scholarly journals An imperfect test for a virus can Be worse than No test at all

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Whitmeyer
Keyword(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 898-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Juroshek ◽  
C.A. Hoer ◽  
R.F. Kaiser

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean L Wu ◽  
Andrew Mertens ◽  
Yoshika S Crider ◽  
Anna Nguyen ◽  
Nolan N Pokpongkiat ◽  
...  

Accurate estimates of the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection are critical to informing pandemic response. Current confirmed COVID-19 case counts in the U.S. do not capture the total burden of the pandemic because testing has been primarily restricted to individuals with moderate to severe symptoms due to limited test availability. Using a semi-Bayesian probabilistic bias analysis to account for incomplete testing and imperfect diagnostic accuracy, we estimated 6,275,072 cumulative infections compared to 721,245 confirmed cases (1.9% vs. 0.2% of the population) as of April 18, 2020. Accounting for uncertainty, the number of infections was 3 to 20 times higher than the number of confirmed cases. 86% (simulation interval: 64-99%) of this difference was due to incomplete testing, while 14% (0.3-36%) was due to imperfect test accuracy. Estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infections that transparently account for testing practices and diagnostic accuracy reveal that the pandemic is larger than confirmed case counts suggest.


1984 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Gerber ◽  
Melvyn I. Semmel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document