Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function

Head & Neck ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Danelon Leonhardt ◽  
Harry Quon ◽  
Marcio Abrahão ◽  
Bert W. O'Malley ◽  
Gregory S. Weinstein
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Oropharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
And Function

scholarly journals Importance of Diagnostic Waxing in Oral Rehabilitation: Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-150
Author(s):  
Mariana Lima da Costa Valente ◽  
Marcela Silva Costa ◽  
Paulo Marcos Bérgamo ◽  
Denise Tornavoi de Castro
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Dental Restoration ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Life Planning ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
And Function

Currently, aesthetics, and especially the smile, adds considerable social value. In this way, patients suffering from dental loss wish that their rehabilitation be performed quickly and safely. The aim of oral rehabilitation is to restore masticatory, phonetic, aesthetic and quality of life to the patient. The diagnostic step is one of the most important and relevant steps in establishing a correct treatment plan and, in this way, it is possible to obtain excellent results. The present study aimed to demonstrate the importance of diagnostic waxing in oral rehabilitation. Patient sought treatment at the Dental Prosthesis Specialization Course at Odonto School, due to complaints associated with aesthetics and function. To improve their quality of life, planning of case was carried out through diagnostic waxing and a prosthetic solution was proposed. At the end of treatment and during the follow-up of the case, the patient reported satisfaction and significant improvement in quality of life. It can be concluded that the diagnostic waxing presents customized solutions offering, through a previous study, an effective clinical resolution to the patient. Keywords: Mouth Rehabilitation. Dental Restoration, Temporary. Dental Restoration, Temporary. Resumo Atualmente, a estética, e em especial o sorriso, agregam um valor social considerável. Dessa forma, ao sofrerem a perda dental, os pacientes desejam que sua reabilitação seja realizada de forma rápida e segura. A reabilitação oral tem como objetivo devolver ao paciente a eficiência mastigatória, fonética, estética e a qualidade de vida. A etapa diagnóstica constitui um dos passos mais importantes e relevantes no estabelecimento de um correto planejamento do tratamento e, desta forma, torna-se possível obter resultados de excelência. O presente estudo teve como objetivo demonstrar a importância do enceramento diagnóstico na reabilitação oral. Paciente procurou tratamento no Curso de Especialização em Prótese Dentária da Odonto School, devido a queixas associadas a estética e função. Para melhorar sua qualidade de vida, foi realizado o planejamento do caso por meio do enceramento diagnóstico e uma solução protética foi proposta. Ao final do tratamento e durante o acompanhamento do caso, a paciente relatou satisfação e melhora significativa na qualidade de vida. Pode-se concluir que o enceramento diagnóstico apresenta soluções personalizadas oferecendo, por meio de estudo prévio, uma resolução clínica efetiva ao paciente. Palavras-chave: Reabilitação Bucal. Restauração Dentária Temporária. Prótese Dentária Temporária.

scholarly journals Comparison of Quality of Life among Patients with Oro-Hypopharyngeal Cancer after Tonsillectomy and Panscopy Using Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1295-1303
Author(s):  
Amir M. Salehi ◽  
Lena Norberg-Spaak ◽  
Torben Wilms ◽  
Simon Vallin ◽  
Linda Boldrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Hypopharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Self Assessment

Studies have shown lower treatment-related morbidity when using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) compared to conventional surgery. Patients investigated for oro- and hypopharyngeal cancer (T1, T2) were compared concerning quality of life (QoL) after tonsillectomy and TORS using validated QoL questionnaires: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35. The patients treated with TORS showed a higher pain score and thus also a higher need for painkillers, whereas they had lower values on self-assessment of anxiety/depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score. The pre- and postoperative information given did not meet the expectations of the patients treated with conventional surgery. The present data show advantages of the TORS technique from the patients’ perspective. Even if patients treated with TORS are in need of more painkilling treatment, they cope better with the long-term effects of treatment, as judged by self-assessment of anxiety and depression.

scholarly journals Comparison of patient reported outcomes after Triathlon® and Kinemax Plus prostheses

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Dixon ◽  
AW Blom ◽  
MR Whitehouse ◽  
V Wylde
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
Quality Of Life Scale ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
One Year ◽  
And Function

INTRODUCTION The Triathlon® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, US) total knee replacement was designed to improve patient function and survivorship. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Triathlon® prosthesis produces better patient reported outcomes than a previous design by the same manufacturer, the Kinemax Plus. METHODS The outcome of 233 knees of patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 40–80 years) who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis were compared with the outcomes of 220 knees of patients with a mean age of 70 years (range: 42–90 years) who received the Triathlon® prosthesis. Data were collected via postal questionnaire prior to surgery as well as at 8–12 weeks and at 1 year following surgery. Validated questionnaires were used including the WOMAC® (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) pain and function scales, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life scale and the self-administered patient satisfaction scale. RESULTS This study found that patients who had the Triathlon® prosthesis had significantly better pain relief (p<0.0001), function (p=0.028), knee related quality of life (p<0.0001) and satisfaction (p=0.0003) at three months after surgery than those who received the Kinemax Plus prosthesis. In addition, knee related quality of life (p=0.002) and satisfaction (p=0.021) were significantly higher at one year after surgery in Triathlon® patients. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that return to function and reduction in pain may occur more quickly in patients with a Triathlon® prosthesis than in those with the Kinemax Plus.

