Factors Associated with Lymph Node Count in Mucosal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Neck Dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Bhalli ◽  
Shuqing Chen ◽  
Andrew Day ◽  
Brittny Tillman ◽  
Eli Gordin ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhou ◽  
Wen-Wen Zhang ◽  
San-Gang Wu ◽  
Zhen-Yu He ◽  
Jia-Yuan Sun ◽  
...  

Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Baba ◽  
Masayuki Watanabe ◽  
Hironobu Shigaki ◽  
Shiro Iwagami ◽  
Takatsugu Ishimoto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K Devaraja ◽  
K Pujary ◽  
B Ramaswamy ◽  
D R Nayak ◽  
N Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield. Methods This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020. Results From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001). Conclusion Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Gu ◽  
Qigen Fang ◽  
Yao Wu ◽  
Wei Du ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The feasibility of submandibular gland (SMG) preservation in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has occasionally been analyzed, but the differences in survival associated with the presence or absence of SMG preservation remain unknown. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the oncologic results of SMG preservation in cT1-2 N0 buccal SCC. Methods This was a prospective, non-randomized cohort study. Patients with surgically treated cT1-2 N0 buccal SCC were prospectively enrolled and divided into two groups based on the management of the SMG. Level 1b lymph nodes were categorized into six groups based on the positional relationship between the lymph node and the SMG. The main study endpoints were locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results A total of 31 of the 137 included patients underwent SMG-sparing neck dissection. Patients with SMG preservation were likely to be young persons. Superior metastasis occurred in 11 patients with a prevalence of 8.0%, followed by an anterior metastasis rate of 5.1%, and no metastases developed deeply or within the SMG. The 5-year LRC rates in the SMG-sparing and SMG-excision groups were 74 and 75%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.970). The 5-year DSS rates in the SMG-sparing and SMG-excision groups were 74 and 69%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.709). Conclusions SMG involvement was rare, and the superior group carried the highest risk for lymph node metastasis. SMG-sparing neck dissection is selectively suggested in cT1-2 N0 buccal SCC patients, and could avoid postoperative asymmetric appearance and dry mouth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document