Effect of phase morphology and interfacial strength on barrier properties of high density polyethylene/polyamide 6 membranes

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1996-2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Lei ◽  
Qin Du ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
Shaoyun Guo
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Interfacial Strength ◽  
Barrier Properties ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
Phase Morphology ◽  
High Density

Barrier properties of polyamide-6/high density polyethylene blends

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. González-Nuñez ◽  
H. Padilla ◽  
D. De Kee ◽  
B. D. Favis
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Barrier Properties ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
High Density ◽  
Polyethylene Blends

Effect of various material parameters on barrier properties of high-density polyethylene/polyamide 6/clay nanocomposites

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-753
Author(s):  
Mehdi Moghri ◽  
Elena-Niculina Dragoi
Keyword(s):  
Differential Evolution ◽  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Barrier Properties ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
High Density ◽  
Clay Nanocomposites ◽  
Melt Mixing ◽  
Network Modelling ◽  
Local Search Procedure

In this work, the effect of four factors including the nanoclay (NC) content, polyamide 6 (PA-6) content, compatibilizer type, and amount, as material variables on barrier properties of different high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/PA-6/clay nanocomposites, was described. Response surface method was used as a tool for experimental design. Different PA-6/clay nanocomposites were prepared by melt mixing of PA-6 at different clay loadings using a corotating twin-screw extruder. Subsequently, different PA-6/NC compounds containing different amounts of clay were melt mixed with HDPE to produce blow-molded containers under fixed processing conditions. In order to model the permeability, a neural network modelling approach in combination with a modified version of differential evolution was employed. The differential evolution modifications included, among others, a local search procedure based on backpropagation. The best models determined had a mean squared error in the testing phase of less than 0.1 and an average relative error lower than 12.2%, the difference between experimental results and predictions being within an acceptable range. This indicates that the methodology used was able to efficiently model the considered process.

scholarly journals Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-351
Author(s):  
L.-A. Fillot ◽  
S. Ghiringhelli ◽  
C. Prebet ◽  
S. Rossi
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Barrier Properties ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
High Density

Ultrasonic characterization of phase morphology of high density polyethylene/polyamide 6 blend melts

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan Wang ◽  
Congmei Lin ◽  
Huimin Sun ◽  
Fan Chen ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
Phase Morphology ◽  
High Density ◽  
Ultrasonic Characterization

Selective localization of organic montmorillonite nanoparticles in multilayered high-density polyethylene/polyamide 6 composites

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1526-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaoyi Xie ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Shuhao Qin ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
Zhao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
High Density ◽  
Organic Montmorillonite ◽  
Selective Localization

Effect of compatibilizer and clay on morphology and fracture resistance of immiscible high density polyethylene/polyamide 6 blend

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 422-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Chen ◽  
Jing-wei Chen ◽  
Hai-ming Chen ◽  
Jing-hui Yang ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Density Polyethylene ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Polyamide 6 ◽  
High Density
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document