Non‐Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease: Validation of the Non‐Motor Fluctuation Assessment Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galit Kleiner ◽  
Hubert H. Fernandez ◽  
Kelvin L. Chou ◽  
Alfonso Fasano ◽  
Kevin R. Duque ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
José-Francisco Rocha ◽  
Georg Ebersbach ◽  
Andrew Lees ◽  
Eduardo Tolosa ◽  
Joaquim J. Ferreira ◽  
...  

Introduction: Opicapone (OPC) was efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of-dose motor fluctuations (BIPARK-I and -II). Post-hoc analyses of these trials evaluated the efficacy of OPC following pre-defined segmentation of the wide spectrum of motor fluctuations in PD.Methods: Data from matching treatment arms in BIPARK-I and -II were combined for the placebo (PLC) and OPC 50-mg groups, and exploratory post-hoc analyses were performed to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg vs. PLC in subgroups of patients who were in “earlier” vs. “later” stages of both their disease course (e.g., duration of PD <6 years vs. ≥6 years) and levodopa treatment pathway (e.g., number of daily levodopa intakes <4 vs. ≥4). Efficacy variables included changes from baseline in absolute OFF-time and total ON-time.Results: The Full Analysis Set included 517 patients (PLC, n = 255; OPC 50 mg, n = 262). OPC 50 mg was significantly more effective than PLC in reducing OFF-time and increasing ON-time in the majority of subgroup analyses (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in “earlier” stages of both their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway experienced numerically greater efficacy when using OPC 50 mg, in comparison with those in “later” stages.Conclusion: OPC 50 mg was efficacious over the whole trajectory of motor fluctuation evolution in PD patients. There was also a signal for enhanced efficacy in patients who were earlier vs. later in their disease course and levodopa treatment pathway.





2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (3b) ◽  
pp. 787-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Guzzo Souza ◽  
Vanderci Borges ◽  
Sonia Maria Cesar de Azevedo Silva ◽  
Henrique Ballalai Ferraz

Quality of life (QoL) is an important treatment outcome indicator in Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of the Parkinson's disease questionnaire - PDQ-39 (Brazilian Portuguese Version) in measuring QoL of PD patients with or without motor fluctuations. Fifty-six PD patients with mean disease duration of 7.4 years were assessed and 41 of them (73.3%) had motor fluctuations. The PDQ-39 has eight dimensions ranging from 0 to 100; being the higher the score, the worse the QoL. Comparing groups with and without motor fluctuations showed that the dimensions mobility, activities of daily living (ADL), communication and bodily discomfort scored higher in the fluctuating group. There was a tendency to see that the higher the Hoehn and Yahr (HY) scale stages, the higher the PDQ-39 scores. Patients suffering from the disease for more than five years had worse PDQ-39 scores only in the items ADL and communication, when compared with those with the disease for < 5 years. The PDQ-39 is an instrument that detects decrease in QoL of PD patients and the presence of motor fluctuations predicts QoL reduction.



2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Vergara-Diaz ◽  
Jean-Francois Daneault ◽  
Federico Parisi ◽  
Chen Admati ◽  
Christina Alfonso ◽  
...  

AbstractParkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. Dyskinesia and motor fluctuations are complications of PD medications. An objective measure of on/off time with/without dyskinesia has been sought for some time because it would facilitate the titration of medications. The objective of the dataset herein presented is to assess if wearable sensor data can be used to generate accurate estimates of limb-specific symptom severity. Nineteen subjects with PD experiencing motor fluctuations were asked to wear a total of five wearable sensors on both forearms and shanks, as well as on the lower back. Accelerometer data was collected for four days, including two laboratory visits lasting 3 to 4 hours each while the remainder of the time was spent at home and in the community. During the laboratory visits, subjects performed a battery of motor tasks while clinicians rated limb-specific symptom severity. At home, subjects were instructed to use a smartphone app that guided the periodic performance of a set of motor tasks.





1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 900-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. O'Sullivan ◽  
Catherine M. Said ◽  
Louise C. Dillon ◽  
Marion Hoffman ◽  
Andrew J. Hughes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document