Comparison of IDW and Physically Based IDEW Method in Hydrological Modelling for a Large Mountainous Watershed, Northwest China

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 912-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zhang ◽  
C. He ◽  
J. Li ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
Z. Wang
2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 279-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Boegh ◽  
M Thorsen ◽  
M.B Butts ◽  
S Hansen ◽  
J.S Christiansen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 4063-4102
Author(s):  
K. Förster ◽  
G. Meon ◽  
U. Strasser

Abstract. Detailed physically based snowmelt models require a complete set of meteorological forcing data at the model's scale. Besides precipitation and temperature, time series of humidity, wind speed, and radiation have to be provided. The availability of these time series is in many cases restricted to a few meteorological stations and consequently, snowmelt modelling is often highly uncertain. To overcome this dilemma, the suitability of downscaled atmospheric analysis data for physically based snowmelt simulations in hydrological modelling is studied. We used the Weather Research and Forecast model (WRF) to derive spatial and temporal fields of meteorological surface variables as boundary conditions for four different snowmelt models. The simulations were carried out at the point scale and at the catchment scale for the Sieber catchment (44.4 km2), Harz Mountains, Germany. For the latter, all snowmelt models were integrated into the hydrological modelling system PANTA RHEI. All models performed well at both scales. In conclusion, the presented approach is suitable to derive reliable estimates of snowpack and snowmelt processes as part of water balance and flood simulations for catchments exposed to snow.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 04016007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanhui Zhang ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
Chansheng He ◽  
Baoqing Zhang ◽  
Xifeng Zhang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 945-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ewen ◽  
Enda O'Connell ◽  
James Bathurst ◽  
Steve J. Birkinshaw ◽  
Chris Kilsby ◽  
...  

The Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE) modelling system and physically-based distributed modelling (PBDM) were discussed in Refsgaard et al.'s Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling (Hydrology Research41, pp. 355–377). The opportunity is taken here to correct some oversights and potentially misleading perspectives in that paper and mount a more robust defence of PBDM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document