Quality of life and functional evaluation in patients with tongue base tumors treated exclusively with transoral robotic surgery: A 1-year follow-up study

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1561-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Mercante ◽  
Alessandra Masiello ◽  
Isabella Sperduti ◽  
Giovanni Cristalli ◽  
Raul Pellini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Tongue Base ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Follow Up Study

scholarly journals Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-303
Author(s):  
Farbood Kalantari ◽  
Shahin Rajaeih ◽  
Ali Daneshvar ◽  
Zahra Karbasi ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Salem
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
The Body ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Head and neck cancers are the most common cancers in the body. Treatments are determined on the basis of the location and stage of the primary tumor. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the tumor, prevent recurrence or metastasis, and maintain the quality of life. There are several treatments available for the management of head and neck cancers, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, new molecular agents, and a combination of them. Transoral robotic technique is a short-time operation using a type of robotic machine in which the patient undergoes anesthesia for a shorter time and the side effects of this operation and the time of hospitalization are less than open surgery. Due to the importance of speed and accuracy in head and neck cancer surgery and the importance of application of robotics in surgery, the present study was designed and implemented to review the application of robotics in the management of head and neck cancers. In this review study, the keywords: application, robotic, surgical, head cancer, transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and neck cancer, were searched in ISI, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar databases. Related articles written domestically or abroad that have covered areas such as the background of transoral robotic surgery, maintaining organ function and approaches, the advantages and disadvantages of TORS, the affordability of TORS, the combination of TORS with other therapeutic approaches published from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed. The use of robotic surgery for precise operations such as head and neck cancers seems to be essential. More advanced robotic devices are expected to expand the surgery treatment for head and neck cancers as well as the results of using TORS for oncologic optimization and acceptability of results while maintaining organ function and patient's quality of life.

Patient-reported diarrhea impact on physical functioning and quality of life in clinical trial data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19105-e19105
Author(s):  
Ting-Yu Chen ◽  
Bellinda King-Kallimanis ◽  
Lyna Merzoug ◽  
Mallorie Fiero ◽  
Jennifer J Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Cancer Trials ◽  
And Function

e19105 Background: Patient-reported outcomes can provide symptom and function data that complement standard oncology endpoints. Frequently, trials will conclude there was no clinically meaningful detriment to health-related quality of life (HRQL) or function, even when notable toxicity is observed. It is possible that mean change from baseline analyses obscures meaningful change in subgroups experiencing symptomatic toxicity. In this study, we explore how patients’ response to a diarrhea item related to physical function (PF) and HRQL in trials submitted to US FDA. Methods: We analyzed 3 randomized, double-blind breast cancer trials (early to late line metastatic) where diarrhea was a more common AE-symptom in the treatment arm, but there was not a large detriment in the mean change from baseline for HRQL and PF. Trials included the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), which captures patient-reported HRQL, symptoms, and functioning. Higher scores (range 0-100) indicate better functioning and HRQL. Symptoms were measured with a 4-point scale; not at all to very much. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze diarrhea, PF, and HRQL over time. Results: Patients reporting very much diarrhea at month 3 had worse PF and HRQL compared to patients reporting no diarrhea . The range of difference between patients who reported very much diarrhea and those with none was 8-18 points for PF across trials. For HRQL scores, the range was 13–17 points worse. This trend was also seen in the control arm and at other times. Conclusions: In this set of breast cancer trials with differences in diarrhea by arm, reporting “no meaningful difference in PF or HRQL between the arms” is insufficient and potentially misleading. A more informative interpretation is that an exploratory analysis of HRQL and PF did not show in the investigational arm; there was a greater proportion of patients reporting diarrhea on the treatment arm; and patients reporting more frequent diarrhea reported lower HRQL and PF compared to patients with no diarrhea, regardless of arm. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Rutherford Claudication Severity Compared to Patient Reported Quality of Life and Function

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-530
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Heneghan ◽  
Beth Devine ◽  
Mark H. Meissner ◽  
Donald Patrick ◽  
Rebecca G. Symons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
And Function
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document