analysis ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Columbia River ◽  
Columbia River Basin ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Salmon Recovery

<em>Abstract</em>.—We examine decision-support models designed to help recover salmon <em>Oncorhynchus </em>spp. in the Columbia River Basin as a case study for the use of models to help resolve scientific uncertainty and select management options. The models all have somewhat different objectives, use different data, and deal with a variety of salmon-related issues. Divergence of model outputs has, in the past, been used to justify different policy positions, leading some to conclude that science has failed to provide clarity to salmon recovery planning. Three distinct approaches are represented in the models: decision analysis, statistical, and expert system. Of the three approaches, decision analysis provides the clearest management advice and the most formal method for treating uncertainty. Its success depends on the engagement of decision makers in framing questions, identifying management options under consideration, and assigning values to possible outcomes. However, decision analysis could be very difficult to perform. As an alternative, the statistical model is the traditional scientific approach and it can operate with a large degree of detachment from policy. Statistical models proceed by testing hypotheses and estimating life-cycle parameters with available data. They have the advantage of scientific clarity, rigor, and empirical objectivity. The limitation of a statistical model is that the scope of the questions and their answers are restricted by availability of data, and in a domain that is data-poor, many pressing questions go unanswered. Expert system approaches fill gaps in data with expert opinion. In the context of salmon recovery, expert opinion allows consideration of the most concrete menu of specific options for salmon management. Expert opinion is a weaker basis for scientific prediction than is a mathematical relationship validated with empirical data. However, at the level of spatial resolution and environmental detail required to make salmon management decisions affecting the entire Columbia River Basin, there are no validated mathematical formulae for predicting the effects of management actions on salmon, and no adequate data archive exists for deriving such relationships. Communication between scientists and managers is improved when there is a formal institutional mechanism for summarizing scientific results and clarifying the interpretation of models for policy makers. If a modeling effort is driven by a desire to contribute to a particular decision, it is helpful to initially invest in enough communication to ensure that the model really is addressing the right question. Scientists can help managers craft decision rules that are formalized <em>before </em>analyses are undertaken. Decision rules define what measurements will be made, what statistical operations will be performed, and what threshold magnitudes of estimated quantities at specified levels of certainty will serve as criteria for the decision. Such specifications ensure that model results are properly used in the decision process. Committing to these specifications in advance helps dispel suspicions that analyses may be manipulated to achieve a particular outcome.

Civic Science and Salmon Recovery Planning in Puget Sound

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P. Weber ◽  
Thomas M. Leschine ◽  
Jon Brock
Keyword(s):  
Puget Sound ◽  
Recovery Planning ◽  
Salmon Recovery ◽  
Civic Science

Public perceptions and preferences concerning Pacific salmon recovery: an Oregon “voluntary and grassroots” perspective

1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent S Steel ◽  
Nicholas P Lovrich ◽  
E.Susan O’Toole
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Salmon ◽  
Public Perceptions ◽  
Salmon Recovery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document