The effect of light upon the sensitivity of wheat seedlings to x-rays

1935 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon C. Chesley
Planta ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona R�cz ◽  
I. Kir�ly ◽  
D. L�sztily

The paper contains some personal reflections on Rutherford as a scientist and as a person. It describes his remarkable initial work on radio in Canterbury College, Christchurch, New Zealand, after the work of Hertz, which was then continued in the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge. It is likely that Rutherford was ahead of Marconi in 1895. Here also he used the photo-emissive effect (discovered by Hertz) in his work with J. J. Thomson. He then switched in 1897 to X-rays and radioactivity. The paper then returns to the origin of opto-electronics by the dis­covery of the electrical effect of light by E. Becquerel in 1839 ( C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 9, 145; 561). The development of transmission of information by electrical signals over wires which led to Bell’s telephone in 1876 is outlined, and the discovery of the photo-conductive effect in 1873, which led to an outburst of ideas for television and the first real demonstration by Ayrton & Perry in 1880 ( Jl B. Soc. Arts 29, 468). H ertz’s two discoveries (used by Rutherford), the discovery of the electron by J. J. Thomson, and the invention of the Braun tube in 1897 gave a great boost to the idea of television. The major idea that came from A. A. Campbell Swinton in about 1903 was that the cathode ray tube was the key to successful television. This was published in the epochmaking note in Nature, Lond . in 1908 which laid the foundation for modern television.


1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-758
Author(s):  
V. M. Koval' ◽  
Yu. A. Kopylov ◽  
T. N. Trofimova ◽  
L. A. Svergunenko

Radiology ◽  
1933 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanematsu Sugiura
Keyword(s):  
X Rays ◽  

Science ◽  
1931 ◽  
Vol 73 (1898) ◽  
pp. 531-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Cattell
Keyword(s):  
X Rays ◽  

1994 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
E. Hildner

AbstractOver the last twenty years, orbiting coronagraphs have vastly increased the amount of observational material for the whitelight corona. Spanning almost two solar cycles, and augmented by ground-based K-coronameter, emission-line, and eclipse observations, these data allow us to assess,inter alia: the typical and atypical behavior of the corona; how the corona evolves on time scales from minutes to a decade; and (in some respects) the relation between photospheric, coronal, and interplanetary features. This talk will review recent results on these three topics. A remark or two will attempt to relate the whitelight corona between 1.5 and 6 R⊙to the corona seen at lower altitudes in soft X-rays (e.g., with Yohkoh). The whitelight emission depends only on integrated electron density independent of temperature, whereas the soft X-ray emission depends upon the integral of electron density squared times a temperature function. The properties of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) will be reviewed briefly and their relationships to other solar and interplanetary phenomena will be noted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document