Crop border and mineral oil sprays used in combination as physical control methods of the aphid-transmitted potato virus Y in potato

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Boiteau ◽  
Mathuresh Singh ◽  
Jacques Lavoie
2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1243-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manphool Fageria ◽  
Sébastien Boquel ◽  
Gaetan Leclair ◽  
Yvan Pelletier

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Kirchner ◽  
L. H. Hiltunen ◽  
J. Santala ◽  
T. F. Döring ◽  
J. Ketola ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Donald MacKenzie ◽  
Xianzhou Nie ◽  
Mathuresh Singh

In-field management of potato virus Y (PVY) faces challenges by changing availability and environmental acceptability of chemical agents to control aphid vectors of the virus, and by proliferation of PVY strains with different symptomology and rates of spread. Over 2018-2020, foliar spray treatments were compared in field experiments in New Brunswick, Canada, to measure effectiveness at reducing spread of PVYO, PVYN:O and PVYNTN strains. Mineral oil, insecticide, combined oil and insecticide spray and a biopesticide (i.e., LifeGard® WG) were compared. Insecticide-only and mineral oil-only were not effective, though several combined oil and insecticide, and biopesticide treatments significantly reduced PVY spread. The biopesticide was proportionately more effective with recombinant PVYN:O and PVYNTN strains, possibly from exciting the plant’s hypersensitive resistance response only caused naturally in cv. Goldrush by PVYO. Pesticide residue analysis showed that mineral oil enhanced the retention of pyrethroid insecticide in the potato foliage longer than with insecticide applied alone, which may explain the beneficial synergistic effect of combined sprays for reducing PVY spread. Tuber yields were generally unchanged in chemical insecticide treatments but were slightly lower in biopesticide treatment. The cost per PVY protection was competitive across all effective treatments, including biopesticide, however, there was some revenue loss from lower yield with the biopesticide. This biopesticide is organic-certified, however, thus a small premium on price for organic production could offset this yield deficit.


2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi Al-Daoud ◽  
Manphool S. Fageria ◽  
Jianhua Zhang ◽  
Sébastien Boquel ◽  
Yvan Pelletier

Plant Disease ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler D. B. MacKenzie ◽  
Manphool S. Fageria ◽  
Xianzhou Nie ◽  
Mathuresh Singh

The current-season spread of Potato virus Y (PVY) was monitored in 19 fields under various management practices in New Brunswick, Canada, through the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons. The focus of this study was to evaluate the role of seedborne PVY inoculum, aphid vector abundance, and the numbers, timing, and types of insecticide and mineral oil sprays, and to confirm the reliability and forecasting capacity of midseason PVY testing. In each field, 100 to 110 virus-free plants were identified shortly after emergence and were assessed four times from early July to early September (after top-kill) with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to track PVY spread. In addition, tubers harvested during development in August and after top-kill were grown-out in the greenhouse for ELISA testing. PVY spread to selected virus-free plants varied widely, ranging from 0 to 76.2% across all studied fields. Of the 19 fields over two seasons, 10 fields were planted with no detectable seedborne PVY, and they showed 0 to 8.7% (mean 2.9%) PVY spread by harvest. The remaining nine study fields with 0.9 to 5.8% seedborne PVY showed 1 to 76.2% (mean 15.2%) PVY spread by harvest. PVY spread was detected in most fields during midseason testing with ELISA and RT-PCR; all tests correlated well with final PVY rates after top-kill, though RT-PCR detection in developing tubers was most sensitive and correlated. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify major factors in PVY spread, including seedborne PVY, early-season aphid abundance, and the numbers of insecticide and mineral oil sprays. The best-fitting model, constructed using these factors as well as a measurement of July PVY incidence (ELISAJuly), strongly explained PVY spread by harvest, with the most significant management factor being the number of mineral oil sprays supplemented with insecticide used during the growing season. A similar model fitted without the ELISAJuly did not adequately predict ultimate PVY spread. The analysis suggests that mineral oil alone was effective at lowering PVY spread, and more effective when combined with insecticide, particularly when used early in the season. No evidence was found for differences in PVY spread across the eight cultivars used or across the range of mineral oil application rates, whereas some evidence was found for differences in the effectiveness of different insecticide types.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document