scholarly journals Preferences for transitional HIV care among people living with HIV recently released from prison in Zambia: a discrete choice experiment

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Ostermann ◽  
Valerie Yelverton ◽  
Helene J. Smith ◽  
Mirriam Nanyangwe ◽  
Lillian Kashela ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Dommaraju ◽  
Jill Hagey ◽  
Thomas A. Odeny ◽  
Sharon Okaka ◽  
Julie Kadima ◽  
...  

Introduction To improve retention on HIV treatment in Africa, public health programs are promoting a family of innovations to service delivery—referred to as “differentiated service delivery” (DSD) models—which seek to better meet the needs of both systems and patients by reducing unnecessary encounters, expanding access, and incorporating peers and patients in patient care. Data on the relative desirability of different models to target populations, which is currently sparse, can help guide prioritization of specific models during scale-up. Methods We conducted a discrete choice experiment to assess patient preferences for various characteristics of treatment services. Clinically stable people living with HIV were recruited from an HIV clinic in Kisumu, Kenya. We selected seven attributes of DSD models drawn from literature review and previous qualitative work. We created a balanced and orthogonal design to identify main term effects. A total of ten choice tasks were solicited per respondent. We calculated relative utility (RU) for each attribute level, a numerical representation of the strength of patient preference. Data were analyzed using a Hierarchical Bayesian model via Sawtooth Software. Results One hundred and four respondents (37.5% men, 41.1 years mean age) preferred receiving care at a health facility, compared with home-delivery or a community meeting point (RU = 69.3, -16.2, and -53.1, respectively; p << 0.05); receiving those services from clinicians and pharmacists—as opposed to lay health workers or peers (RU = 21.5, 5.9, -24.5; p < 0.05); and preferred an individual support system over a group support system (RU = 15.0 and 4.2; p < 0.05). Likewise, patients strongly preferred longer intervals between both clinical reviews (RU = 40.1 and -50.7 for 6- and 1-month spacing, respectively; p < 0.05) and between ART collections (RU = 33.6 and -49.5 for 6- and1-month spacing, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusion Although health systems find community- and peer-based DSD models attractive, clinically stable patients expressed a preference for facility-based care as long as clinical visits were extended to biannual. These data suggest that multi-month scripting and fast-track models best align with patient preferences, an insight which can help prioritize use of different DSD models in the region.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e1002636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Zanolini ◽  
Kombatende Sikombe ◽  
Izukanji Sikazwe ◽  
Ingrid Eshun-Wilson ◽  
Paul Somwe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Zimba ◽  
Chunki Fong ◽  
Madellena Conte ◽  
Abigail Baim-Lance ◽  
McKaylee Robertson ◽  
...  

Introduction The PROMISE study was launched in 2018 to assess and document the implementation of changes to an existing HIV Care Coordination Program (CCP) designed to address persistent disparities in care and treatment engagement among persons with HIV in New York City. We evaluated provider endorsement of features of the CCP to identify opportunities for improvement. Methods We used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure provider endorsement of four CCP attributes, including: a) how CCP helps with medication adherence, b) how CCP helps with primary care appointments, c) how CCP helps with issues other than primary care, and d) where CCP visits take place (visit location). Each attribute had three to four levels. Our primary outcomes were relative importance and part-worth utilities, measures of preference for the levels of the four CCP program attributes. Results Visit location (28.6%) had the highest relative importance, followed by how staff help with ART adherence (24.3%), how staff help with issues other than primary care (24.2%), and how staff help with primary care appointments (22.9%). Within each of the above attributes, respectively, the levels with the highest part-worth utilities were home visits 60 minutes from the program or agency (19.9 utiles, 95% CI 10.7-29.0), directly observed therapy (26.1 utiles, 95% CI 19.1-33.1), help with non-HIV specialty medical care (26.5 utiles, 95% CI 21.5-31.6), and reminding clients about and accompanying them to primary care appointments (20.8 utiles, 95% CI 15.6-26.0). Conclusions Ongoing CCP refinements should account for how best to support and evaluate the intensive CCP components endorsed by providers in this study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (7) ◽  
pp. 1243-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Roach ◽  
Bruce K. Christensen ◽  
Elizabeth Rieger

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Peters ◽  
E van Grinsven ◽  
M van de Haterd ◽  
D van Lankveld ◽  
J Verbakel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenevieve Opoku ◽  
Rupali K Doshi ◽  
Amanda D Castel ◽  
Ian Sorensen ◽  
Michael Horberg ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND HIV cohort studies have been used to assess health outcomes and inform the care and treatment of people living with HIV disease. However, there may be similarities and differences between cohort participants and the general population from which they are drawn. OBJECTIVE The objective of this analysis was to compare people living with HIV who have and have not been enrolled in the DC Cohort study and assess whether participants are a representative citywide sample of people living with HIV in the District of Columbia (DC). METHODS Data from the DC Health (DCDOH) HIV surveillance system and the DC Cohort study were matched to identify people living with HIV who were DC residents and had consented for the study by the end of 2016. Analysis was performed to identify differences between DC Cohort and noncohort participants by demographics and comorbid conditions. HIV disease stage, receipt of care, and viral suppression were evaluated. Adjusted logistic regression assessed correlates of health outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS There were 12,964 known people living with HIV in DC at the end of 2016, of which 40.1% were DC Cohort participants. Compared with nonparticipants, participants were less likely to be male (68.0% vs 74.9%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001) but more likely to be black (82.3% vs 69.5%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and have a heterosexual contact HIV transmission risk (30.3% vs 25.9%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001). DC Cohort participants were also more likely to have ever been diagnosed with stage 3 HIV disease (59.6% vs 47.0%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), have a CD4 &lt;200 cells/µL in 2017 (6.2% vs 4.6%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), be retained in any HIV care in 2017 (72.9% vs 59.4%, <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and be virally suppressed in 2017. After adjusting for demographics, DC Cohort participants were significantly more likely to have received care in 2017 (adjusted odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.70-2.00) and to have ever been virally suppressed (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.20-1.40). CONCLUSIONS These data have important implications when assessing the representativeness of patients enrolled in clinic-based cohorts compared with the DC-area general HIV population. As participants continue to enroll in the DC Cohort study, ongoing assessment of representativeness will be required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel C. Mühlbacher ◽  
John F. P. Bridges ◽  
Susanne Bethge ◽  
Ch.-Markos Dintsios ◽  
Anja Schwalm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document