Evaluation of fully automated myocardial segmentation techniques in native and contrast‐enhanced T1‐mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using fully convolutional neural networks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia A. Farrag ◽  
Aidan Lochbihler ◽  
James A. White ◽  
Eranga Ukwatta
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liset Vázquez Romaguera ◽  
Francisco Perdigón Romero ◽  
Cicero Ferreira Fernandes Costa Filho ◽  
Marly Guimarães Fernandes Costa

Author(s):  
Ching Wai Yong ◽  
Khin Wee Lai ◽  
Belinda Pingguan Murphy ◽  
Yan Chai Hum

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint inflammation which may lead to disability. Although OA is not lethal, this disease will remarkably affect patient’s mobility and their daily lives. Detecting OA at an early stage allows for early intervention and may slow down disease progression. Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful technique to visualize soft tissues within the knee joint. Cartilage delineation in magnetic resonance (MR) images helps in understanding the disease progressions. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promising results in computer vision tasks, and various encoder–decoder-based segmentation neural networks are introduced in the last few years. However, the performances of such networks are unknown in the context of cartilage delineation. Methods: This study trained and compared 10 encoder–decoder-based CNNs in performing cartilage delineation from knee MR images. The knee MR images are obtained from Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The benchmarking process is to compare various CNNs based on the physical specifications and segmentation performances. Results: LadderNet has the least trainable parameters with model size of 5 MB. UNetVanilla crowned the best performances by having 0.8369, 0.9108, and 0.9097 on JSC, DSC, and MCC. Conclusion: UNetVanilla can be served as a benchmark for cartilage delineation in knee MR images while LadderNet served as alternative if there are hardware limitations during production.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 2188-2201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taejoon Eo ◽  
Yohan Jun ◽  
Taeseong Kim ◽  
Jinseong Jang ◽  
Ho‐Joon Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document