scholarly journals T1-weighted signal contrast optimization by rf pulse sequences

1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyh-Wen Chai ◽  
Hong N. Yeung ◽  
Norbert J. Pelc ◽  
Thilaka S. Sumanaweera
2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 1416-1420
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Bogachev ◽  
A. V. Nikitina ◽  
V. V. Frolov ◽  
Ya. Yu. Marchenko ◽  
B. P. Nikolaev

Neurosurgery ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Zabramski ◽  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Benjamin Kaufman

Abstract The recently developed technique of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging utilizes radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the presence of a strong magnetic field to provide cross sectional displays of body anatomy similar to computed tomography, When utilizing MR, the operator alters tissue contrast electronically by changing RF pulse sequences. The three most frequently used RF pulse sequences are partial-saturation (PS), inversion-recovery (IR), and spin-echo (SE). We evaluated the sensitivity of these RF sequences to detect ischemic changes in our primate model. Serial MR scans were carried out using all three pulse formats 5 to 60 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in four animals. SE- and IR-sequenced proton MR images readily identified areas of evolving infarct 5 to 6 hours after MCAO, whereas PS scans that were performed during this acute period appeared normal. From 24 to 60 hours after MCAO, PS-sequenced scans showed focal areas of progressively decreasing signal intensity. However, SE and IR scans performed at the same intervals always demonstrated more extensive tissue changes. The basis of MR imaging, the effects of altering RF pulse sequences, and the resulting interpretation of changes observed in MR sections are presented. (Neurosurgery 16: 502-510, 1985)


Author(s):  
James Pawley ◽  
David Joy

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) builds up an image by sampling contiguous sub-volumes near the surface of the specimen. A fine electron beam selectively excites each sub-volume and then the intensity of some resulting signal is measured and then plotted as a corresponding intensity in an image. The spatial resolution of such an image is limited by at least three factors. Two of these determine the size of the interaction volume: the size of the electron probe and the extent to which detectable signal is excited from locations remote from the beam impact area. A third limitation emerges from the fact that the probing beam is composed of a number of discrete particles and therefore that the accuracy with which any detectable signal can be measured is limited by Poisson statistics applied to this number (or to the number of events actually detected if this is smaller). As in all imaging techniques, the limiting signal contrast required to recognize a morphological structure is constrained by this statistical consideration. The only way to overcome this limit is to increase either the contrast of the measured signal or the number of beam/specimen interactions detected. Unfortunately, these interactions deposit ionizing radiation that may damage the very structure under investigation. As a result, any practical consideration of the high resolution performance of the SEM must consider not only the size of the interaction volume but also the contrast available from the signal producing the image and the radiation sensitivity of the specimen.


Author(s):  
T.W. Jeng ◽  
W. Chiu

With the advances in preparing biological materials in a thin and highly ordered form, and in maintaining them hydrated under vacuum, electron crystallography has become an important tool for biological structure investigation at high resolution (1,2). However, the electron radiation damage would limit the capability of recording reflections with low intensities in an electron diffraction pattern. It has been demonstrated that the use of a low temperature stage can reduce the radiation damage effect and that one can expose the specimen with a higher dose in order to increase the signal contrast (3). A further improvement can be made by selecting a proper photographic emulsion. The primary factors in evaluating the suitability of photographic emulsion for recording low dose diffraction patterns are speed, fog level, electron response at low electron exposure, linearity, and usable range of exposure. We have compared these factors with three photographic emulsions including Kodak electron microscopic plate (EMP), Industrex AA x-ray film (AA x-ray) and Kodak nuclear track film (NTB3).


2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sakamoto ◽  
T Sasano ◽  
S Higano ◽  
S Takahashi ◽  
T Nagasaka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir N. Maksymovych ◽  
Oleg I. Harasymchuk ◽  
Marya N. Mandrona
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document