The role of communication and support in return to work following cancer-related absence

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1078-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yarker ◽  
F. Munir ◽  
M. Bains ◽  
K. Kalawsky ◽  
C. Haslam
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin D. Ashley ◽  
Loretta T. Lee ◽  
Karen Heaton

Despite improvements in the treatment of stroke, many individuals still face cognitive, emotional, and physical impairments. Stroke is a leading cause of serious long-term disability and subsequent failure to return to work (RTW). The purpose of this literature review was to synthesize and discuss the literature relevant to factors affecting RTW for stroke survivors, summarize the identified gaps, and discuss steps occupational health nurses can take to facilitate RTW among stroke survivors. A literature search was conducted using the keywords: “stroke,” “cerebrovascular disease,” “return to work,” and “employment.” After excluding articles based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, 19 quantitative research articles were reviewed. Consistent themes found in the literature affecting RTW following stroke included physical, social, and cognitive factors. One of the most consistent predictors of RTW found was stroke severity. Individuals who experienced a mild to moderate stroke, those of Caucasian ethnicity, and higher socioeconomic levels were more likely to RTW. Findings suggest the importance of future studies to examine factors among African American stroke survivors that predict RTW and the role of occupational health nurses.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Femke de Jong ◽  
Monique H Frings-Dresen ◽  
Nynke van Dijk ◽  
Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin ◽  
Kristel M van Asselt ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 1630-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J MacKenzie ◽  
J A Morris ◽  
G J Jurkovich ◽  
Y Yasui ◽  
B M Cushing ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Debra A. Dunstan ◽  
Katrien Mortelmans ◽  
Åsa Tjulin ◽  
Ellen MacEachen

There is a large body of research examining work disability management and the return to work (RTW) of sick or injured workers. However, although this research makes clear the roles of the returning worker and supervisor, that of the co-workers is less well understood. To increase understanding of this topic, we have identified, reviewed, and discussed three studies that emerged from our connection with a Canadian research-training program. The first study, conducted in Sweden by Tjulin, MacEachen, and Ekberg (2009), showed that co-workers can play a positive role in RTW, but this is often invisible to supervisors. The second study, undertaken by Dunstan and MacEachen (2013) in Canada, found that RTW could both positively and negatively impact co-workers. For instance, co-workers may benefit from learning new skills, but may also be burdened by the need to assume extra work to accommodate a returning worker. The third study, performed in Belgium by Mortelmans and Verjans (2012) and Mortelmans, Verjans, and Mairiaux (2012) reported the need to include the expectations and objections of co-workers in RTW plans and implemented a three-step RTW tool that involves co-workers. Taken together, these studies highlight the social context of work, the positive role played by co-workers in the RTW process, the impacts of workplace social relations on RTW outcomes, and the benefits to all of involving co-workers in RTW plans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document