Impact of radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients: A multicenter study

Author(s):  
Jordan Mamane ◽  
Stéphane Sanchez ◽  
Alexandre G. Lellouch ◽  
Victor Gaillard ◽  
Baptiste Poussot ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S167
Author(s):  
J. Mamane ◽  
S. Sanchez ◽  
A.G. Lellouch ◽  
M. El-Akrhi ◽  
T. Cousin ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairam R. Eswara ◽  
Robert Chan ◽  
Joel M. Vetter ◽  
H. Henry Lai ◽  
Timothy B. Boone ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Llorens ◽  
Tobias Pottek

Study Design This is a retrospective, non-randomised study. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter ZSI 375 inserted in male patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods Between May 2009 and January 2017, 45 men with SUI underwent ZSI 375 device insertion. Operations were performed in two French centres by one surgeon. Complications and pad used to manage continence were recorded. Results From May 2009 to January 2012, 45 patients with a mean age of 70.42 years underwent placement of the ZSI 375 device in France. The most common cause for incontinence was radical prostatectomy (RP, 33/45 ­patients, 73.33%). The minimal period of incontinence was 6 months. Twenty-seven out of 45 patients (60.00%) had a severe incontinence (at least four pads per day), 13 patients (28.89%) had moderate incontinence (three pads per day) and five patients (11.11%) had two pads per day. With a long follow-up, the ZSI 375 device was considered to be successful in 73.33% patients after 5 years (60 months) and 72% of patients after 7 years (84 months). The infection rate was 2.2 % affecting one in 45 patients. Six out of 45 patients presented a urethral erosion (13.33%). Mechanical failure with a revision occurred in three patients (6.67%). Conclusions The ZSI 375 device is a safe and effective device to treat severe SUI in men.


2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S164-S166
Author(s):  
I. Bentellis ◽  
M. El-Akri ◽  
J. Cornu ◽  
T. Brierre ◽  
T. Cousin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa R. Kaufman ◽  
Gerard Henry ◽  
Niels V. Johnsen ◽  
Mario A. Cleves ◽  
Joshua A. Broghammer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 236-236
Author(s):  
Sameer G. Jhavar ◽  
Erin Bird ◽  
Gregory P. Swanson

236 Background: To assess outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men who received prior pelvic radiation therapy. Methods: Between 1997 and 2012, 107 patients were identified from the Scott and White Hospital database who underwent artificial urinary sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostate cancer treatment. Of these 17 were excluded for lack of follow-up data. Of the remaining 90 patients, 59 patients underwent prior surgery alone (group 1), 25 underwent prior surgery followed by pelvic radiation therapy (group 2); and 6 patients underwent prior radiation therapy alone. Results: Average ages at sphincter implantation were 69 yrs. (range 54 - 82), 73 yrs. (range 63 - 81), and 70 yrs. (range 60 - 80) respectively for groups 1, 2 and 3. Social continence rates were 80% (47/59) for group 1, 72% (18/25) for Group 2 and 50% (3/6) for group 3 at an average follow-up of 6 yrs. (range 0 - 17), 4 yrs. (range 1 - 12) and 3 yrs. (range 0 - 6) respectively. Average time between surgery and sphincter implantation was 5 yrs. (range 1-27) in group 1. Average time between radiation and sphincter implantation was 7 yrs. (range 1 - 18) and 6 yrs. (range 1 - 17) in Groups 2 and 3. Re-operation rates were 42% (25/59); 48% (12/25); and 50% (3/6) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In men who were incontinent at last follow-up, the average time between pelvic radiation and sphincter placement was relatively shorter as compared to those who were continent [5 yrs. (range 1 -11) vs. 7 yrs. (range 1 - 18) in Group 2; and 4 yrs. (range 1 -5) vs.10 yrs. (range 4 - 17) in group 3]. The rates of erosions were 10/59 (17%); 4/25 (16%); and 0/6 (0%) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The rates of infection were 5/59 (8%), 0/25 (0%), and 2/6 (33%) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Our experience with artificial urinary sphincter in men who underwent prior pelvic radiation therapy is comparable to that reported in the literature. Our results identify factors associated with worse continence after artificial urinary sphincter in men who underwent prior pelvic radiation therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document