What Ought We to Do With “Thick Terms”? A Response to Frankfurt & Coady's “Bringing Philosophy to Bear on Moral Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Construct Validation”

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 642-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob K. Farnsworth ◽  
Lauren M. Borges ◽  
Jason A. Nieuwsma
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig J. Bryan ◽  
AnnaBelle O. Bryan ◽  
Erika Roberge ◽  
Feea R. Leifker ◽  
David C. Rozek

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantelle S. Lloyd ◽  
Andrew A. Nicholson ◽  
Maria Densmore ◽  
Jean Théberge ◽  
Richard W. J. Neufeld ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 442-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delin Sun ◽  
Rachel D. Phillips ◽  
Hannah L. Mulready ◽  
Stephen T. Zablonski ◽  
Jessica A. Turner ◽  
...  

The Good Kill ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 15-39
Author(s):  
Marc LiVecche

Chapter 1 explores in greater detail both the medical and phenomenological foundations of moral injury and its consequences upon the morally injured. It examines the clinical history that led to the recognition of the need for a diagnosis different than, though related to, posttraumatic stress disorder, and it zeroes in on moral injury’s relationship to killing in combat. It goes on to demonstrate the ubiquity of the belief, even among warfighters, that killing is morally evil—even if it is also morally necessary in war. Through again referencing clinical work, and introducing some of the key clinicians focusing on the moral injury construct, the paradoxical relationship between killing and moral injury is then linked to the suicide crisis afflicting combat veterans.


Author(s):  
Karis L. Callaway ◽  
C. Richard Spates

Discussions of morality and mobral transgressions in the context of warfare have resurfaced as professionals and service members alike attempt to understand its complexities. Recently, the behavioral health field has seen an increase in the availability of academic literature on moral injury, a concept related yet separate from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. However, extensive gaps in the knowledge remain. This article identifies what is currently understood about this construct, and aims to promote professional discussion, investigation, and field progression. Ultimately, advancements in the conceptualization of moral injury are expected to affect the services offered to the veteran and military member populations.


Author(s):  
Laura Roldán-Sevillano

Martin Amis’s Time’s Arrow (1991) gave rise to much controversy when it came out, for this novella revolves around a traumatised Nazi doctor exiled in the US whose life is narrated in a disorienting reverse chronology by what would seem to be his own dissociated conscience. Despite the abundant academic publications on this experimental narrative, such as those that read it as a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) piece of fiction, the origin of the protagonist’s damaged psyche and the diverse symptoms he suffers from have not yet been explored from the viewpoint of perpetrator trauma, a moral-related syndrome distinct from PTSD that affects victimisers haunted by remorse. Drawing on trauma theory and the recently developed concepts of perpetration-induced traumatic stress (PITS) and moral injury, this article aims to contribute to the scholarly conversation on Amis’s novella by arguing that its narrative voice, backwards temporality, intertextuality and recurrent motifs perform the perpetrator/protagonist’s moral-based trauma provoked by an acute sense of shameful guilt and the fear of being discovered. The article concludes by suggesting that, through this staggering work, Amis gives readers not only an opportunity to actively remember and reflect on the Nazi genocide but also an insight into trauma from an unusual but necessary perspective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document