Using an abbreviated assessment to identify effective error-correction procedures for individual learners during discrete-trial instruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina A. Carroll ◽  
Jennifer Owsiany ◽  
Jessica M. Cheatham
2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina A. Carroll ◽  
Brad T. Joachim ◽  
Claire C. St. Peter ◽  
Nicole Robinson

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Isenhower ◽  
Lara Delmolino ◽  
Kate E. Fiske ◽  
Meredith Bamond ◽  
Justin B. Leaf

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina A. Carroll ◽  
Tiffany Kodak ◽  
Wayne W. Fisher

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy K. Magee ◽  
Janet Ellis

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2019-V1-I1) ◽  
pp. 28-56

Öz Gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocuklara farklı becerilerin öğretiminde yaygın olarak kullanılan ayrık denemelerle öğretim, ipuçlarını kullanarak doğru tepkileri artırmayı amaçlayan, doğru tepkilerin pekiştirilmesini ve yanlış tepkilerin düzeltilmesini içeren etkili bir uygulamadır. Ayrık denemelerle öğretimin temel bileşenlerinden biri, hataları düzelterek ileride bu hataların sergilenmesini azaltmayı amaçlayan hata düzeltmesidir. Hata düzeltmesi, öğretim sırasında çocuğun hata yapmasının hemen ardından, uygulamacının farklı şekillerde çocuğun hatasını düzeltmesidir. Ayrık denemelerle öğretimde hata düzeltmesi, farklı şekillerde gerçekleştirilebilmektedir. Bunlardan bazıları; sözel geribildirim ya da hata ifadesi, kısa süreli mola, doğru tepki için model olma, tek tepki tekrarı/aktif öğrenci tepkisi, çok tepki tekrarı/tekrarlanan tepki, bağımsızlaşana kadar tekrar sunma, deneme tekrarı ve türlerin bir arada kullanımıdır. Derleme biçiminde hazırlanan bu makalenin amacı uygulamacılara, ayrık denemelerle öğretim hakkında kısa bir bilgilendirme yapmak ve bir bileşen olarak hata düzeltmesinin ne olduğunu ve neden önemli olduğunu açıklamaktır. Ayrıca ayrık denemelerle öğretim yaparken sıklıkla kullanılan hata düzeltmesi türlerini tanıtmak, hata düzeltmesi türlerini akış şemaları yoluyla kavramsallaştırmak, hata düzeltmesi türlerinin nasıl kullanılacağını örneklerle anlatmak ve bu hata düzeltmesi türlerini kullanarak gerçekleştirilen araştırmalar konusunda bilgilendirme yapmaktır. Abstract Discrete trial training is an effective intervention commonly used in teaching different skills to children with developmental disabilities. It aims to increase the correct responses using prompts, reinforcements, and error correction strategies. One of the main components of the discrete trial training is error correction, which aims to reduce errors in the future by correcting errors. In error correction, the instructor corrects the child’s error using different strategies immediately after the child makes a mistake during training. There are several types of error correction strategies commonly used in discrete trial training; (a) vocal feedback or error statement, (b) a brief time-out, (c) a model for the correct response, (d) single response repetition/active student response, (e) multi-response repetition/repeated response, (f) re-present until independent, (g) remove and re-present, and (h) the combination of the strategies. The purpose of this study is to provide a brief overview of discrete trial training, to explain the error correction procedures and their importance, to introduce the types of error correction strategies used in discrete trial training, to conceptualize error correction strategies through flowcharts, to explain how to use error correction strategies, and to inform about the error correction literature.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-543
Author(s):  
James W. Moore ◽  
Kayla Russo ◽  
Angelina Gilfeather ◽  
Heather M. Whipple ◽  
Greg Stanford

1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Schloss ◽  
Paul T. Sindelar ◽  
G. Phillip Cartwright ◽  
Cynthia N. Schloss

Recent research investigating the effectiveness of computer assisted instructional modules with varying ratios of higher cognitive and factual questions has shown that the ratio of higher cognitive to factual questions in and of itself may not influence student achievement. Whether higher cognitive and factual questions interact with error correction procedures to enhance achievement remains unanswered. In the present investigation, 2 (question type, Le., higher cognitive vs. factual) X 2 (error response, i.e., re-presentation of instruction vs. instructions to try again) X 4 (test, i.e., higher cognitive items included in module, novel higher cognitive items, factual questions included in module, and novel factual items) split plot factorial (two within and one between factor) analyses of variance were used to determine whether question type and/or error response differentially affected subsequent responses to factual and higher cognitive questions. The results indicated that simply allowing a student to try again was superior to re-presenting content for the factual question modules. This finding is discussed with reference to the cognitive demands of the tasks, both anticipated and observed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 66-86
Author(s):  
Sandra Buratović Maštrapa ◽  
Romana John ◽  
Mato Brautović

Accuracy is at the core of what journalists do and it amounts to journalistic commitment to report without errors. This tenet of journalism is now in danger, because of the influence of digitalization, changes in media landscapes, and the utilization of the assertation model of journalism. In this study, we used a combination of content analysis and visual network analysis to investigate how subjective errors are disseminated through an online environment, how time/speed influences the propagation of errors, and what the error correction procedures/routines are. The results demonstrate that 69% of the analyzed stories contained errors, and the main cause of such errors was the use of secondary sources, instead of primary ones, these errors transcend national borders and, time/speed had only a minor role in the emergence and correction of the errors, etc. Out of the 107 media websites analyzed, only seventeen provide certain modalities of requesting error correction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document