Effects of an Exercise Adherence Intervention on Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Duncan ◽  
Bunny Pozehl
Heart & Lung ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 696-701
Author(s):  
Shane Warehime ◽  
Danae Dinkel ◽  
Windy Alonso ◽  
Bunny Pozehl

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 605-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallav Deka ◽  
Bunny Pozehl ◽  
Joseph F Norman ◽  
Deepak Khazanchi

Background: Use of wrist-worn activity monitors has increased over the past few years; however, the use of the Fitbit® Charge HR (FCHR) in a community setting in patients with heart failure has not been tested. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility, practicality and acceptability of utilizing the FCHR to validate self-reported exercise diaries and monitor exercise in community dwelling patients with heart failure. Methods: Thirty heart failure patients (12 females and 18 males) aged 64.7 ± 11.5 years were provided with a FCHR. Participants were provided with an exercise routine and for eight weeks, recorded their exercise sessions in self-reported exercise diaries and used the FCHR to record those exercise sessions. Results: Exercise data from the self-reported exercise diaries were validated with data from the FCHR. Participants’ perception and acceptance of using the FCHR was positive. Validation of exercise and physical activity interventions using the FCHR appears feasible and acceptable in patients with heart failure. Conclusion: Wrist-worn activity monitors can be useful for objective measurement of exercise adherence and monitoring of physical activity in patients with heart failure in a community setting.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Tierney ◽  
Mamas Mamas ◽  
Dawn Skelton ◽  
Stephen Woods ◽  
Martin K. Rutter ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ifeanyi Madujibeya ◽  
Terry Lennie ◽  
Adaeze Aroh ◽  
Misook L Chung ◽  
Debra Moser

BACKGROUND The computing and communication features of mobile devices are increasingly leveraged in mHealth interventions to provide comprehensive and tailored support that may have positive outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, examination of mHealth intervention effectiveness has provided mixed findings. Considering that patient engagement is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of interventions, understanding how patients engage with mHealth interventions, and the effects of patient engagement on HF outcomes may explain the mixed findings. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to synthesize current evidence on measures of patient engagement with mHealth interventions, and the effects of engagement on HF outcomes METHODS A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted in 7 databases for relevant studies published in the English Language from 2009 to September 2021. Descriptive characteristics of studies were reported. Content analysis was conducted to identify themes that described patient engagement with mHealth in the qualitative studies included in the review. RESULTS We synthesized 32 studies that operationalized engagement with mHealth interventions in 4771 patients with HF (67.9% male), ranging from a sample of 7 to 1571, with a median of 53.3 patients. Patient engagement with mHealth interventions was measured only quantitatively based on system usage data (71.8%, 23/32), only qualitatively based on data from semi-structured interviews and focus groups (6.3%, 2/32), and by a combination of both quantitative and qualitative data (21.9%, 7/32). System usage data were evaluated using 6 metrics of engagement: (1) number of physiological parameters transmitted (63.3%, 19/30); (2) number of HF questionnaires completed (6.7%, 2/30); (3) numbers of logins (13.3%, 4/30); (4) number of short message service (SMS) responses (3.3%, 1/30); (5) time spent (16.7%, 5/30); (6) number of features accessed/screen viewed (9.5%, 4/30). There was a lack of consistency in how system usage metrics were reported across the studies. Eighty percent of the studies reported only the descriptive characteristics of the system usage data. Emotional, cognitive, and behavioral domains of patient engagement were identified in qualitative studies. Patient engagement levels ranged from 45% to 100% and decreased over time. The effects of engagement on HF knowledge, self-care, exercise adherence, and HF hospitalizations were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS The operational definitions of patient engagement with mHealth interventions are underreported and lack consistency. The application of inferential analytical methods to engagement data is extremely limited. More research focused on developing optimal and standardized measures of patient engagement that may be applied across different study designs is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document